IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v38y2008i1p26-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chrysler and J. D. Power: Pioneering Scientific Price Customization in the Automobile Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge Silva-Risso

    (Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside, California 92521)

  • William V. Shearin

    (Chrysler LLC)

  • Irina Ionova

    (J. D. Power and Associates)

  • Alexei Khavaev

    (J. D. Power and Associates)

  • Deirdre Borrego

    (J. D. Power and Associates)

Abstract

Pricing is a critical component in the marketing-mix plans of automobile manufacturers. Because they tend to keep their manufacturer's suggested retail prices (MSRPs) and wholesale prices fixed throughout the model year, they customize pricing to reflect supply and demand by using incentives; in the US market, they represent approximately $45 billion per year. In addition, variations in capacity utilization have immediate and substantial effects on profitability. This, together with legacy costs and inflexible labor contracts, makes the effectiveness and efficiency of price-customization decisions particularly vital for the industry. Chrysler, a pioneer in using science in its pricing decisions, engaged J. D. Power and Associates (JDPA) to implement an incentive planning model. The approach used is based on a random-effects multinomial nested logit model of product (vehicle model), acquisition (cash, finance, lease), and program-type (e.g., consumer cash rebates, reduced interest-rate financing, cash/reduced interest-rate combinations, lease-support) selection. The model uses sales transaction data that are collected daily from approximately 10,000 dealerships. It uses a hierarchical Bayes modeling structure to capture response heterogeneity at the local market level. This specification allows users to apply the model to pricing decisions at the local, regional, and national market levels. Based on implementing this model, Chrysler learned that, for any given price level, the pricing structure (e.g., a combination of retail price, interest rates, or rebates) is important. The set of the most efficient pricing structures for each price level constitutes an efficient frontier ; efficient pricing structures vary across products, price levels, and markets. The system provides three alternative approaches to identify efficient (and effective) pricing programs: (a) what-if-scenario simulations, (b) a batch scenario generator that allows users to identify and examine the profit-share/volume efficient frontier, and (c) an optimizer that, given an objective and a set of constraints, allows users to search for incentive programs rapidly. The Chrysler Corporate Economics Office estimates that Chrysler's annual savings from implementing the model are approximately $500 million.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge Silva-Risso & William V. Shearin & Irina Ionova & Alexei Khavaev & Deirdre Borrego, 2008. "Chrysler and J. D. Power: Pioneering Scientific Price Customization in the Automobile Industry," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 26-39, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:26-39
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1070.0332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1070.0332
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1070.0332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magid M. Abraham & Leonard M. Lodish, 1993. "An Implemented System for Improving Promotion Productivity Using Store Scanner Data," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 248-269.
    2. Peter E. Rossi & Robert E. McCulloch & Greg M. Allenby, 1996. "The Value of Purchase History Data in Target Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 321-340.
    3. Norris Bruce & Preyas Desai & Richard Staelin, 2006. "Enabling the Willing: Consumer Rebates for Durable Goods," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 350-366, 07-08.
    4. Leeflang, P.S.H. & Wittink, Dick R., 2000. "Building models for marketing decisions: past, present and future," Research Report 00F20, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    5. Jorge Silva-Risso & Irina Ionova, 2008. "—A Nested Logit Model of Product and Transaction-Type Choice for Planning Automakers' Pricing and Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 545-566, 07-08.
    6. Steven Berry & James Levinsohn & Ariel Pakes, 2004. "Differentiated Products Demand Systems from a Combination of Micro and Macro Data: The New Car Market," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(1), pages 68-105, February.
    7. K. Sudhir, 2001. "Competitive Pricing Behavior in the Auto Market: A Structural Analysis," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 42-60, January.
    8. Varian, Hal R, 1980. "A Model of Sales," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(4), pages 651-659, September.
    9. Kenneth E. Train & Clifford Winston, 2007. "Vehicle Choice Behavior And The Declining Market Share Of U.S. Automakers," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1469-1496, November.
    10. Kwangpil Chang & S. Siddarth & Charles B. Weinberg, 1999. "The Impact of Heterogeneity in Purchase Timing and Price Responsiveness on Estimates of Sticker Shock Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 178-192.
    11. Randolph E. Bucklin & Sunil Gupta, 1999. "Commercial Use of UPC Scanner Data: Industry and Academic Perspectives," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 247-273.
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:00f20 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Jorge M. Silva-Risso & Randolph E. Bucklin & Donald G. Morrison, 1999. "A Decision Support System for Planning Manufacturers' Sales Promotion Calendars," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 274-300.
    14. Berry, Steven & Levinsohn, James & Pakes, Ariel, 1995. "Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 841-890, July.
    15. Richard A. Colombo & Donald G. Morrison, 1989. "Note—A Brand Switching Model with Implications for Marketing Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 89-99.
    16. Thompson, Patrick A & Noordewier, Thomas, 1992. "Estimating the Effects of Consumer Incentive Programs on Domestic Automobile Sales," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 10(4), pages 409-417, October.
    17. Peter E. Rossi & Greg M. Allenby, 2003. "Bayesian Statistics and Marketing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 304-328, July.
    18. K. Sudhir, 2001. "Competitive Pricing Behavior in the US Auto Market: A Structural Analysis," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm228, Yale School of Management.
    19. Magid M. Abraham & Leonard M. Lodish, 1987. "Promoter: An Automated Promotion Evaluation System," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 101-123.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oded Netzer & Ronen Feldman & Jacob Goldenberg & Moshe Fresko, 2012. "Mine Your Own Business: Market-Structure Surveillance Through Text Mining," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 521-543, May.
    2. Hongmin Li & Scott Webster & Nicholas Mason & Karl Kempf, 2019. "Product-Line Pricing Under Discrete Mixed Multinomial Logit Demand," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 14-28, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Silva-Risso & Irina Ionova, 2008. "—A Nested Logit Model of Product and Transaction-Type Choice for Planning Automakers' Pricing and Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 545-566, 07-08.
    2. Paulo Albuquerque & Bart J. Bronnenberg, 2012. "Measuring the Impact of Negative Demand Shocks on Car Dealer Networks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 4-23, January.
    3. Haaf, C. Grace & Morrow, W. Ross & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Feit, Elea McDonnell & Michalek, Jeremy J., 2016. "Forecasting light-duty vehicle demand using alternative-specific constants for endogeneity correction versus calibration," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 182-210.
    4. Jayarajan, Dinakar & Siddarth, S. & Silva-Risso, Jorge, 2018. "Cannibalization vs. competition: An empirical study of the impact of product durability on automobile demand," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 641-660.
    5. Shiau, Ching-Shin Norman & Michalek, Jeremy J. & Hendrickson, Chris T., 2009. "A structural analysis of vehicle design responses to Corporate Average Fuel Economy policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(9-10), pages 814-828, November.
    6. O. Cem Ozturk & Sriram Venkataraman & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2016. "Price Reactions to Rivals’ Local Channel Exits," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 588-604, July.
    7. Jose A. Guajardo & Morris A. Cohen & Serguei Netessine, 2016. "Service Competition and Product Quality in the U.S. Automobile Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 1860-1877, July.
    8. Satoshi Myojo & Yuichiro Kanazawa, 2010. "On Asymptotic Properties of the Parameters of Differentiated Product Demand and Supply Systems When Demographically-Categorized Purchasing Pattern Data are Available," Discussion Papers 1009, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    9. Guofang Huang, 2020. "When to haggle, when to hold firm? Lessons from the used‐car retail market," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 579-604, July.
    10. Linli Xu & Kenneth C. Wilbur & S. Siddarth & Jorge M. Silva-Risso, 2014. "Price Advertising by Manufacturers and Dealers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2816-2834, November.
    11. Sanjog Misra, 2005. "Generalized Reverse Discrete Choice Models," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 175-200, June.
    12. Suresh Divakar & Brian T. Ratchford & Venkatesh Shankar, 2005. "Practice Prize Article—: A Multichannel, Multiregion Sales Forecasting Model and Decision Support System for Consumer Packaged Goods," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 334-350, July.
    13. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Uncles, Mark D. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1307-1325, December.
    14. Michel Wedel & Jie Zhang & Fred Feinberg, 2015. "Implementing Retail Category Management: a Model-Based Approach to Setting Optimal Markups," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 2(2), pages 165-176, June.
    15. Jorge M. Silva-Risso & Randolph E. Bucklin & Donald G. Morrison, 1999. "A Decision Support System for Planning Manufacturers' Sales Promotion Calendars," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(3), pages 274-300.
    16. Andres Terech & Randolph Bucklin & Donald Morrison, 2009. "Consideration, choice, and classifying loyalty," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 209-225, September.
    17. Sudhir Voleti & Praveen K. Kopalle & Pulak Ghosh, 2015. "An Interproduct Competition Model Incorporating Branding Hierarchy and Product Similarities Using Store-Level Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(11), pages 2720-2738, November.
    18. Sungho Park & Sachin Gupta, 2012. "Handling Endogenous Regressors by Joint Estimation Using Copulas," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 567-586, July.
    19. Lurkin, Virginie & Garrow, Laurie A. & Higgins, Matthew J. & Newman, Jeffrey P. & Schyns, Michael, 2017. "Accounting for price endogeneity in airline itinerary choice models: An application to Continental U.S. markets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 228-246.
    20. Dongling Huang & Christian Rojas & Frank Bass, 2008. "What Happens When Demand Is Estimated With A Misspecified Model?," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 809-839, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:26-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.