IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1907-d1040840.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Green and Low-Carbon Rural Development in China: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace (1979–2021)

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Liu

    (School of Geographic Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China
    Key Laboratory of Digital Urban and Rural Spatial Planning of Hunan Province, Yiyang 413000, China)

  • Chan Lu

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    School of Urban and Environment, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China)

  • Chun Yi

    (College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Hunan City University, Yiyang 413000, China
    Key Laboratory of Digital Urban and Rural Spatial Planning of Hunan Province, Yiyang 413000, China)

Abstract

Green and low-carbon rural development (GLRD) is becoming an important way to explore sustainable development in rural areas of China. It is significant for the sustainable development of the rural economy and of society to build a rural carbon sink system, advocate low-carbon emissions in rural areas, and promote the development of rural green industries and rural transformation. In this study, the existing knowledge system of GLRD was analyzed using CiteSpace. Keywords related to GLRD and their occurrence frequency were identified using keyword co-occurrence analysis. The knowledge evolution stages of GLRD were explored using citation burst analysis. Thus, the evolution of the research related to GLRD was revealed. The summary of Chinese GLRD-related research literature shows that: (1) according to the CiteSpace analysis, the GLRD research can be divided into three stages: starting, rising, and expanding and deepening; (2) GLRD research has focused on low-carbon development, green development, and then green and low-carbon integrated development, thus forming three major research content systems; (3) GLRD’s research content gradually became rich, as over time, the research focus became increasingly prominent and research integration was gradually strengthened; (4) the GLRD literature still has some limitations, e.g., nonunified measurement standards, insufficient research depth and practical significance, and relatively weak innovative policy research; (5) future research should strengthen the scientific evaluation and prediction of rural green and low-carbon functions. The industrial development pathways and regional characteristic modes of GLRD should be further studied. Innovative GLRD policies should be proposed to provide a theoretical basis and decision-making reference for GLRD and construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Liu & Chan Lu & Chun Yi, 2023. "Research on Green and Low-Carbon Rural Development in China: A Scientometric Analysis Using CiteSpace (1979–2021)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1907-:d:1040840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1907/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1907/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongze Li & FengYun Li & Xinhua Yu, 2018. "China’s Contributions to Global Green Energy and Low-Carbon Development: Empirical Evidence under the Belt and Road Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Pal, Suresh & Birthal, Pratap S. & Mruthyunjaya, 1992. "Changes In Agriculture Of The Green Revolution States: Implications For Agricultural Development," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 5(1).
    3. Ma, Sining & Guo, Siyue & Zheng, Dingqian & Chang, Shiyan & Zhang, Xiliang, 2021. "Roadmap towards clean and low carbon heating to 2035: A provincial analysis in northern China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    4. Fleischer, Aliza & Lichtman, Ivgenia & Mendelsohn, Robert, 2008. "Climate change, irrigation, and Israeli agriculture: Will warming be harmful?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 508-515, April.
    5. Yingling Shi & Xinping Liu, 2019. "Research on the Literature of Green Building Based on the Web of Science: A Scientometric Analysis in CiteSpace (2002–2018)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-22, July.
    6. Ann-Kristin Mühlbach & Olaf Mumm & Ryan Zeringue & Oskars Redbergs & Elisabeth Endres & Vanessa Miriam Carlow, 2021. "TOPOI RESOURCES: Quantification and Assessment of Global Warming Potential and Land-Uptake of Residential Buildings in Settlement Types along the Urban–Rural Gradient—Opportunities for Sustainable Dev," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-33, April.
    7. Guochao Zhao & Xiaofen Yu & Chenchen He & Fan Tu, 2019. "Low‐carbon evaluation of rural neighborhood: A case study of Yanhe Village, Hubei Province, China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 247-265, March.
    8. Tatsuki Ueda & Yoji Kunimitsu, 2017. "Economic and environmental impacts of agricultural and rural development projects in Japan: evidence from an interregional input–output analysis," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 399-426, October.
    9. Jing Hou & Bo Hou, 2019. "Farmers’ Adoption of Low-Carbon Agriculture in China: An Extended Theory of the Planned Behavior Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, March.
    10. Hongpeng Guo & Shuang Xu & Chulin Pan, 2020. "Measurement of the Spatial Complexity and Its Influencing Factors of Agricultural Green Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Xueyao Zhang & Hong Chen, 2021. "Green Agricultural Development Based on Information Communication Technology and the Panel Space Measurement Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, January.
    12. Feltynowski Marcin, 2020. "Local initiatives for green space using Poland's Village Fund: evidence from Lodzkie voivodeship," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 50(50), pages 31-41, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna A. Kamińska & Guido Sciavicco & Jan K. Kazak, 2023. "Sustainable Cities and Regions—Statistical Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-3, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng Zhou & Chunhui Wen, 2023. "Research on the Level of Agricultural Green Development, Regional Disparities, and Dynamic Distribution Evolution in China from the Perspective of Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-47, July.
    2. Hua Guo & Fan Gu & Yanling Peng & Xin Deng & Lili Guo, 2022. "Does Digital Inclusive Finance Effectively Promote Agricultural Green Development?—A Case Study of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Pei Xu & Zehu Jin & Huan Tang, 2022. "Influence Paths and Spillover Effects of Agricultural Agglomeration on Agricultural Green Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Mustaffa, Nur Kamaliah & Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, 2022. "Challenges and way forward towards best practices of energy efficient building in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. Ding, Yimin & Wang, Weiguang & Song, Ruiming & Shao, Quanxi & Jiao, Xiyun & Xing, Wanqiu, 2017. "Modeling spatial and temporal variability of the impact of climate change on rice irrigation water requirements in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 89-101.
    6. Zixin Dou & Yanming Sun & Tao Wang & Huiyin Wan & Shiqi Fan, 2021. "Exploring Regional Advanced Manufacturing and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The discrimination of adopters and non-adopters of conservation agricultural initiatives in northwest Iran: Attitudinal, soil testing, and topographical modules," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    8. Jithitikulchai, Theepakorn, 2023. "The effect of climate change and agricultural diversification on the total value of agricultural output of farm households in Sub-Saharan Africa," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 18(2), October.
    9. Li, Muyuan & Yao, Jinfeng & Shen, Yanbo & Yuan, Bin & Simmonds, Ian & Liu, Yunyun, 2023. "Impact of synoptic circulation patterns on renewable energy-related variables over China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Huamei Shao & Gunwoo Kim & Qing Li & Galen Newman, 2021. "Web of Science-Based Green Infrastructure: A Bibliometric Analysis in CiteSpace," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Zixin Dou & BeiBei Wu & Yanming Sun & Tao Wang, 2021. "The Competitiveness of Manufacturing and Its Driving Factors: A Case Study of G20 Participating Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    12. Jing Hou & Linhai Wu & Bo Hou, 2020. "Risk Attitude, Contract Arrangements and Enforcement in Food Safety Governance: A China’s Agri-Food Supply Chain Scenario," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. David Koren & Katarina Rus, 2019. "The Potential of Open Space for Enhancing Urban Seismic Resilience: A literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Adina-Eliza Croitoru & Titus Cristian Man & Sorin Daniel Vâtcă & Bela Kobulniczky & Vlad Stoian, 2020. "Refining the Spatial Scale for Maize Crop Agro-Climatological Suitability Conditions in a Region with Complex Topography towards a Smart and Sustainable Agriculture. Case Study: Central Romania (Cluj ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Anderson, Blake & M'Gonigle, Michael, 2012. "Does ecological economics have a future?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 37-48.
    16. Ding, Tao & Sun, Yuge & Huang, Can & Mu, Chenlu & Fan, Yuqi & Lin, Jiang & Qin, Yining, 2022. "Pathways of clean energy heating electrification programs for reducing carbon emissions in Northwest China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Zhou, Li & Turvey, Calum G., 2014. "Climate change, adaptation and China's grain production," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 72-89.
    18. Hatem Abushammala & Salma Taqi Ghulam, 2022. "Impact of Residents’ Demographics on Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices towards Waste Management at the Household Level in the United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Abadi, Bijan & Yadollahi, Arash & Bybordi, Ahmad & Rahmati, Mehdi, 2020. "The contribution of diverse motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation agriculture features in decision-making," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Redouan Assadiki & Gérard Merlin & Hervé Boileau & Catherine Buhé & Fouzi Belmir, 2022. "Status and Prospects of Green Building in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) Region with a Focus on the Moroccan Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1907-:d:1040840. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.