IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p393-d1015787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Agricultural Exports: Evidence from China Based on the Technological Added Value

Author

Listed:
  • Lirong Xing

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Xiaomiao Yin

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Chuanxiang Cao

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Ehsan Elahi

    (School of Economics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Taoyuan Wei

    (CICERO Center for International Climate Research, 0349 Oslo, Norway)

Abstract

Agricultural exports are vulnerable to many distance factors such as geographical, cultural, economic and institutional distance. Panel data were collected from 63 countries (from 2002 to 2020), and fixed effects regression models were employed to estimate the impact of multidimensional distance on China’s agricultural exports. Results found that the institutional, geographical, and cultural distance negatively impacted China’s agricultural exports significantly. The economic distance significantly promoted exports due to the demand and complementarity of trade between countries. After the technological added value is considered, the cultural distance significantly promoted the export of high-tech agricultural products. It is confirmed that the institutional distance remained the greatest obstacle to agricultural exports, and economic distance promoted agricultural exports. It is imperative to focus on promoting mutual cultural understanding and communication of institutional policies to stimulate agricultural exports and improve the exports of agricultural products of high technological content.

Suggested Citation

  • Lirong Xing & Xiaomiao Yin & Chuanxiang Cao & Ehsan Elahi & Taoyuan Wei, 2022. "The Impact of Multidimensional Distance on Agricultural Exports: Evidence from China Based on the Technological Added Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:393-:d:1015787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Möhlmann & Sjef Ederveen & Henri L.F. de Groot & Gert-Jan M. Linders, 2009. "Intangible Barriers to International Trade: A Sectoral Approach," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 09-021/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    2. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zofío, José L., 2018. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-87.
    3. Fratianni, Michele & Kang, Heejoon, 2006. "Heterogeneous distance-elasticities in trade gravity models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 68-71, January.
    4. Yotov, Yoto V., 2012. "A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 794-798.
    5. Henri L. F. De Groot & Gert‐Jan Linders & Piet Rietveld & Uma Subramanian, 2004. "The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), pages 103-123, February.
    6. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Hongxia & Lirong, Xing & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2021. "Understanding cognitive and socio-psychological factors determining farmers’ intentions to use improved grassland: Implications of land use policy for sustainable pasture production," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    7. Bedassa Tadesse & Roger White, 2010. "Does Cultural Distance Hinder Trade in Goods? A Comparative Study of Nine OECD Member Nations," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 237-261, April.
    8. Dennis Novy, 2013. "Gravity Redux: Measuring International Trade Costs With Panel Data," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 101-121, January.
    9. Guo, Yibei & Dong, Baomin, 2021. "Railway and trade in modern China: Evidence from the 1930s," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    10. Chang, Yuan-Ching & Polachek, Solomon W. & Robst, John, 2004. "Conflict and trade: the relationship between geographic distance and international interactions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 491-509, September.
    11. Hillberry, Russell & Hummels, David, 2008. "Trade responses to geographic frictions: A decomposition using micro-data," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 527-550, April.
    12. Arribas, Iván & Bensassi, Sami & Tortosa-Ausina, Emili, 2020. "Trade integration in the European Union: Openness, interconnectedness, and distance," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    13. Harms, Philipp & Shuvalova, Daria, 2020. "Cultural distance and international trade in services: A disaggregate view," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    14. Scott L. Baier & Jeffrey H. Bergstrand & Ronald Mariutto, 2014. "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements Revisited: Distinguishing Sources of Interdependence," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 31-58, February.
    15. Tianbo Wu & Bin Zhang & Yukun Cao & Pingjun Sun, 2020. "Impact of Multi-Dimensional and Dynamic Distance on China’s Exports of Wooden Forest Products to Countries along the “Belt and Road”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    16. Halaszovich, Tilo F. & Kinra, Aseem, 2020. "The impact of distance, national transportation systems and logistics performance on FDI and international trade patterns: Results from Asian global value chains," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 35-47.
    17. Natale, Fabrizio & Borrello, Alessandra & Motova, Arina, 2015. "Analysis of the determinants of international seafood trade using a gravity model," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 98-106.
    18. Gokmen, Gunes, 2017. "Clash of civilizations and the impact of cultural differences on trade," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 449-458.
    19. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Weijun, Cui & Zhang, Huiming, 2020. "The public policy of agricultural land allotment to agrarians and its impact on crop productivity in Punjab province of Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Jason Query, 2020. "Differing trade elasticities for intra‐ and international distances: A gravity approach," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 913-929, August.
    21. Bedassa Tadesse & Roger White, 2010. "Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 147-152, January.
    22. Frederik Stender & Axel Berger & Clara Brandi & Jakob Schwab, 2021. "The Trade Effects of the Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States: Early Empirical Insights from Panel Data," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1495-1515, November.
    23. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab & Zhang, Zhixin, 2022. "Understanding farmers’ intention and willingness to install renewable energy technology: A solution to reduce the environmental emissions of agriculture," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    24. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    25. Lawrence, Edward R. & Raithatha, Mehul & Rodriguez, Ivan, 2021. "The effect of cultural and institutional factors on initiation, completion, and duration of cross-border acquisitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    26. Ioanna Konstantakopoulou, 2016. "New evidence on the Export-led-growth hypothesis in the Southern Euro-zone countries (1960-2014)," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 429-439.
    27. Gert-Jan M. Linders & Arjen Slangen & Henri L.F. de Groot & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk, 2005. "Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 05-074/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    28. Elahi, Ehsan & Khalid, Zainab, 2022. "Estimating smart energy inputs packages using hybrid optimisation technique to mitigate environmental emissions of commercial fish farms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiaomiao Yin & Lirong Xing & Chunxiao Cui, 2023. "The Impact of Multi-Dimensional Vectors on China’s Agricultural Products Export: Based on fsQCA," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Ailan & Lu, Cuicui & Wang, Zhixuan, 2021. "Does cultural distance hinder exports?: A comparative study of China and the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Yan Zhao & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Xuegang Sun & Fang Sun, 2023. "Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: Analysis of CEO Power and Corporate Risk," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Min Zhu & Haiyun Tang & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Kaili Wang & Nimra Nisar, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Influencing Factors of Ecological Protection Levels in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yellow River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Shengnan Huang & Ehsan Elahi, 2022. "Farmers’ Preferences for Recycling Pesticide Packaging Waste: An Implication of a Discrete Choice Experiment Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Feng Ji & Guangyuan Zhao & Lun Meng & Rana Tehseen & Fushuai Wang, 2022. "Cultivating Talents for Reporting Environmental News on China’s Carbon Neutrality Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Xiuli Cui & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid & Bo Xu, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Manufacturing Technological Progress and Pollution Emissions: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Lun Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Yuzhong Zhou & Liming Wang & Shihan Zhang, 2022. "A Review of Packaging Materials’ Consumption Regulation and Pollution Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.
    8. Xingshuai Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Zainab Khalid, 2022. "Do Green Finance Policies Foster Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance of Corporate?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Tianbo Wu & Bin Zhang & Yukun Cao & Pingjun Sun, 2020. "Impact of Multi-Dimensional and Dynamic Distance on China’s Exports of Wooden Forest Products to Countries along the “Belt and Road”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    10. Haidong Yuan & Chin-Hong Puah & Josephine Tan-Hwang Yau, 2022. "How Does Population Aging Impact Household Financial Asset Investment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Kaili Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Yuge Zhang & Di Wang & Zainab Khalid, 2022. "A Development of Green Finance and Regional Eco-Efficiency in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Zhixin Zhang & Yingjie Li & Ehsan Elahi & Yameng Wang, 2022. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Agricultural Modernization Levels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    13. Wei Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Shiying Sun & Xiaoqing Tong & Zhaosen Zhang & Mohammad Ilyas Abro, 2023. "Factors Influencing Water Use Efficiency in Agriculture: A Case Study of Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Gong, Maogang & Elahi, Ehsan, 2022. "A nexus between farmland rights, and access, demand, and amount of agricultural loan under the socialist system of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Liu, Ailan & Lu, Cuicui & Wang, Zhixuan, 2020. "The roles of cultural and institutional distance in international trade: Evidence from China's trade with the Belt and Road countries," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Das, Joy & Tanger, Shaun & Fannin, J. Matthew & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2020. "Institutional Determinant of Market Concentration and Trade in a General Equilibrium Setup," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304458, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Xiaolong Gao & Changfei Li & Ehsan Elahi & Mohammad Ilyas Abro & Zhaocai Cui, 2023. "Technological Innovation, Product Quality and Upgrading of Manufacturing Value Chain: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Xingshuai Wang & Ehsan Elahi & Lianggui Zhang, 2022. "Mandatory Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Ion MUȘCHEI, 2019. "The relationship between institutions and trade, empirical analysis from the Republic of Moldova case," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 5(2), pages 4-23, December.
    20. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Zofío, José L., 2018. "Does Institutional Quality Matter for Trade? Institutional Conditions in a Sectoral Trade Framework," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 72-87.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:393-:d:1015787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.