IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2423-d753900.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using a Product Life Cycle Cost Model to Solve Supplier Selection Problems in a Sustainable, Resilient Supply Chain

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Jwo Tao

    (Graduate Institute of Technological & Vocational Education, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan
    Department of Business, National Open University, Taipei 10607, Taiwan
    Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei 10607, Taiwan)

  • Yi-Shyuan Lin

    (Graduate Institute of Technological & Vocational Education, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 10608, Taiwan)

  • Hsuan-Shih Lee

    (Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan
    Department of Information Management, Ming Chuan University, Taipei 11103, Taiwan)

  • Guo-Ya Gan

    (College of Auditing and Evaluation, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China)

  • Chang-Shu Tu

    (Department of Information Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City 33302, Taiwan)

Abstract

Supplier selection constitutes a crucial component of manufacturing procurement. We developed a product life cycle cost (PLCC) model to support Taiwanese light-emitting diode (LED) manufacturers in capacity planning for sustainable and resilient supply chain (SC) management. For firms, supply chain PLCC (SCPLCC) is a key consideration, but relevant evidence is scarce. We applied two types of goal programming, namely multiobjective linear programming and revised multichoice goal programming (RMCGP), to develop a PLCC-based model that minimizes net costs, rejections, and late deliveries. Moreover, we constructed a decision-making tool for application to a case of SC sustainable procurement management in a high-tech Taiwanese LED company. Managers can resolve relevant problems by employing the two approaches of the SCPLCC model with various parameters. The implementation of RMCGP with weighted linear goal programming sensitivity analysis produced sufficient findings, according to a study of five models for practical implications. The primary findings of the current model assist business decision-makers in minimizing PLCC, reducing PLCC cost, minimizing net cost, number of rejections, number of late deliveries, achieving PLCC goals, and selecting the best supplier in the context of sustainable SC development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Jwo Tao & Yi-Shyuan Lin & Hsuan-Shih Lee & Guo-Ya Gan & Chang-Shu Tu, 2022. "Using a Product Life Cycle Cost Model to Solve Supplier Selection Problems in a Sustainable, Resilient Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2423-:d:753900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2423/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2423/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Shashi & Rajwinder Singh & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2018. "Evaluating Partnerships in Sustainability-Oriented Food Supply Chain: A Five-Stage Performance Measurement Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Chien-Wen Shen & Yen-Ting Peng & Chang-Shu Tu, 2019. "Considering Product Life Cycle Cost Purchasing Strategy for Solving Vendor Selection Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    5. Al-Husain, Raed & Khorramshahgol, Reza, 2020. "Incorporating analytical hierarchy process and goal programming to design responsive and efficient supply chains," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    6. Kumar, Manoj & Vrat, Prem & Shankar, Ravi, 2006. "A fuzzy programming approach for vendor selection problem in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 273-285, June.
    7. Chi-Tai Wang & Sih-Jie Su, 2015. "Strategic capacity planning for light emitting diode (LED) supply chains across Taiwan and China," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 66(12), pages 1989-2003, December.
    8. Cynthia Hardy & Vikram Bhakoo & Steve Maguire, 2020. "A New Methodology for Supply Chain Management: Discourse Analysis and its Potential for Theoretical Advancement," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 56(2), pages 19-35, April.
    9. Sara Alonso-Muñoz & Rocío González-Sánchez & Cristina Siligardi & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "New Circular Networks in Resilient Supply Chains: An External Capital Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
    10. Marta Negri & Enrico Cagno & Claudia Colicchia & Joseph Sarkis, 2021. "Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2858-2886, November.
    11. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    12. Patton, W. III, 1997. "Individual and joint decision-making in industrial vendor selection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 115-122, February.
    13. Wang, Ge & Huang, Samuel H. & Dismukes, John P., 2004. "Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Chang, Ching-Ter, 2007. "Multi-choice goal programming," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 389-396, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koc, Kerim & Ekmekcioğlu, Ömer & Işık, Zeynep, 2023. "Developing a probabilistic decision-making model for reinforced sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gezen, Mesliha & Karaaslan, Abdulkerim, 2022. "Energy planning based on Vision-2023 of Turkey with a goal programming under fuzzy multi-objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    2. Chien-Wen Shen & Yen-Ting Peng & Chang-Shu Tu, 2019. "Considering Product Life Cycle Cost Purchasing Strategy for Solving Vendor Selection Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-17, July.
    3. van der Rhee, Bo & Verma, Rohit & Plaschka, Gerhard, 2009. "Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: The role of flexibility, delivery, and value-added services/support," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 30-41, July.
    4. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Bettahar, Samir & Benbouziane, Mohamed, 2018. "Optimizing renewable energy portfolios under uncertainty: A multi-segment fuzzy goal programming approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 540-552.
    5. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    6. Figueroa–García, Juan Carlos & Hernández, Germán & Franco, Carlos, 2022. "A review on history, trends and perspectives of fuzzy linear programming," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    7. Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar & Cañal-Fernández, Verónica, 2016. "A model based on Copula Theory for sustainable and social responsible investments," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-76.
    8. Irfan Ali & Armin Fügenschuh & Srikant Gupta & Umar Muhammad Modibbo, 2020. "The LR-Type Fuzzy Multi-Objective Vendor Selection Problem in Supply Chain Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Araz, Ceyhun & Ozkarahan, Irem, 2007. "Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(2), pages 585-606, April.
    10. Gang Lin & Honglei Xu & Shaoli Wang & Conghua Lin & Chenyu Huang, 2022. "Performance Optimisation of Public Transport Networks Using AHP-Dependent Multi-Aspiration-Level Goal Programming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    12. Ana Carolina Silva & Catarina Moreira Marques & Jorge Pinho de Sousa, 2023. "A Simulation Approach for the Design of More Sustainable and Resilient Supply Chains in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    14. Ching-Ter Chang & Huang-Mu Chen & Zheng-Yun Zhuang, 2014. "Integrated multi-choice goal programming and multi-segment goal programming for supplier selection considering imperfect-quality and price-quantity discounts in a multiple sourcing environment," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 1101-1111, May.
    15. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 7-40, April.
    16. Ashish Dwivedi & Dindayal Agrawal & Ajay Jha & Massimo Gastaldi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Idiano D’Adamo, 2021. "Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility: Implications for Sustainable Development Goals," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 179-197, December.
    17. Zheng-Yun Zhuang & Chi-Kit Ho & Paul Juinn Bing Tan & Jia-Ming Ying & Jin-Hua Chen, 2020. "The Optimal Setting of A/B Exam Papers without Item Pools: A Hybrid Approach of IRT and BGP," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    18. Vasant, Pandian M. & Barsoum, Nader N. & Bhattacharya, Arijit, 2008. "Possibilistic optimization in planning decision of construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 664-675, February.
    19. Shalabh Singh & Sonia Singh, 2022. "Shipment in a multi-choice environment: a case study of shipping carriers in US," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1195-1219, December.
    20. Jin Shi & Youngwon Park & Ryosuke Sugie & Mitsuhiro Fukuzawa, 2022. "Long-Term Partnerships in Japanese Firms’ Logistics Outsourcing: From a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-13, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2423-:d:753900. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.