IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9059-d870261.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rural Effectiveness Evaluation: A New Way of Assessing Village Development Status

Author

Listed:
  • Yifang Wang

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Linlin Cheng

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yang Zheng

    (College of Geoscience and Surveying Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

China is currently at a crucial stage of rural revival and transformation growth. Accurate measurement of rural development status is able to provide decision-making services for rural revitalization plan implementation. To address this issue, combining with effectiveness concepts and on the basis of the widely recognized “production–living–ecology” perspective of rural development in the world, this study proposes an innovative technical evaluating system for rural effectiveness. We constructed a rural effectiveness evaluation index system and measurement model, as well as a four-quadrant approach to identify the effectiveness of villages, selecting Xintai county, a typical resource-depleted city, for empirical analysis to verify the evaluation technical system. The results show that (1) 220 villages had comprehensive effectiveness, accounting for 27.8% of the total; the amount of effectiveness for villages in terms of the production, living, and ecological dimensions were 204, 229 and 195, respectively, and they clearly displayed heterogeneity in terms of spatial distribution. (2) The following are village effectiveness dominant types: the function dominates the comprehensive effectiveness. For each dimension, there is a functionally dominant type. (3) Bivariate Moran’s I analysis revealed the relationships’ internal effectiveness. In the same dimension, there was a conflict between efficiency and function. In each dimension, trade-offs were found between the production function, ecological function, living efficiency, as well as production efficiency, ecological function, and efficiency. Synergies were found among the production function and ecological efficiency. Living efficiency had synergies with production efficiency and ecological efficiency. This research enriched the theoretical approach of assessing rural development status and can help guide the rational conversion of village elements to achieve village transformation and sustainability development, as well as providing technical assistance for the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifang Wang & Linlin Cheng & Yang Zheng, 2022. "Rural Effectiveness Evaluation: A New Way of Assessing Village Development Status," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9059-:d:870261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9059/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9059/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristensen, Søren Bech Pilgaard & Busck, Anne Gravsholt & van der Sluis, Theo & Gaube, Veronika, 2016. "Patterns and drivers of farm-level land use change in selected European rural landscapes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 786-799.
    2. Liu, Chao & Xu, Yueqing & Lu, Xinhai & Han, Jing, 2021. "Trade-offs and driving forces of land use functions in ecologically fragile areas of northern Hebei Province: Spatiotemporal analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Le Bivic, Camille & Melot, Romain, 2020. "Scheduling urbanization in rural municipalities: Local practices in land-use planning on the fringes of the Paris region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    5. Zhimin Dai & Lu Guo & Zhengyi Jiang, 2016. "Study on the industrial Eco-Efficiency in East China based on the Super Efficiency DEA Model: an example of the 2003–2013 panel data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(59), pages 5779-5785, December.
    6. Song, Wei & Li, Huanhuan, 2020. "Spatial pattern evolution of rural settlements from 1961 to 2030 in Tongzhou District, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Graymore, M.L.M. & Sipe, Neil G. & Rickson, Roy E., 2010. "Sustaining Human Carrying Capacity: A tool for regional sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 459-468, January.
    8. Balta, Sıla & Atik, Meryem, 2022. "Rural planning guidelines for urban-rural transition zones as a tool for the protection of rural landscape characters and retaining urban sprawl: Antalya case from Mediterranean," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    9. Daquan Huang & Yue Lang & Tao Liu, 2021. "The Evolving Structure of Rural Construction Land in Urbanizing China: Case Study of Tai’an Prefecture," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    10. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    11. Amartuvshin, Amarjargal & Chen, Jiquan & John, Ranjeet & Zhang, Yaoqi & Lkhagvaa, Dansranbavuu, 2021. "How does mining policy affect rural migration of Mongolia?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. João Pompeu & Luciana Soler & Jean Ometto, 2018. "Modelling Land Sharing and Land Sparing Relationship with Rural Population in the Cerrado," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Shkaruba, Anton & Kireyeu, Viktar, 2013. "Recognising ecological and institutional landscapes in adaptive governance of natural resources," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 87-97.
    14. Meng, Jijun & Cheng, Haoran & Li, Feng & Han, Ziyan & Wei, Chanjuan & Wu, Yingdi & You, Ng Wuh & Zhu, Likai, 2022. "Spatial-temporal trade-offs of land multi-functionality and function zoning at finer township scale in the middle reaches of the Heihe River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Manjiang Shi & Yaowen Xie & Qi Cao, 2016. "Spatiotemporal Changes in Rural Settlement Land and Rural Population in the Middle Basin of the Heihe River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-17, June.
    16. Guanglong Dong & Wenxin Zhang & Xinliang Xu & Kun Jia, 2021. "Multi-Dimensional Feature Recognition and Policy Implications of Rural Human–Land Relationships in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Kun Ge & Shan Zou & Xinhai Lu & Shangan Ke & Danling Chen & Zhangsheng Liu, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution and the Mechanism behind the Coupling Coordination Relationship between Industrial Integration and Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Economic Zone in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Ekpodessi, Serge Gérard N. & Nakamura, Hitoshi, 2018. "Land use and management in Benin Republic: An evaluation of the effectiveness of Land Law 2013-01," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 61-69.
    19. Yaojin Zhou & Yao Shen & Xuexi Yang & Zhifang Wang & Liyan Xu, 2021. "Where to Revitalize, and How? A Rural Typology Zoning for China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Shi, Linna & Wang, Yongsheng, 2021. "Evolution characteristics and driving factors of negative decoupled rural residential land and resident population in the Yellow River Basin," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    21. Kai Ren, 2021. "Following Rural Functions to Classify Rural Sites: An Application in Jixi, Anhui Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-35, April.
    22. Tianqi He & Weifeng Qiao & Kaiyang Jia & Yibei Chai & Yi Hu & Pan Sun & Yahua Wang & Ting Feng, 2020. "Selecting Rural Development Paths Based on Village Multifunction: A Case of Jingjiang City, China," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-15, October.
    23. Charnes, Abraham & Cooper, William W. & Li, Shanling, 1989. "Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 325-344.
    24. Chi, Guangqing & Ho, Hung Chak, 2018. "Population stress: A spatiotemporal analysis of population change and land development at the county level in the contiguous United States, 2001–2011," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 128-137.
    25. Chen, Hongxia & Zhao, Luming & Zhao, Zhenyu, 2017. "Influencing factors of farmers’ willingness to withdraw from rural homesteads: A survey in zhejiang, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 524-530.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yifang Wang & Linlin Cheng & Yang Zheng, 2023. "An Adjusted Landscape Ecological Security of Cultivated Land Evaluation Method Based on the Interaction between Cultivated Land and Surrounding Land Types," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yichi Zhang & Kai Xue & Huimin Cao & Yingen Hu, 2023. "The Non-Linear Relationship between the Number of Permanent Residents and the Willingness of Rural Residential Land Transfer: The Threshold Effect of per Capita Net Income," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, August.
    2. Mengchao Yao & Yihua Zhang, 2021. "Evaluation and Optimization of Urban Land-Use Efficiency: A Case Study in Sichuan Province of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Wen, Qi & Li, Jin & Ding, Jinmei & Wang, Jue, 2023. "Evolutionary process and mechanism of population hollowing out in rural villages in the farming-pastoral ecotone of Northern China: A case study of Yanchi County, Ningxia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Jiwei Li & Qingqing Ye & Weiqiang Chen & Xuesong Kong & Qingsheng Bi & Jie Lu & Enxiang Cai & Hejie Wei & Xinwei Feng & Yulong Guo, 2022. "An Analysis Method of Quantitative Coupling Rationality between Urban–Rural Construction Land and Population: A Case Study of Henan Province in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    5. Jichang Cui & Yanbo Qu & Yan Li & Lingyun Zhan & Guancheng Guo & Xiaozhen Dong, 2022. "Reconstruction of Rural Settlement Patterns in China: The Role of Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.
    7. Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    8. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    9. Glover, Fred & Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki, 2009. "Contributions of Professor William W. Cooper in Operations Research and Management Science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 1-16, August.
    10. Ozcan, Yasar A., 1995. "Efficiency of hospital service production in local markets: The balance sheet of U.S. medical armament," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 139-150, June.
    11. Chandra, Pankaj & Cooper, William W. & Li, Shanling & Rahman, Atiqur, 1998. "Using DEA To evaluate 29 Canadian textile companies -- Considering returns to scale," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 129-141, January.
    12. Pei-Pei Jiang & Yuan Wang & Jin Luo & Lin Zhu & Rui Shi & Song Hu & Xiaodong Zhu, 2023. "Measuring static and dynamic industrial eco-efficiency in China based on the MinDS–Malmquist–Luenberger model," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 5241-5261, June.
    13. Yuxiang Tan & Mingshun Xiang & Haixia Lu & Linsen Duan & Jin Yang & Jiake Meng & Ao Li & Lanlan Deng, 2023. "Spatial Difference Studies and Driving Force Analysis of Rural Settlements in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Yu, Peiheng & Fennell, Shailaja & Chen, Yiyun & Liu, Hui & Xu, Lu & Pan, Jiawei & Bai, Shaoyun & Gu, Shixiang, 2022. "Positive impacts of farmland fragmentation on agricultural production efficiency in Qilu Lake watershed: Implications for appropriate scale management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Maria Francesca Cracolici & Peter Nijkamp & Miranda Cuffaro, 2007. "Efficiency and Productivity of Italian Tourist Destinations: A Quantitative Estimation Based on Data Envelopment Analysis and the Malmquist Method," Springer Books, in: Álvaro Matias & Peter Nijkamp & Paulo Neto (ed.), Advances in Modern Tourism Research, chapter 0, pages 325-343, Springer.
    16. Chen, Yi & Long, Xingle & Salman, Muhammad, 2021. "Did the 2014 Nanjing Youth Olympic Games enhance environmental efficiency? New evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    17. Peizhen Wang & Ligang Lyu & Jiangang Xu, 2021. "Factors Influencing Rural Households’ Decision-Making Behavior on Residential Relocation: Willingness and Destination," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Ajishnu Roy & Aman Basu & Xuhui Dong, 2021. "Achieving Socioeconomic Development Fuelled by Globalization: An Analysis of 146 Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Guanglong Dong & Wenxin Zhang & Xinliang Xu & Kun Jia, 2021. "Multi-Dimensional Feature Recognition and Policy Implications of Rural Human–Land Relationships in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Yiming Hou & Guanwen Yin & Yanbin Chen, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Financial Pressure and Industrial Ecological Efficiency of Resource-Based Cities in China: Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Impact Mechanism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-18, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9059-:d:870261. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.