IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i11p6272-d567321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Establish a Sustainable Organization? A Study on the Relationship between Social Work Characteristics and Innovativeness for Employees of Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Jui-Chung Kao

    (Institute of Marine Affairs and Business Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung 80778, Taiwan)

  • Hsiang-Yu Ma

    (Department of Ocean and Border Governance, National Quemoy University, Kinmen 892, Taiwan)

  • Nein-Tsu Chiang

    (Department of Ocean and Border Governance, National Quemoy University, Kinmen 892, Taiwan)

  • Rui-Hsin Kao

    (Department of Ocean and Border Governance, National Quemoy University, Kinmen 892, Taiwan)

  • Cheng-Chung Cho

    (Department of Ocean and Border Governance, National Quemoy University, Kinmen 892, Taiwan)

Abstract

The shaping of employees’ innovativeness is an important way of building a sustainable organization. Therefore, in order to have a sustainable police organization, the innovativeness of the police must be established in order to achieve the objective of maintaining law and order. In this study, Taiwan’s first-line border police officers served as the research subject, and the cross-level model perspective was adopted to investigate their innovativeness from task-oriented and socially oriented viewpoints. At the same time, investigations were made into the cross-level direct and indirect effects of social work characteristics and collective efficacy toward police officers’ self-efficacy and innovativeness. A multilevel model was adopted to analyze the quantitative data obtained with 249 border police officers in Taiwan as the research objects. The results showed that social work characteristics have a positive influence on collective efficacy, and motivational work characteristics have a positive influence on employees’ self-efficacy and innovativeness. Their self-efficacy showed a positive influence on innovativeness, and a mediating effect on the relationship between motivational work characteristics and innovativeness. Moreover, social work characteristics and collective efficacy have a cross-level contextual effect on self-efficacy and innovativeness, while social work characteristics and self-efficacy have a cross-level interaction on police officers’ innovativeness. In general, this study confirmed the importance of employees’ innovativeness for the establishment of a sustainable police organization. The characteristics of social and motivational work, self-efficacy, and collective effectiveness are important variables for establishing employees’ innovativeness.

Suggested Citation

  • Jui-Chung Kao & Hsiang-Yu Ma & Nein-Tsu Chiang & Rui-Hsin Kao & Cheng-Chung Cho, 2021. "How to Establish a Sustainable Organization? A Study on the Relationship between Social Work Characteristics and Innovativeness for Employees of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6272-:d:567321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6272/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/11/6272/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Fagerberg & Bengt-Åke Lundvall & Martin Srholec, 2018. "Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(3), pages 533-556, July.
    2. Ben Youssef, Adel & Boubaker, Sabri & Omri, Anis, 2018. "Entrepreneurship and sustainability: The need for innovative and institutional solutions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 232-241.
    3. Alexandra Marcos & María del Carmen Pérez-Llantada & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Integration in the Organizational Environment of the Spanish National Police," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Stephenson, R. & Baschieri, A. & Clements, S. & Hennink, M. & Madise, N., 2006. "Contextual influences on the use of health facilities for childbirth in Africa," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(1), pages 84-93.
    5. De, Debashree & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Ghosh, Sadhan Kumar, 2020. "Impact of Lean and Sustainability Oriented Innovation on Sustainability Performance of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Data Envelopment Analysis-based framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 416-430.
    6. Isabella Bonacci & Andrea Mazzitelli & Donato Morea, 2020. "Evaluating Climate between Working Excellence and Organizational Innovation: What Comes First?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    7. Jennifer González-Blanco & Jose Luis Coca-Pérez & Manuel Guisado-González, 2018. "The Contribution of Technological and Non-Technological Innovation to Environmental Performance. An Analysis with a Complementary Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, November.
    8. Nguyen Thi Canh & Nguyen Thanh Liem & Phung Anh Thu & Nguyen Vinh Khuong, 2019. "The Impact of Innovation on the Firm Performance and Corporate Social Responsibility of Vietnamese Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Tamás Bányai & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan, 2019. "An Examination of Sustainable HRM Practices on Job Performance: An Application of Training as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Paul Jiménez & Bianca Winkler & Anita Bregenzer, 2017. "Developing Sustainable Workplaces with Leadership: Feedback about Organizational Working Conditions to Support Leaders in Health-Promoting Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    11. Nguyen Thi Oanh, 2019. "The Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type and Innovation Performance in FDI Enterprises in Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    12. Andrea Zammitti & Paola Magnano & Giuseppe Santisi, 2020. "“Work and Surroundings”: A Training to Enhance Career Curiosity, Self-Efficacy, and the Perception of Work and Decent Work in Adolescents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-14, August.
    13. Mihyoung Kwon & Jihyun Oh, 2021. "Mediating Effects of Family Stress on the Relationship between Self-Efficacy and Midlife Crisis in Middle-Aged Men," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, March.
    14. Xuhua Hu & Bertha Ada Danso & Isaac Adjei Mensah & Michael Addai, 2020. "Does Innovation Type Influence Firm Performance? A Dilemma of Star-Rated Hotels in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Karen A. Bantel & Susan E. Jackson, 1989. "Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(S1), pages 107-124, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuhua Hu & Bertha Ada Danso & Isaac Adjei Mensah & Michael Addai, 2020. "Does Innovation Type Influence Firm Performance? A Dilemma of Star-Rated Hotels in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    2. Alexandra Marcos & María del Carmen Pérez-Llantada & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "Integration in the Organizational Environment of the Spanish National Police," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Van Huong, Vu & Mai, Yong & Hau, Bui Duc & Cuong, Ly Kim & Van Dao, Le, 2023. "Do firm characteristics in their local context promote corporate ecological and social responsibility? Evidence from a multi-hierarchical analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 722-743.
    4. Jae Wook Yoo & Richard Reed & Shung Jae Shin & David J. Lemak, 2009. "Strategic Choice and Performance in Late Movers: Influence of the Top Management Team's External Ties," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 308-335, March.
    5. Meghamrita Chakraborty, 2023. "Linking Migration, Diversity and Regional Development in India," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 8(1), pages 55-72, January.
    6. Veltrop, D.B. & Hermes, C.L.M. & Postma, T.J.B.M. & de Haan, J., 2012. "A tale of two factions," Research Report 12001-HRM&OB, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    7. Patzelt, Holger & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, Dodo & Fischer, Heiko T., 2009. "Upper echelons and portfolio strategies of venture capital firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 558-572, November.
    8. Auh, Seigyoung & Menguc, Bulent & Fisher, Michelle & Haddad, Abeer, 2011. "The perceived autonomy–perceived service climate relationship: The contingency effect of store-level tenure diversity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(6), pages 509-520.
    9. Olson, Bradley J. & Bao, Yongjian & Parayitam, Satyanarayana, 2007. "Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: The effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 35-46, March.
    10. repec:dgr:rugsom:12001-hrmob is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Pierpaolo Parrotta & Dario Pozzoli & Mariola Pytlikova, 2014. "The nexus between labor diversity and firm’s innovation," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 303-364, April.
    12. Mohammadi, Ali & Broström, Anders & Franzoni, Chiara, 2015. "Work Force Composition and Innovation: How Diversity in Employees’ Ethnical and Disciplinary Backgrounds Facilitates Knowledge Re-combination," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 413, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
    13. Short, Jeremy C. & Palmer, Timothy B., 2003. "Organizational performance referents: An empirical examination of their content and influences," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 209-224, March.
    14. George A Shinkle & Jo-Ann Suchard, 2019. "Innovation in newly public firms: The influence of government grants, venture capital, and private equity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(2), pages 248-281, May.
    15. Isabel Marques & Zélia Serrasqueiro & Fernanda Nogueira, 2021. "Managers’ Competences in Private Hospitals for Investment Decisions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Mariem Jaafra & Houssem Rachd, 2022. "Education and Economic Growth: ıs There a Role for Governance? a Comparison between MENA and OECD Countries," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 10(4), pages 236-251.
    17. Marte C.W. Solheim & Ron Boschma & Sverre Herstad, 2018. "Related variety, unrelated variety and the novelty content of firm innovation in urban and non-urban locations," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1836, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2018.
    18. Nicodemus M. Mutinda & James M. Kilika, 2019. "TMT Cognitive Capability and Organizational Outcomes: A Theoretical Review," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 31-52, August.
    19. Nadia Loukil & Ouidad Yousfi, 2022. "Do CEO’s traits matter in innovation outcomes?," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 375-403, September.
    20. María Lourdes Arco-Castro & María Victoria Lopez-Pérez & Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Raquel Garde-Sánchez, 2020. "Do Stakeholders Modulate Philanthropic Strategy? Corporate Philanthropy as Stakeholders’ Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    21. Berger, Allen N. & Kick, Thomas & Schaeck, Klaus, 2014. "Executive board composition and bank risk taking," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 48-65.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:11:p:6272-:d:567321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.