IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v11y2019i8p28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type and Innovation Performance in FDI Enterprises in Vietnam

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Thi Oanh

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of innovation capability on types of innovation and innovation performance in foreign direct investment enterprises in Vietnam. The study uses quantitative analysis (Cronbach Alpha, CFA, SEM) with survey data from structured questionnaires. The analysis results from investigating 254 enterprises in Vietnam show that there is a clear influence of innovative capability on four types of innovation- (1) organizational innovation; (2) process innovation; (3) product / service innovation and (4) marketing innovation. Improving the types of innovation in enterprises also affects the innovation performance of enterprises the results also provide important implications for businesses that need to focus on innovation culture in enterprises, form and select business strategies based on innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Thi Oanh, 2019. "The Relationship between Innovation Capability, Innovation Type and Innovation Performance in FDI Enterprises in Vietnam," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/39873/40934
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/39873
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chien-Tzu Tsai & Wan-Fen Liao, 2014. "A Framework For Open Innovation Assessment," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1-28.
    2. R. Veugelers, 2008. "The Role of SMEs in Innovation in the EU. A Case for Policy Intervention?," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 239-262.
    3. Hagedoorn, John & Cloodt, Myriam, 2003. "Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(8), pages 1365-1379, September.
    4. van der Aa, Wietze & Elfring, Tom, 2002. "Realizing innovation in services," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 155-171, June.
    5. Antoncic, Bostjan & Hisrich, Robert D., 2001. "Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 495-527, September.
    6. Rob Bilderbeek & Pim den Hertog, 1998. "Technology-Based Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in the Netherlands: Their Significance as a Driving Force behind Knowledge-Driven Innovation," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 67(2), pages 126-138.
    7. Furman, Jeffrey L. & Porter, Michael E. & Stern, Scott, 2002. "The determinants of national innovative capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 899-933, August.
    8. Gülşen Akman & Cengiz Yilmaz, 2008. "Innovative Capability, Innovation Strategy And Market Orientation: An Empirical Analysis In Turkish Software Industry," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(01), pages 69-111.
    9. Oecd, 2002. "Access for Business," OECD Digital Economy Papers 67, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tulus Suryanto & Darul Dimasqy & Reza Ronaldo & Mahjus Ekananda & Teuku Heru Dinata & Indra Tumbelaka, 2020. "The Influence of Liberalization on Innovation, Performance, and Competition Level of Insurance Industry in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Xuhua Hu & Bertha Ada Danso & Isaac Adjei Mensah & Michael Addai, 2020. "Does Innovation Type Influence Firm Performance? A Dilemma of Star-Rated Hotels in Ghana," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Khleef A. Alkhawaldeh, 2021. "The Impact of Innovation on Profitability of Jordanian Services Companies," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(1), pages 1-92, August.
    4. Jui-Chung Kao & Hsiang-Yu Ma & Nein-Tsu Chiang & Rui-Hsin Kao & Cheng-Chung Cho, 2021. "How to Establish a Sustainable Organization? A Study on the Relationship between Social Work Characteristics and Innovativeness for Employees of Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edquist , Charles & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia , Jon Mikel, 2015. "The Innovation Union Scoreboard is flawed: The Case of Sweden – not the innovation leader of the EU – updated version," Papers in Innovation Studies 2015/27, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    2. Hu, Mei-Chih & Mathews, John A., 2005. "National innovative capacity in East Asia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1322-1349, November.
    3. Hamidi, Shima & Zandiatashbar, Ahoura & Bonakdar, Ahmad, 2019. "The relationship between regional compactness and regional innovation capacity (RIC): Empirical evidence from a national study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 394-402.
    4. Choi, Jin-Uk & Lee, Chang-Yang, 2022. "The differential effects of basic research on firm R&D productivity: The conditioning role of technological diversification," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Zhao, Shu Liang & Song, Wei & Zhu, Dong Yun & Peng, Xiao Bao & Cai, Wenjing, 2013. "Evaluating China's regional collaboration innovation capability from the innovation actors perspective—An AHP and cluster analytical approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 182-190.
    6. Barbero, Javier & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Zofío, José L., 2021. "Is more always better? On the relevance of decreasing returns to scale on innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Marina Van Geenhuizen & Pieter Stek, 2015. "Mapping innovation in the global photovoltaic industry: a bibliometric approach to cluster identification and analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa15p697, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Hua Gao & Zhenghao Meng, 2023. "Research on the Spillover Effect of Different Types of Technological Innovation on New Energy Industry: Taking China’s Solar Photovoltaic as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Rakesh B. Sambharya & Jooh Lee, 2014. "Renewing Dynamic Capabilities Globally: An Empirical Study of the World’s Largest MNCs," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 137-169, April.
    10. Crosby, Lawrence A. & Ghanbarpour, Tohid, 2023. "The Drucker intangibles measurement system: An academic perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    11. Maliki, Samir & Sour, Ouieme, 2019. "Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and Technological Capacity: A Regression Analysis on Some European and Emerging Countries," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205197, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    12. Li, Xibao, 2009. "China's regional innovation capacity in transition: An empirical approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 338-357, March.
    13. Maciej Zastempowski & Aranka Ignasiak-Szulc & Szymon Cyfert, 2020. "Conditions of Marketing and Organizational Innovation of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 163-173.
    14. Mei-Chih Hu & Ching-Yan Wu & Jung Hoon Lee & Yun-Chu Lu, 2014. "The influence of knowledge source and ambidexterity in the thin film transistor and liquid crystal display industry: evidence from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 233-260, May.
    15. Hu, Mei-Chih, 2012. "Technological innovation capabilities in the thin film transistor-liquid crystal display industries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 541-555.
    16. Aneta Bobeni? Hinto?ová & Michaela Bruothová, 2019. "A link between innovation performance and inward foreign direct investments: A case of Slovakia," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 9812114, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    17. Boly, Vincent & Morel, Laure & Assielou, N’Doli Guillaume & Camargo, Mauricio, 2014. "Evaluating innovative processes in french firms: Methodological proposition for firm innovation capacity evaluation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 608-622.
    18. Stek, Pieter E. & van Geenhuizen, Marina S., 2016. "The influence of international research interaction on national innovation performance: A bibliometric approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 61-70.
    19. Zhu Weimin & Muhammad Zubair Chishti & Abdul Rehman & Manzoor Ahmad, 2022. "A pathway toward future sustainability: Assessing the influence of innovation shocks on CO2 emissions in developing economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 4786-4809, April.
    20. Shuai Liu & Xiao-Yu Xu & Kai Zhao & Li-Ming Xiao & Qi Li, 2021. "Understanding the Complexity of Regional Innovation Capacity Dynamics in China: From the Perspective of Hidden Markov Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:11:y:2019:i:8:p:28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.