IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i24p7095-d296635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Angela Neves

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
    University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Radu Godina

    (UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal)

  • Susana G. Azevedo

    (University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
    CEFAGE—Department of Business and Economics, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal)

  • Carina Pimentel

    (UNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology (FCT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
    GOVCOPP and DEGEIT, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • João C.O. Matias

    (GOVCOPP and DEGEIT, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

Abstract

Industrial symbiosis, which is characterised mainly by the reuse of waste from one company as raw material by another, has been applied worldwide with recognised environmental, economic, and social benefits. However, the potential for industrial symbiosis is not exhausted in existing cases, and there is still a wide range of opportunities for its application. Through a comprehensive literature review, this article aims to compile and analyse studies that focus on potential industrial symbiosis in real contexts, to highlight the margin of optimisation that is not being used. The cases reported in the publications identified here were characterised and analysed according to geographic location, type of economic activity, waste/by-products, main benefits, and the methods employed in the studies. From this analysis, we conclude that there is great potential for applications involving industrial symbiosis throughout the world, and especially in Europe, corresponding to 53% of the total cases analysed. Manufacturing stood out as the sector with the highest potential for establishing symbiosis relationships, and the most common types of waste streams in potential networks were organic, plastic and rubber, wood, and metallic materials. This article also discusses the main drivers and barriers to realising the potential of industrial symbiosis. The diversity of industries, geographical proximity, facilitating entities and legislation, plans, and policies are shown to be the main drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7095-:d:296635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/24/7095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulo Ribeiro & Fernando Fonseca & Carolina Neiva & Tiziana Bardi & Júlia M. Lourenço, 2018. "An integrated approach towards transforming an industrial park into an eco-industrial park: the case of Salaise-Sablons," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(2), pages 195-213, January.
    2. Dick van Beers & Albena Bossilkov & Glen Corder & Rene van Berkel, 2007. "Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 55-72, January.
    3. Gao, Tianming & Shen, Lei & Shen, Ming & Liu, Litao & Chen, Fengnan & Gao, Li, 2017. "Evolution and projection of CO2 emissions for China's cement industry from 1980 to 2020," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 522-537.
    4. Simboli, Alberto & Taddeo, Raffaella & Morgante, Anna, 2015. "The potential of Industrial Ecology in agri-food clusters (AFCs): A case study based on valorisation of auxiliary materials," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 65-75.
    5. Johansson, Maria T. & Söderström, Mats, 2011. "Options for the Swedish steel industry – Energy efficiency measures and fuel conversion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 191-198.
    6. R. Husgafvel & H. Nordlund & J. Heino & M. Mäkelä & G. Watkins & O. Dahl & I.-L. Paavola, 2016. "Use of Symbiosis Products from Integrated Pulp and Paper and Carbon Steel Mills: Legal Status and Environmental Burdens," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(5), pages 1187-1198, October.
    7. Marian Chertow & John Ehrenfeld, 2012. "Organizing Self‐Organizing Systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 13-27, February.
    8. John A. Mathews & Hao Tan, 2011. "Progress Toward a Circular Economy in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 15(3), pages 435-457, June.
    9. Taddeo, Raffaella & Simboli, Alberto & Morgante, Anna & Erkman, Suren, 2017. "The Development of Industrial Symbiosis in Existing Contexts. Experiences From Three Italian Clusters," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 55-67.
    10. Luca Fraccascia & Ilaria Giannoccaro & Vito Albino, 2017. "Efficacy of Landfill Tax and Subsidy Policies for the Emergence of Industrial Symbiosis Networks: An Agent-Based Simulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Marian Chertow & Weslynne Ashton & Juan Espinosa, 2008. "Industrial Symbiosis in Puerto Rico: Environmentally Related Agglomeration Economies," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(10), pages 1299-1312.
    12. Paul D. Jensen & Lauren Basson & Emma E. Hellawell & Matthew Leach, 2012. "‘Habitat’ Suitability Index Mapping for Industrial Symbiosis Planning," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 38-50, February.
    13. Liu, Zhe & Adams, Michelle & Cote, Raymond P. & Geng, Yong & Chen, Qinghua & Liu, Weili & Sun, Lu & Yu, Xiaoman, 2017. "Comprehensive development of industrial symbiosis for the response of greenhouse gases emission mitigation: Challenges and opportunities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 88-95.
    14. Fang, Kai & Dong, Liang & Ren, Jingzheng & Zhang, Qifeng & Han, Ling & Fu, Huizhen, 2017. "Carbon footprints of urban transition: Tracking circular economy promotions in Guiyang, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 365(C), pages 30-44.
    15. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    16. Milda Malinauskienė & Irina Kliopova & Christoph Hugi & Jurgis Kazimieras Staniškis, 2018. "Geostrategic Supply Risk and Economic Importance as Drivers for Implementation of Industrial Ecology Measures in a Nitrogen Fertilizer Production Company," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 22(2), pages 422-433, April.
    17. Yasunori Kikuchi & Yuichiro Kanematsu & Masamichi Ugo & Yosuke Hamada & Tatsuya Okubo, 2016. "Industrial Symbiosis Centered on a Regional Cogeneration Power Plant Utilizing Available Local Resources: A Case Study of Tanegashima," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 20(2), pages 276-288, April.
    18. Marian R. Chertow, 2007. "“Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 11-30, January.
    19. Rasmi Patnaik & Gopalsamy Poyyamoli, 2015. "Developing an eco-industrial park in Puducherry region, India - a SWOT analysis," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(6), pages 976-996, June.
    20. Shishir Kumar Behera & Song-Hwa Chae & Han-Koo Yeo & Hung-Suck Park, 2015. "Enhancement of Eco-production Capacity in Chittagong Export Processing Zone (CEPZ), Bangladesh, Employing Korean EIP Transition Strategy," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: S. Mahendra Dev & Sudhakar Yedla (ed.), Cities and Sustainability, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 63-80, Springer.
    21. Anu Ramaswami & Kangkang Tong & Andrew Fang & Raj M. Lal & Ajay Singh Nagpure & Yang Li & Huajun Yu & Daqian Jiang & Armistead G. Russell & Lei Shi & Marian Chertow & Yangjun Wang & Shuxiao Wang, 2017. "Urban cross-sector actions for carbon mitigation with local health co-benefits in China," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(10), pages 736-742, October.
    22. Hui Wang & Xuegong Xu & Gaoru Zhu, 2015. "Landscape Changes and a Salt Production Sustainable Approach in the State of Salt Pan Area Decreasing on the Coast of Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-20, July.
    23. Jooyoung Park & Juanita Duque-Hernández & Nohora Díaz-Posada, 2018. "Facilitating Business Collaborations for Industrial Symbiosis: The Pilot Experience of the Sustainable Industrial Network Program in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    24. Weslynne S. Ashton, 2009. "The Structure, Function, and Evolution of a Regional Industrial Ecosystem," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(2), pages 228-246, April.
    25. Suzanna ElMassah, 2018. "Industrial symbiosis within eco‐industrial parks: Sustainable development for Borg El‐Arab in Egypt," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 884-892, November.
    26. Weslynne S. Ashton & Ariana C. Bain, 2012. "Assessing the “Short Mental Distance” in Eco‐Industrial Networks," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 70-82, February.
    27. Judy Kincaid & Michael Overcash, 2001. "Industrial Ecosystem Development at the Metropolitan Level," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 5(1), pages 117-126, January.
    28. Larissa A. R. U. Freitas & Alessandra Magrini, 2017. "Waste Management in Industrial Construction: Investigating Contributions from Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-17, July.
    29. Dong, Liang & Gu, Fumei & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu & Gao, Jie, 2014. "Uncovering opportunity of low-carbon city promotion with industrial system innovation: Case study on industrial symbiosis projects in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 388-397.
    30. Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté, 2017. "A Framework for Integrating Ecosystem Services into China’s Circular Economy: The Case of Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    31. Weslynne S. Ashton, 2011. "Managing Performance Expectations of Industrial Symbiosis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 297-309, July.
    32. Liudmila Kokoulina & Liubov Ermolaeva & Samuli Patala & Paavo Ritala, 2019. "Championing processes and the emergence of industrial symbiosis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 528-539, April.
    33. Dong, Liang & Liang, Hanwei & Zhang, Liguo & Liu, Zhaowen & Gao, Zhiqiu & Hu, Mingming, 2017. "Highlighting regional eco-industrial development: Life cycle benefits of an urban industrial symbiosis and implications in China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 361(C), pages 164-176.
    34. Mina Nasiri & Tero Rantala & Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko & Hannu Rantanen, 2018. "Transition towards Sustainable Solutions: Product, Service, Technology, and Business Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, January.
    35. Liu, Zhe & Adams, Michelle & Cote, Raymond P. & Chen, Qinghua & Wu, Rui & Wen, Zongguo & Liu, Weili & Dong, Liang, 2018. "How does circular economy respond to greenhouse gas emissions reduction: An analysis of Chinese plastic recycling industries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1162-1169.
    36. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & João C. O. Matias, 2019. "Current Status, Emerging Challenges, and Future Prospects of Industrial Symbiosis in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    37. Olli Salmi & Janne Hukkinen & Jyrki Heino & Nani Pajunen & Maaria Wierink, 2012. "Governing the Interplay between Industrial Ecosystems and Environmental Regulation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(1), pages 119-128, February.
    38. Artem Golev & Glen D. Corder & Damien P. Giurco, 2015. "Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis: Insights from the Use of a Maturity Grid," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(1), pages 141-153, February.
    39. Marian Chertow & Yuko Miyata, 2011. "Assessing collective firm behavior: comparing industrial symbiosis with possible alternatives for individual companies in Oahu, HI," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 266-280, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & João C. O. Matias, 2019. "Current Status, Emerging Challenges, and Future Prospects of Industrial Symbiosis in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Rui Castro & João Azevedo, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis: A Sectoral Analysis on Enablers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Efrain Boom-Cárcamo & Rita Peñabaena-Niebles, 2022. "Analysis of the Development of Industrial Symbiosis in Emerging and Frontier Market Countries: Barriers and Drivers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-32, April.
    4. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    6. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    7. Ilaria Giannoccaro & Valeria Zaza & Luca Fraccascia, 2023. "Designing regional industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Apulia region," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1475-1514, June.
    8. Juan Diego Henriques & João Azevedo & Rui Dias & Marco Estrela & Cristina Ascenço & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller, 2022. "Implementing Industrial Symbiosis Incentives: an Applied Assessment Framework for Risk Mitigation," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    9. John Rincón-Moreno & Marta Ormazabal & Maria J. Álvarez & Carmen Jaca, 2020. "Shortcomings of Transforming a Local Circular Economy System through Industrial Symbiosis: A Case Study in Spanish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Fraccascia, Luca, 2020. "Quantifying the direct network effect for online platforms supporting industrial symbiosis: an agent-based simulation study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    11. Fraccascia, Luca & Yazan, Devrim Murat & Albino, Vito & Zijm, Henk, 2020. "The role of redundancy in industrial symbiotic business development: A theoretical framework explored by agent-based simulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    12. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    13. Fraccascia, Luca & Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Albino, Vito, 2021. "Ecosystem indicators for measuring industrial symbiosis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    14. Tian Yang & Changhao Liu & Raymond P. Côté & Jinwen Ye & Weifeng Liu, 2022. "Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Winans, K. & Kendall, A. & Deng, H., 2017. "The history and current applications of the circular economy concept," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 825-833.
    16. Glen D. Corder & Artem Golev & Julian Fyfe & Sarah King, 2014. "The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Fabiana Liar Agudo & Barbara Stolte Bezerra & José Alcides Gobbo & Luis Alberto Bertolucci Paes, 2022. "Unfolding research themes for industrial symbiosis and underlying theories," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1682-1702, December.
    18. Yang Liu & Peng Cheng & Li Hu, 2022. "How do justice and top management beliefs matter in industrial symbiosis collaboration: An exploratory study from China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 891-906, June.
    19. Lovisa Harfeldt-Berg & Sarah Broberg & Karin Ericsson, 2022. "The Importance of Individual Actor Characteristics and Contextual Aspects for Promoting Industrial Symbiosis Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Tran Thi Mai Thanh & Do Dieu Huong & Nguyen Duc Long & Nguyen Duy Dat & Mai Thanh Huyen & Hoang Cao Cuong, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Eco-Industrial Parks in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thang Long II Industrial Park in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:24:p:7095-:d:296635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.