IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jrisks/v9y2021i12p220-d693493.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Partners’ Behavior in the Rural E-Payment Market of China

Author

Listed:
  • Jerzy Witold Wiśniewski

    (Department of Econometrics and Statistics, Nicholas Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Ewelina Sokołowska

    (Department of Corporate Finance, University of Gdansk, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland)

  • Jinghua Wu

    (Post-Doctoral Research Station of Management of Farming & Forestry, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 610000, China)

  • Anna Dziadkiewicz

    (Department of Marketing, University of Gdansk, 80-309 Gdańsk, Poland)

Abstract

The rural e-payment market in China is becoming one of the important topics in the research field because of its contribution to the efficiency of fund flows in the economy. Further development of the rural e-payment market mainly depends on its partners’ acceptance. In March 2020, 776.08 million people were using mobile payments in China. After the COVID-19 pandemic in China, the Payment and Clearing Association of China launched an action to encourage citizens to use mobile payments. In this article evolutionary game theory is presented. The benefits of e-payments between financial institutions and users are studied. Based on the analysis of the partners’ selection of costs and profits as well as other factors, important conclusions were drawn. The growth of the rural economy is beneficial to the change of the partners’ behavior in the rural e-payment market. Dynamic evolution of the partners’ behavior makes the supply and demand for rural e-payment services consistent. In order to create more benefits, financial institutions will lead the move to merge the rural e-payment market with the China National Advanced Payment System. These research results are beneficial for its growth by developing strategies to encourage more partners to take part in the rural e-payment market in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Jerzy Witold Wiśniewski & Ewelina Sokołowska & Jinghua Wu & Anna Dziadkiewicz, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of the Partners’ Behavior in the Rural E-Payment Market of China," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:12:p:220-:d:693493
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/12/220/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/9/12/220/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Mailath, 1998. "Corrigenda [Do People Play Nash Equilibrium? Lessons from Evolutionary Game Theory]," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(4), pages 1941-1941, December.
    2. Beck, Thorsten & Lu, Liping & Yang, Rudai, 2015. "Finance and Growth for Microenterprises: Evidence from Rural China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 38-56.
    3. Efraim Turban & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2015. "Electronic Commerce Payment Systems," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Electronic Commerce, edition 0, chapter 11, pages 519-557, Springer.
    4. Elsner, Wolfram & Heinrich, Torsten & Schwardt, Henning, 2014. "The Microeconomics of Complex Economies," Elsevier Monographs, Elsevier, edition 1, number 9780124115859.
    5. Mark Schreiner & Héctor Horacio Colombet, 2001. "From Urban to Rural: Lessons for Microfinance from Argentina," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 19(3), pages 339-354, September.
    6. Efraim Turban & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2015. "Retailing in Electronic Commerce: Products and Services," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Electronic Commerce, edition 0, chapter 3, pages 103-159, Springer.
    7. Efraim Turban & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2015. "Overview of Electronic Commerce," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, in: Electronic Commerce, edition 0, chapter 1, pages 3-49, Springer.
    8. repec:zbw:bofitp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201504131154 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Li Gan & Zhichao Yin & Jijun Tan, 2016. "Report on the Development of Household Finance in Rural China (2014)," Springer Books, Springer, edition 1, number 978-981-10-0409-4, September.
    10. repec:hhs:iuiwop:487 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Lipton, Michael, 1976. "Agricultural finance and rural credit in poor countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(7), pages 543-553, July.
    12. Xiaoming Zhu & Bingying Song & Yingzi Ni & Yifan Ren & Rui Li, 2016. "Business Trends in the Digital Era," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-10-1079-8, September.
    13. Erev, Ido & Roth, Alvin E, 1998. "Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(4), pages 848-881, September.
    14. Jorgen W. Weibull, 1997. "Evolutionary Game Theory," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262731215, December.
    15. Efraim Turban & David King & Jae Kyu Lee & Ting-Peng Liang & Deborrah C. Turban, 2015. "Electronic Commerce," Springer Texts in Business and Economics, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-319-10091-3, August.
    16. Hou, Xiaohui & Gao, Zhixian & Wang, Qing, 2016. "Internet finance development and banking market discipline: Evidence from China," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 88-100.
    17. Zacharoula Andreopoulou & Georgios Tsekouropoulos & Christiana Koliouska & Theodoros Koutroumanidis, 2014. "Internet marketing for sustainable development and rural tourism," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(4), pages 446-461.
    18. George J. Mailath, 1998. "Do People Play Nash Equilibrium? Lessons from Evolutionary Game Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1347-1374, September.
    19. Geoffrey Hodgson & Kainan Huang, 2012. "Evolutionary game theory and evolutionary economics: are they different species?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 345-366, April.
    20. Xiao, Tiaojun & Yu, Gang, 2006. "Supply chain disruption management and evolutionarily stable strategies of retailers in the quantity-setting duopoly situation with homogeneous goods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(2), pages 648-668, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tilman Slembeck, 2000. "Learning in Economics: Where Do We Stand?," Microeconomics 0004007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Jacob K. Goeree & Charles A. Holt, 2001. "Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1402-1422, December.
    3. Basuchoudhary, Atin & Allen, Sam & Siemers, Troy, 2008. "Civilization and the evolution of short sighted agents," MPRA Paper 11765, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Tassos Patokos, 2014. "Introducing Disappointment Dynamics and Comparing Behaviors in Evolutionary Games: Some Simulation Results," Games, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Roger A. McCain, 2000. "Road Rage: Imitative Learning Of Self-Destructive Behavior In An Agent-Based Simulation," Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 270, Society for Computational Economics.
    6. Benndorf, Volker & Martínez-Martínez, Ismael & Normann, Hans-Theo, 2021. "Games with coupled populations: An experiment in continuous time," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Kuperman, Ranan, 2011. "Coping with Conflict:A Dynamic Decision Making Perspective," NEPS Working Papers 3/2011, Network of European Peace Scientists.
    8. Rizzello Salvatore, 2002. "Mind and choice in economics," CESMEP Working Papers 200206, University of Turin.
    9. Teck H. Ho & Xin Wang & Colin F. Camerer, 2008. "Individual Differences in EWA Learning with Partial Payoff Information," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 118(525), pages 37-59, January.
    10. Daniel John Zizzo & Daniel Sgroi, 2001. "Bounded-Rational Behavior by Neural Networks in Normal Form Games," Economics Series Working Papers 2000-W30, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    11. Meng Ding & Hui Zeng, 2022. "Multi-Agent Evolutionary Game in the Recycling Utilization of Sulfate-Rich Wastewater," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-20, July.
    12. David Schüller & Thorsten Upmann, 2013. "When Focal Points are Out of Focus: A Game-Theoretic Analysis of Come Dine with Me," CESifo Working Paper Series 4138, CESifo.
    13. Sent, Esther-Mirjam, 2004. "The legacy of Herbert Simon in game theory," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 303-317, March.
    14. Alberto Locarno, 2012. "Monetary policy in a model with misspecified, heterogeneous and ever-changing expectations," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 888, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    15. Diego Iribarren, 2003. "From Economic Activity to Understanding Spaces," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2003_01, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    16. Michael Foley & Rory Smead & Patrick Forber & Christoph Riedl, 2021. "Avoiding the bullies: The resilience of cooperation among unequals," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Demichelis, Stefano & Ritzberger, Klaus, 2003. "From evolutionary to strategic stability," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 51-75, November.
    18. Gregor Schwerhoff, 2013. "Leadership and International Climate Cooperation," Working Papers 2013.97, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    19. Nobuyuki Hanaki, 2007. "Individual and Social Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 29(3), pages 421-421, May.
    20. Bodo Herzog & Stefanie Schnee, 2022. "Exploring a Dualism of Human Rationality: Experimental Study of a Cheating Contest Game," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jrisks:v:9:y:2021:i:12:p:220-:d:693493. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.