Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Road Rage: Imitative Learning Of Self-Destructive Behavior In An Agent-Based Simulation

Contents:

Author Info

  • Roger A. McCain

    (Drexel University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    A number of papers have studied imperfect imitative learning as a utility-increasing activity (e.g. Dawid, McCain 2000). Some studies of imitative learning have taken account of the tendency of people to imitate others who are "near" them in some sense (e.g. McCain 2000, Bala and Goyal). As Axtell observed, however, imitation may not be utility-increasing and may be motivated by quite different motives. Indeed, as McCain (1992) observed, imitation may lead to destructive and self-destructive behavior, as in road rage. Imitation may arise from a variety of motives, including simple conformism, a sense of common identity (McCain 1992), and fairness (Rabin) in the sense of reciprocity (Berg, Dickhaut, and McCabe). This multiplicity of motives lends itself to an "impulse-filtering" model (McCain, 1992) which would generate a probablistic choice function (Chen, Friedman, and Thisse). Whatever the motives, however, nearness (perhaps in social rather than physical space) would seem to be an important determinant of imitation.This paper reports simulations of a population of semi-rational agents playing a simple aggression-retaliation game in space. Their interactions are set in motion by random impulses to aggress. The decision to act on that impulse or not and to retaliate or not are determined by a series of probablistic filters, any one of which may suppress the impulse to aggress or to retaliate with a probability that depends on the recent experiences of the agent and her neighbors. The agents (victims of aggression) are situated at the cells of a cellular automaton and they can only perceive, and so be influenced by, the experiences of nearby neighbors.Simple as this model is, it may be used for policy assessment. To illustrate this, outcomes are compared with those of a modified game in which an external authority uses two kinds of strategies to restrain conflict. In one -- implemented by the Washington State Police in 1998 (Watson) -- the aggressors are penalized. In the alternative strategy, retaliators are penalized. Simulations are compared in order to project the relative effectiveness of the two penalty strategies.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://fmwww.bc.edu/cef00/papers/paper270.pdf
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Christopher F. Baum)
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Society for Computational Economics in its series Computing in Economics and Finance 2000 with number 270.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 05 Jul 2000
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:270

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: CEF 2000, Departament d'Economia i Empresa, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25,27, 08005, Barcelona, Spain
    Fax: +34 93 542 17 46
    Email:
    Web page: http://enginy.upf.es/SCE/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. George J. Mailath, 1998. "Do People Play Nash Equilibrium? Lessons from Evolutionary Game Theory," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1347-1374, September.
    2. Matthew Rabin., 1992. "Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics," Economics Working Papers 92-199, University of California at Berkeley.
    3. Hoffman, Elizabeth & McCabe, Kevin A & Smith, Vernon L, 1998. "Behavioral Foundations of Reciprocity: Experimental Economics and Evolutionary Psychology," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(3), pages 335-52, July.
    4. Fehr, Ernst & Kirchsteiger, George & Riedl, Arno, 1993. "Does Fairness Prevent Market Clearing? An Experimental Investigation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol. 108(2), pages 437-59, May.
    5. Erev, Ido & Roth, Alvin E, 1998. "Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(4), pages 848-81, September.
    6. David K Levine, 1997. "Modeling Altruism and Spitefulness in Experiments," Levine's Working Paper Archive 2047, David K. Levine.
    7. Sushil Bikhchandani & David Hirshleifer & Ivo Welch, 1998. "Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 12(3), pages 151-170, Summer.
    8. Wu, Lihua & Wang, Yuyun, 1998. "An Introduction to Simulated Annealing Algorithms for the Computation of Economic Equilibrium," Computational Economics, Society for Computational Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 151-69, October.
    9. Chen, Hsiao-Chi & Friedman, James W. & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 1997. "Boundedly Rational Nash Equilibrium: A Probabilistic Choice Approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 32-54, January.
    10. Goffe William L., 1996. "SIMANN: A Global Optimization Algorithm using Simulated Annealing," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(3), pages 1-9, October.
    11. Sugden, Robert, 1984. "Reciprocity: The Supply of Public Goods through Voluntary Contributions," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(376), pages 772-87, December.
    12. Sheffrin, S.M. & Triest, R.K., 1991. "Can Brute Deterrence Backfire? Perceptions and Attitudes in Taxpayer Compliance," Papers 373, California Davis - Institute of Governmental Affairs.
    13. Berg Joyce & Dickhaut John & McCabe Kevin, 1995. "Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 122-142, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sce:scecf0:270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.