IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i2p315-d1044707.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of UAVs for Land Use Planning of Brownfield Regeneration Projects-Case Study: Former Brick Factory, Cluj Napoca, Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Sanda Marioara Naș

    (Land Measurements and Cadaster Department, Faculty of Construction, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Mircea Vasile Bondrea

    (Land Measurements and Cadaster Department, Faculty of Construction, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Virgil Mihai Rădulescu

    (Land Measurements and Cadaster Department, Faculty of Construction, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Raluca Gâlgău

    (Department of Terrestrial Measurement and Cadastre, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400020 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Ioel Samuel Vereș

    (Land Measurements and Cadaster Department, Faculty of Construction, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Raluca Bondrea

    (MVB Topo Ltd., 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

  • Adrian Traian Rădulescu

    (Land Measurements and Cadaster Department, Faculty of Construction, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

Brownfields are a real problem which affects the urban appearance of cities and the quality of life of their inhabitants. In Romania, industrial areas were mainly concentrated on the outskirts of large cities, in the immediate vicinity of residential areas. With the closing of factories and the additional population of the big cities, there was a need for expansion of residential areas with a social-economic function. This paper proposes a case study from the classical surveying measurement equipment (GNSS—Global Navigation Satellite System and TS—Total Station) for land use planning of brownfield regeneration projects. The chosen area is in the northwest part of Romania, in Cluj-Napoca, where a former brick factory was closed, leaving behind unaesthetic and unused land. In this paper, it is suggested that a better understanding of the way in which UAV—Unmanned Aerial Vehicle—aerial photogrammetry can contribute to providing information for the design and development of this area. In addition, this study confirms the advantages of effective and practical use of the obtained geospatial information for the design of a residential complex in the studied area, a complex proposed as a sustainable alternative to the former industrial area. Observation and analysis of the differences between the two topo-geodetic works were carried out with the help of UAV technology, such as GNSS—Global Navigation Satellite System and TS—Total Station technology, respectively, to create a topographic plan, level curves, and 3D models made of the building in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanda Marioara Naș & Mircea Vasile Bondrea & Virgil Mihai Rădulescu & Raluca Gâlgău & Ioel Samuel Vereș & Raluca Bondrea & Adrian Traian Rădulescu, 2023. "The Use of UAVs for Land Use Planning of Brownfield Regeneration Projects-Case Study: Former Brick Factory, Cluj Napoca, Romania," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:315-:d:1044707
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/2/315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kiel, Katherine A. & Williams, Michael, 2007. "The impact of Superfund sites on local property values: Are all sites the same?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 170-192, January.
    2. Eser Yagci & Fernando Nunes da Silva, 2021. "The Future of Post-Industrial Landscapes in East Lisbon: The Braço de Prata Neighbourhood," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Rafał Blazy & Rita Łabuz, 2022. "Spatial Distribution and Land Development Parameters of Shopping Centers Based on GIS Analysis: A Case Study on Kraków, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Bohuslava Gregorová & Pavel Hronček & Dana Tometzová & Mário Molokáč & Vladimír Čech, 2020. "Transforming Brownfields as Tourism Destinations and Their Sustainability on the Example of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Dimitris Goussios & Ioannis Faraslis, 2022. "Integrated Remote Sensing and 3D GIS Methodology to Strengthen Public Participation and Identify Cultural Resources," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
    6. McCluskey, Jill J. & Rausser, Gordon C., 2003. "Hazardous waste sites and housing appreciation rates," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 166-176, March.
    7. Thomas O. Jackson, 2002. "Environmental Contamination and Industrial Real Estate Prices," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 23(1/2), pages 179-200.
    8. Hrvoje Sertić & Rinaldo Paar & Hrvoje Tomić & Fabijan Ravlić, 2022. "Influence of Flight Height and Image Sensor on the Quality of the UAS Orthophotos for Cadastral Survey Purposes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Kevin Haninger & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2017. "The Value of Brownfield Remediation," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 4(1), pages 197-241.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Trouw & Stephan Weiler & Jesse Silverstein, 2020. "Brownfield Development: Uncertainty, Asymmetric Information, and Risk Premia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Doron Lavee & Tomer Ash & Gilat Baniad, 2012. "Cost‐benefit analysis of soil remediation in Israeli industrial zones," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 36(4), pages 285-299, November.
    3. Mei, Yingdan & Qiu, Jixiang & Wu, Jialu & Meng, Lina, 2021. "Do residents care about urban dumps? Evidence from individual housing transaction data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Steve Gibbons & Stephan Heblich & Esther Lho & Christopher Timmins, 2016. "Fear of Fracking? The Impact of the Shale Gas Exploration on House Prices in Britain," SERC Discussion Papers 0207, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    5. Cutter, W. Bowman & Franco, Sofia F., 2012. "Do parking requirements significantly increase the area dedicated to parking? A test of the effect of parking requirements values in Los Angeles County," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 901-925.
    6. Kahn, Matthew E. & Walsh, Randall, 2015. "Cities and the Environment," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 405-465, Elsevier.
    7. Modica, Marco, 2017. "Does the construction of biogas plants affect local property values?," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 169-172.
    8. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin & Ranson, Matthew & Walsh, Patrick J., 2018. "Contamination and incomplete information: Bounding implicit prices using high-profile leaks," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 259-282.
    9. David Wolf & Sathya Gopalakrishnan & H. Allen Klaiber, 2022. "Staying afloat: The effect of algae contamination on Lake Erie housing prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(5), pages 1701-1723, October.
    10. Recai Aydin & Barton A. Smith, 2008. "Evidence of the Dual Nature of Property Value Recovery Following Environmental Remediation," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 777-812, December.
    11. John Braden & Xia Feng & DooHwan Won, 2011. "Waste Sites and Property Values: A Meta-Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 175-201, October.
    12. Karen A. Sullivan, 2017. "Brownfields Remediation: Impact on Local Residential Property Tax Revenue," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Ralph Mastromonaco, 2014. "Hazardous Waste Hits Hollywood: Superfund and Housing Prices in Los Angeles," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(2), pages 207-230, October.
    14. Walsh, Patrick & Mui, Preston, 2017. "Contaminated sites and information in hedonic models: An analysis of a NJ property disclosure law," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-14.
    15. Lucija Muehlenbachs & Elisheba Spiller & Christopher Timmins, 2015. "The Housing Market Impacts of Shale Gas Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(12), pages 3633-3659, December.
    16. Hausman, Catherine & Stolper, Samuel, 2021. "Inequality, information failures, and air pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    17. Velma Zahirovic-Herbert & Karen M Gibler, 2022. "The effect of film production studios on housing prices in Atlanta, the Hollywood of the South," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(4), pages 771-788, March.
    18. Dimitris Goussios & Ioannis Faraslis, 2023. "The Driving Role of 3D Geovisualization in the Reanimation of Local Collective Memory and Historical Sources for the Reconstitution of Rural Landscapes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Guignet, Dennis & Jenkins, Robin R. & Belke, James & Mason, Henry, 2023. "The property value impacts of industrial chemical accidents," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    20. Can Zou & Jun Tai & Li Chen & Yue Che, 2020. "An Environmental Justice Assessment of the Waste Treatment Facilities in Shanghai: Incorporating Counterfactual Decomposition into the Hedonic Price Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:2:p:315-:d:1044707. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.