IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v11y2018i4p85-d187105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Upstream Petroleum Fiscal Regimes in Myanmar

Author

Listed:
  • Wint Thiri Swe

    (Oil and Gas Planning Department, Ministry of Electricity and Energy, Building number 6, Nay Pyi Taw 15011, Myanmar)

  • Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi

    (Economics and Marketing Academic Group, College of Business, Law and Governance, James Cook University, P. O. Box 6811, Cairns Qld 4870, Australia)

Abstract

This study aims to assess Myanmar’s upstream petroleum fiscal regimes by applying comprehensive indicators to rank the level of attractiveness of Myanmar. The indicators include government take (GT), front loading index (FLI), and composite score (CS). The decision maker’s attitude for GT and FLI were considered in CS linear weighting method in ranking the fiscal terms attractiveness. The results showed that Myanmar’s upstream petroleum fiscal regime has low attraction compared to its competing countries from the investor’s point of view, both in terms of the risk to the investor in the earlier part of the project and in terms of evaluation with or without the time value of money. Also, royalty and cost recovery were identified to have an impact on the attractiveness rank of petroleum fiscal regime in Myanmar. Therefore, Myanmar should consider improving its fiscal regimes that are not neutral—particularly, royalty, tax, profit split, and cost recovery—for a favorable investment climate.

Suggested Citation

  • Wint Thiri Swe & Nnaemeka Vincent Emodi, 2018. "Assessment of Upstream Petroleum Fiscal Regimes in Myanmar," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:85-:d:187105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/11/4/85/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/11/4/85/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghebremusse Sara, 2015. "Conceptualizing the Developmental State in Resource-Rich Sub-Saharan Africa," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 467-502, December.
    2. Carole Nakhle, 2007. "Do High Oil Prices Justify an Increase in Taxation in a Mature Oil Province? The Case of the UK Continental Shelf," Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics Discussion Papers (SEEDS) 116, Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    3. Kaiser, Mark J., 2007. "Fiscal system analysis—concessionary systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2135-2147.
    4. Chris Rowland & Danny Hann, 1987. "The Economics of Oil Taxation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Economics of North Sea Oil Taxation, chapter 3, pages 45-94, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Thandar, Khine, 2008. "Foreign Direct Investment Relations between Myanmar and ASEAN," IDE Discussion Papers 149, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    6. Lyudmyla Hvozdyk & Valerie Mercer-Blackman, 2010. "What Determines Investment in the Oil Sector?: A New Era for National and International Oil Companies," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 9393, Inter-American Development Bank.
    7. Kemp, Alexander G. & Stephen, Linda, 2011. "The Short and Long Term Prospects for Activity in the UK Continental Shelf: the 2011 Perspective," SIRE Discussion Papers 654, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    8. Osmundsen, Petter & Løvås, Kjell, 2009. "Petroleum Taxation: Experience and Issues," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2009/8, University of Stavanger.
    9. Banfi, Silvia & Filippini, Massimo & Mueller, Adrian, 2005. "An estimation of the Swiss hydropower rent," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 927-937, May.
    10. Nakhle, Carole, 2007. "Do high oil prices justify an increase in taxation in a mature oil province? The case of the UK continental shelf," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4305-4318, August.
    11. repec:idb:brikps:publication-detail,7101.html?id=9401 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Chris Rowland & Danny Hann, 1987. "The Economics of North Sea Oil Taxation," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-08717-4.
    13. Hvozdyk, Lyudmyla & Mercer-Blackman, Valerie, 2010. "What Determines Investment in the Oil Sector?: A New Era for National and International Oil Companies," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 2659, Inter-American Development Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emmanuel E. Okoro & Lawrence U. Okoye & Ikechukwu S. Okafor & Tamunotonjo Obomanu & Ngozi Adeleye, 2021. "Impact of Production Sharing Contract Price Sliding Royalty: The case of Nigeria s Deepwater Operation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 261-268.
    2. Ibrahim S. Mohamed & Hamid M. Khttab & Said K. Elsayed & Mohsen G. El-Noby & Shady G. Elrammah, 2022. "A New Progressive and Efficient Royalty Model for Upstream Petroleum Industry," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 287-297, May.
    3. Saad Balhasan & Mohammed Alnahhal & Brian Towler & Bashir Salah & Mohammed Ruzayqat & Mosab I. Tabash, 2022. "Robust Exploration and Production Sharing Agreements Using the Taguchi Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Menegaki, Angeliki N. & Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P., 2015. "Rich enough to go renewable, but too early to leave fossil energy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1465-1477.
    2. Carole Nakhle, 2007. "Can the North Sea Still Save Europe?," Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics Discussion Papers (SEEDS) 119, Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    3. Abdul Manaf, Nor Aziah & Mas'ud, Abdulsalam & Ishak, Zuaini & Saad, Natrah & Russell, Alex, 2016. "Towards establishing a scale for assessing the attractiveness of petroleum fiscal regimes – Evidence from Malaysia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 253-261.
    4. Carole Nakhle, 2008. "Can the North Sea still save Europe?," OPEC Energy Review, Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, vol. 32(2), pages 123-138, June.
    5. Tran, Martino, 2012. "Technology-behavioural modelling of energy innovation diffusion in the UK," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 1-11.
    6. Nakhle, Carole, 2007. "Do high oil prices justify an increase in taxation in a mature oil province? The case of the UK continental shelf," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4305-4318, August.
    7. Beer, Sebastian & Loeprick, Jan, 2017. "Taxing income in the oil and gas sector — Challenges of international and domestic profit shifting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 186-198.
    8. Dinwoodie, John & Tuck, Sarah & Rigot-Müller, Patrick, 2013. "Maritime oil freight flows to 2050: Delphi perceptions of maritime specialists," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 553-561.
    9. Carole Nakhle, 2007. "Do High Oil Prices Justify an Increase in Taxation in a Mature Oil Province? The Case of the UK Continental Shelf," Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics Discussion Papers (SEEDS) 116, Surrey Energy Economics Centre (SEEC), School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    10. Acheampong, Theophilus & Phimister, Euan & Kemp, Alexander, 2021. "What difference has the Cullen Report made? Empirical analysis of offshore safety regulations in the United Kingdom's oil and gas industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Banfi, Silvia & Filippini, Massimo, 2010. "Resource rent taxation and benchmarking--A new perspective for the Swiss hydropower sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2302-2308, May.
    12. Gregor Schwerhoff & Ottmar Edenhofer & Marc Fleurbaey, 2020. "Taxation Of Economic Rents," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 398-423, April.
    13. Werner Hediger, 2018. "The Corporate Social Responsibility of Hydropower Companies in Alpine Regions—Theory and Policy Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Mercer-Blackman, Valerie, 2015. "Transitioning the Tax System to Take Advantage of the Natural Gas-Rich Economy in Trinidad and Tobago," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 7368, Inter-American Development Bank.
    15. Ei Ei Phyoe, 2015. "The Relationship between Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth of Selected ASEAN Countries," International Journal of Business and Administrative Studies, Professor Dr. Bahaudin G. Mujtaba, vol. 1(4), pages 132-146.
    16. Massarutto, Antonio & Pontoni, Federico, 2015. "Rent seizing and environmental concerns: A parametric valuation of the Italian hydropower sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 31-40.
    17. Pierre-Olivier Pineau, 2008. "Electricity Subsidies in Low-Cost Jurisdictions: The Case of British Columbia," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 34(3), pages 379-394, September.
    18. Chaves, J. P. & Cossent, R. & Gómez San Román, T. & Linares, P. & Rivier, M., 2023. "An assessment of the European electricity market reform options and a pragmatic proposal," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2325, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    19. Emmanuel E. Okoro & Lawrence U. Okoye & Ikechukwu S. Okafor & Tamunotonjo Obomanu & Ngozi Adeleye, 2021. "Impact of Production Sharing Contract Price Sliding Royalty: The case of Nigeria s Deepwater Operation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 261-268.
    20. Abdo, Hafez, 2014. "Investigating the effectiveness of different forms of mineral resources governance in meeting the objectives of the UK petroleum fiscal regime," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 48-56.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:85-:d:187105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.