IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7206-d422798.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Predictors of Driving Cessation among Older Drivers in Korea

Author

Listed:
  • SeolHwa Moon

    (College of Nursing, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Sungdong-gu, Seoul 04763, Korea)

  • Kyongok Park

    (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, 150 Namwon-ro, Heungeop-myeon, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do 26403, Korea)

Abstract

Background: As the elderly population and the number of older drivers grow, public safety concerns about traffic accidents involving older drivers are increasing. Approaches to reduce traffic accidents involving older drivers without limiting their mobility are needed. This study aimed to investigate the driving cessation (DC) rate among older Korean adults and predictors of DC based on the comprehensive mobility framework. Method: In this cross-sectional study, data from 2970 to 10,062 older adults over 65 years old from the 2017 National Survey of Elderly People were analyzed in April 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the predictors of DC. Results: Residential area, an environmental factor, was a strong predictor of DC (Odds Ratio (OR) 2.21, 95% Confidential Interval (CI) 1.86–2.62). Older drivers living in an area with a metro system were 2.21 more likely to stop driving than those living in an area without a metro system. Other demographic, financial, psychosocial, physical, and cognitive variables also predicted DC. Conclusion: Environmental factors were strong predictors of older adults’ DC. Therefore, political and environmental support, such as the provision of accessible public transportation, is essential to increase the DC rate among older adults to increase public safety without decreasing their mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • SeolHwa Moon & Kyongok Park, 2020. "The Predictors of Driving Cessation among Older Drivers in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7206-:d:422798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7206/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7206/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hess, Daniel Baldwin & Norton, J. Travis & Park, JiYoung & Street, Debra A., 2016. "Driving decisions of older adults receiving meal delivery: The influence of individual characteristics, the built environment, and neighborhood familiarity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 73-85.
    2. Carlo Luiu & Miles Tight & Michael Burrow, 2018. "Factors Preventing the Use of Alternative Transport Modes to the Car in Later Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Liu, Yunxia & Hong, Zaisheng & Liu, Yong, 2016. "Do driving restriction policies effectively motivate commuters to use public transportation?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 253-261.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Satonori Nasu & Yu Ishibashi & Junichi Ikuta & Shingo Yamane & Ryuji Kobayashi, 2022. "Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Assessment of Readiness for Mobility Transition (ARMT-J) for Japanese Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Bart Geurden & Jeroen Cant & Joris Beckers, 2022. "Food Accessibility in the Suburbs of the Metropolitan City of Antwerp (Belgium): A Factor of Concern in Local Public Health and Active and Healthy Aging," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kent, Jennifer L. & Mulley, Corinne & Stevens, Nick, 2020. "Challenging policies that prohibit public transport use: Travelling with pets as a case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 86-94.
    2. Zhang, Linling & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong, 2019. "Do car restriction policies effectively promote the development of public transport?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 100-110.
    3. Anne-Sophie Travert & Kristi Sidney Annerstedt & Meena Daivadanam, 2019. "Built Environment and Health Behaviors: Deconstructing the Black Box of Interactions—A Review of Reviews," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Quaglione, Davide & Cassetta, Ernesto & Crociata, Alessandro & Marra, Alessandro & Sarra, Alessandro, 2019. "An assessment of the role of cultural capital on sustainable mobility behaviours: Conceptual framework and empirical evidence," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 24-34.
    5. Ward, Chandra & Walsh, Darrell, 2023. "“I just don't go nowhere:” How transportation disadvantage reinforces social exclusion," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Das, Sanhita & Boruah, Alice & Banerjee, Arunabha & Raoniar, Rahul & Nama, Suresh & Maurya, Akhilesh Kumar, 2021. "Impact of COVID-19: A radical modal shift from public to private transport mode," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-11.
    7. Urbanek, Anna & Acedański, Jan & Krawczyk, Grzegorz, 2023. "Depopulation or ageing? Decomposing the aggregate effects of projected demographic changes on urban transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Joshi, Saakshi & Bailey, Ajay & Datta, Anindita, 2021. "On the move? Exploring constraints to accessing urban mobility infrastructures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 61-74.
    9. Bagdatli, Muhammed Emin Cihangir & Ipek, Fatima, 2022. "Transport mode preferences of university students in post-COVID-19 pandemic," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 20-32.
    10. Zhilong Chen & Lichang Su & Cheng Zhang, 2016. "Research on the Synergy Degree of Aboveground and Underground Space along Urban Rail Transit from the Perspective of Urban Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. He, Xiaoping & Jiang, Shuo, 2021. "Effects of vehicle purchase restrictions on urban air quality: Empirical study on cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PB).
    12. Shirgaokar, Manish & Dobbs, Bonnie & Anderson, Leah & Hussey, Emily, 2020. "Do rural older adults take fewer trips than their urban counterparts for lack of a ride?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Thomas Péran & Thomas Porcher, 2019. "Worker mobility and the purchase of low CO2 emission vehicles in France: a datamining approach," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 16(2), pages 171-205, December.
    14. Liu, Zhiyong & Li, Ruimin & Wang, Xiaokun (Cara) & Shang, Pan, 2020. "Noncompliance behavior against vehicle restriction policy: A case study of Langfang, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1020-1033.
    15. Jain, Nikunj Kumar & Kaushik, Kapil & Choudhary, Piyush, 2021. "Sustainable perspectives on transportation: Public perception towards odd-even restrictive driving policy in Delhi, India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 99-108.
    16. Ma, Jingwen & Zhao, Shengchuan & Li, Wu & Liu, Meng & Luo, Huanhuan, 2022. "Heterogeneity in seniors' unmet walking needs: A latent class analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. Luo, Mingjie & Ma, Zhuanglin & Zhao, Wenjing & Enoch, Marcus & I-Jy Chien, Steven, 2022. "An ex-post evaluation of the public acceptance of a license plate-based restriction policy: A case study of Xi’an, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 259-282.
    18. Katrin Lättman & Lars E. Olsson & Margareta Friman & Satoshi Fujii, 2019. "Perceived Accessibility, Satisfaction with Daily Travel, and Life Satisfaction among the Elderly," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    19. Raphaël Homayoun Boroumand & Stéphane Goutte & Thomas Péran & Thomas Porcher, 2019. "Worker mobility and the purchase of low CO2 emission vehicles in France: a datamining approach," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 16(2), pages 171-205, December.
    20. Schasché, Stephanie E. & Sposato, Robert G. & Hampl, Nina, 2022. "The dilemma of demand-responsive transport services in rural areas: Conflicting expectations and weak user acceptance," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 43-54.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7206-:d:422798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.