IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i12p4480-d842911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logistics and Costs of Agricultural Residues for Cellulosic Ethanol Production

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Armando Becerra-Pérez

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacan 80010, Mexico
    Biotechnology and Society Research Group, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Luis Rincón

    (Centro Internacional de Investigación y Desarrollo—CIID, Montería 230001, Colombia)

  • John A. Posada-Duque

    (Department of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

There is global pressure to make advanced biofuels profitable. For cellulosic ethanol, three aspects remain as bottlenecks: collection of feedstocks, pretreatment methods, and enzyme production. In this paper, the first aspect is investigated, by addressing the main challenges for the logistics of agricultural residues. A logistic supply chain of corn stover collection and utilization for cellulosic ethanol production in Mexico is proposed, and a cost structure is designed for its estimation. By applying a value chain methodology, seven links and a set of three minimum selling prices (MSPs) of agricultural residues were determined. Furthermore, the harvest index (HI), crop residue index (CRI), nutrient substitution by extraction of agricultural residues, and harvest costs of corn stover were also calculated for a case study. The main results were a HI of 0.45, a CRI of 1.21, and nutrient substitution potential of 7 kg N, 2.2 kg P 2 O 5 , and 12.2 kg K 2 O per ton of corn stover. The set of the three estimated MSPs for corn stover was: $28.49 USD/ton (for delivery to the biorefinery’s gate), $31.15 USD/ton (for delivery and storage), and $48.14 USD/ton (for delivery, storage, and nutrient replenishment). Given the impact of the feedstock cost on the profitability of cellulosic ethanol, knowing details of the logistical information and its costs is critical to advancing the field of biofuels in Mexico. We also found that only 20% of farmers currently sell their residues; however, 65% of farmers would be willing to do so, a significant percentage for cellulosic ethanol production.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Armando Becerra-Pérez & Luis Rincón & John A. Posada-Duque, 2022. "Logistics and Costs of Agricultural Residues for Cellulosic Ethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4480-:d:842911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4480/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4480/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brechbill, Sarah C. & Tyner, Wallace E. & Ileleji, Klein E., 2008. "The economics of biomass collection and transportation and its supply to Indiana cellulosic and electric utility facilities," Risk, Infrastructure and Industry Evolution Conference, June 24-25, 2008, Berkeley, California 48732, Farm Foundation.
    2. Petrolia, Daniel R., 2006. "The Economics of Harvesting and Transporting Hardwood Forest Residue for Conversion to Fuel Ethanol: A Case Study for Minnesota," Staff Papers 14020, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Weiser, Christian & Zeller, Vanessa & Reinicke, Frank & Wagner, Bernhard & Majer, Stefan & Vetter, Armin & Thraen, Daniela, 2014. "Integrated assessment of sustainable cereal straw potential and different straw-based energy applications in Germany," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 749-762.
    4. Petrolia, Daniel R., 2006. "The Economics of Harvesting and Transporting Corn Stover for Conversion to Fuel Ethanol: A Case Study for Minnesota," Staff Papers 14213, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    5. Sarah C. Brechbill & Wallace E. Tyner, 2008. "The Economics Of Biomass Collection,Transportation, And Supply To Indiana Cellulosic And Electric Utility Facilities," Working Papers 08-03, Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Zhang, Caixia & Xie, Gaodi & Li, Shimei & Ge, Liqiang & He, Tingting, 2010. "The productive potentials of sweet sorghum ethanol in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2360-2368, July.
    7. Mikael Lantz & Thomas Prade & Serina Ahlgren & Lovisa Björnsson, 2018. "Biogas and Ethanol from Wheat Grain or Straw: Is There a Trade-Off between Climate Impact, Avoidance of iLUC and Production Cost?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, October.
    8. Douglas L. Karlen & John L. Kovar & Stuart J. Birrell, 2015. "Corn Stover Nutrient Removal Estimates for Central Iowa, USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-14, July.
    9. English, Alicia & Tyner, Wallace E. & Sesmero, Juan P. & Owens, Phillip & Muth, David, 2012. "Environmental Impacts of Stover Removal in the Corn Belt," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124873, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Ekman, Anna & Wallberg, Ola & Joelsson, Elisabeth & Börjesson, Pål, 2013. "Possibilities for sustainable biorefineries based on agricultural residues – A case study of potential straw-based ethanol production in Sweden," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 299-308.
    11. Padilla, Ramón & Oddone, Nahuel, 2016. "Manual para el fortalecimiento de cadenas de valor," Sede Subregional de la CEPAL en México (Estudios e Investigaciones) 40662, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    12. Piotr Gradziuk & Barbara Gradziuk & Anna Trocewicz & Błażej Jendrzejewski, 2020. "Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Adrián Bautista-Herrera & Francisco Ortiz-Arango & José Álvarez-García, 2021. "Profitability Using Second-Generation Bioethanol in Gasoline Produced in Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dariusz Kusz & Iwona Bąk & Beata Szczecińska & Ludwik Wicki & Bożena Kusz, 2022. "Determinants of Return-on-Equity (ROE) of Biogas Plants Operating in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Gradziuk & Barbara Gradziuk & Anna Trocewicz & Błażej Jendrzejewski, 2020. "Potential of Straw for Energy Purposes in Poland—Forecasts Based on Trend and Causal Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Renata Marks-Bielska & Stanisław Bielski & Anastasija Novikova & Kęstutis Romaneckas, 2019. "Straw Stocks as a Source of Renewable Energy. A Case Study of a District in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Zou, Tianyu & Pederson, Glenn D., 2008. "Using Real Options to Evaluate Investments in Ethanol Facilities," Staff Papers 37872, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    4. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Anna Zielińska-Chmielewska & Kęstutis Romaneckas & Egidijus Šarauskis, 2021. "Importance of Agriculture in Creating Energy Security—A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Venturini, Giada & Pizarro-Alonso, Amalia & Münster, Marie, 2019. "How to maximise the value of residual biomass resources: The case of straw in Denmark," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 369-388.
    6. Daraei, Mahsa & Avelin, Anders & Dotzauer, Erik & Thorin, Eva, 2019. "Evaluation of biofuel production integrated with existing CHP plants and the impacts on production planning of the system – A case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Rahdar, Mohammad & Wang, Lizhi & Hu, Guiping, 2014. "Potential competition for biomass between biopower and biofuel under RPS and RFS2," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 10-20.
    8. Lazarus, William F., 2008. "Energy Crop Production Costs and Breakeven Prices Under Minnesota Conditions," Staff Papers 45655, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    9. Eidman, Vernon R. & Petrolia, Daniel R. & Huang, Huajiang & Ramaswamy, Shri, 2009. "The Economic Feasibility of Producing Ethanol from Corn Stover and Hardwood in Minnesota," Staff Papers 47055, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    10. Zhang, Jun & Osmani, Atif & Awudu, Iddrisu & Gonela, Vinay, 2013. "An integrated optimization model for switchgrass-based bioethanol supply chain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1205-1217.
    11. English, Alicia & Tyner, Wallace E. & Sesmero, Juan P. & Owens, Phillip & Muth, David, 2012. "Environmental Impacts of Stover Removal in the Corn Belt," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124873, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Rauh, Stefan & Berenz, Stefan & Heissenhuber, Alois, 2007. "ABSCHATZUNG DES UNTERNEHMERISCHEN RISIKOS BEIM BETRIEB EINER BIOGASANLAGE MIT HILFE DER MONTECARLO-METHODE (German)," 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007 7588, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    13. Rauh, S. & Berenz, S. & Heißenhuber, A., 2008. "Abschätzung des unternehmerischen Risikos beim Betrieb einer Biogasanlage mit Hilfe der Monte-Carlo-Methode," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 43, March.
    14. Rosburg, Alicia & Miranowski, John & Jacobs, Keri, 2016. "Modeling biomass procurement tradeoffs within a cellulosic biofuel cost model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 77-83.
    15. Epplin, Francis M., 2008. "Millions of acres for dedicated energy crops: farms, ranches, or plantations?," Integration of Agricultural and Energy Systems Conference, February 12-13, 2008, Atlanta, Georgia 48711, Farm Foundation.
    16. Epplin, Francis M. & Haque, Mohua, 2011. "Policies to Facilitate Conversion of Millions of Acres to the Production of Biofuel Feedstock," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 385-398, August.
    17. Alexander, Corinne & Ivanic, Rasto & Rosch, Stephanie & Tyner, Wallace & Wu, Steven Y. & Yoder, Joshua R., 2012. "Contract theory and implications for perennial energy crop contracting," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 970-979.
    18. Krishnan, Venkat & McCalley, James D., 2016. "The role of bio-renewables in national energy and transportation systems portfolio planning for low carbon economy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 207-223.
    19. Mooney, Daniel F. & Roberts, Roland K. & English, Burton C. & Tyler, Donald D. & Larson, James A., 2008. "Switchgrass Production in Marginal Environments: A Comparative Economic Analysis across Four West Tennessee Landscapes," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6403, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Scott M. Swinton & Felix Dulys & Sarah S.H. Klammer, 2021. "Why Biomass Residue Is Not as Plentiful as It Looks: Case Study on Economic Supply of Logging Residues," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(3), pages 1003-1025, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:4480-:d:842911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.