IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i13p4051-d588713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Welcoming New Entrants into European Electricity Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Schittekatte

    (Florence School of Regulation, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Via Boccaccio 121, 50133 Florence, Italy
    Vlerick Energy Centre, Vlerick Business School, Bolwerklaan 21, 1210 Brussels, Belgium)

  • Valerie Reif

    (Florence School of Regulation, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Via Boccaccio 121, 50133 Florence, Italy)

  • Leonardo Meeus

    (Florence School of Regulation, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Via Boccaccio 121, 50133 Florence, Italy
    Vlerick Energy Centre, Vlerick Business School, Bolwerklaan 21, 1210 Brussels, Belgium)

Abstract

In this review paper, we select four important waves of new entrants that knocked on the door of European electricity markets to illustrate how market rules need to be continuously adapted to allow new entrants to come in and push innovation forward. The new entrants that we selected are utilities venturing into neighbouring markets after establishing a strong position in their home market, utility-scale renewables project developers, asset-light software companies aggregating smaller consumers and producers, and different types of communities. We show that well-intentioned rules designed for certain types of market participants can (unintentionally) become obstacles for new entrants. We conclude that the evolution of market rules illustrates the importance of dynamic regulation. At the start of the liberalisation process the view was that we would deregulate or re-regulate the sector after which the role of regulators could be reduced. However, their role has only increased. New players tend to improve the sustainability of the electricity sector in environmental, social, or economic terms but might also present new risks that require intervention by regulators.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Schittekatte & Valerie Reif & Leonardo Meeus, 2021. "Welcoming New Entrants into European Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:4051-:d:588713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/4051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/13/4051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ibrahim Abada, Andreas Ehrenmann, and Xavier Lambin, 2020. "On the Viability of Energy Communities," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    2. Klessmann, Corinna & Nabe, Christian & Burges, Karsten, 2008. "Pros and cons of exposing renewables to electricity market risks--A comparison of the market integration approaches in Germany, Spain, and the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3646-3661, October.
    3. Abada, I. & Ehrenmann, A. & Lambin, X., 2017. "On the viability of energy communities," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1740, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    4. Küfeoğlu, S. & Liu, G. & Anaya, K. & Pollitt, M., 2019. "Digitalisation and New Business Models in Energy Sector," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1956, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    5. Tooraj Jamasb and Michael Pollitt, 2005. "Electricity Market Reform in the European Union: Review of Progress toward Liberalization & Integration," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 11-42.
    6. Newbery, David & Pollitt, Michael G. & Ritz, Robert A. & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2018. "Market design for a high-renewables European electricity system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 695-707.
    7. He, Xian & Keyaerts, Nico & Azevedo, Isabel & Meeus, Leonardo & Hancher, Leigh & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2013. "How to engage consumers in demand response: A contract perspective," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 108-122.
    8. Xu Chen and Andrew N. Kleit, 2016. "Money for Nothing? Why FERC Order 745 Should have Died," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    9. Karsten Neuhoff & Carlos Batlle & Gert Brunekreeft & Christos Vasilakos Konstantinidis & Christian Nabe & Giorgia Oggioni & Pablo Rodilla & Sebastian Schwenen & Tomasz Siewierski & Goran Strbac, 2015. "Flexible Short-Term Power Trading: Gathering Experience in EU Countries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1494, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    10. Burger, Scott P. & Luke, Max, 2017. "Business models for distributed energy resources: A review and empirical analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 230-248.
    11. Pepermans, G. & Driesen, J. & Haeseldonckx, D. & Belmans, R. & D'haeseleer, W., 2005. "Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 787-798, April.
    12. Askeland, Magnus & Backe, Stian & Bjarghov, Sigurd & Korpås, Magnus, 2021. "Helping end-users help each other: Coordinating development and operation of distributed resources through local power markets and grid tariffs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Barbero, Mattia & Corchero, Cristina & Canals Casals, Lluc & Igualada, Lucia & Heredia, F.-Javier, 2020. "Critical evaluation of European balancing markets to enable the participation of Demand Aggregators," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    14. Michael G. Pollitt and Karim L. Anaya, 2020. "Competition in Markets for Ancillary Services? The Implications of Rising Distributed Generation," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I).
    15. Koliou, Elta & Eid, Cherrelle & Chaves-Ávila, José Pablo & Hakvoort, Rudi A., 2014. "Demand response in liberalized electricity markets: Analysis of aggregated load participation in the German balancing mechanism," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 245-254.
    16. Ziras, Charalampos & Heinrich, Carsten & Bindner, Henrik W., 2021. "Why baselines are not suited for local flexibility markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    17. Paul L. Joskow, 2008. "Lessons Learned from Electricity Market Liberalization," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Special I), pages 9-42.
    18. Pollitt, Michael G., 2012. "The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 128-137.
    19. Vandezande, Leen & Meeus, Leonardo & Belmans, Ronnie & Saguan, Marcelo & Glachant, Jean-Michel, 2010. "Well-functioning balancing markets: A prerequisite for wind power integration," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 3146-3154, July.
    20. Hung-po Chao, 2011. "Demand response in wholesale electricity markets: the choice of customer baseline," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 68-88, February.
    21. Leonardo Meeus, 2020. "The Evolution of Electricity Markets in Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19187.
    22. Bushnell, James & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Wolak, Frank A., 2009. "When It Comes to Demand Response, Is FERC Its Own Worst Enemy?," The Electricity Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 9-18, October.
    23. Schittekatte, Tim & Meeus, Leonardo, 2020. "Flexibility markets: Q&A with project pioneers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    24. Märkle-Huß, Joscha & Feuerriegel, Stefan & Neumann, Dirk, 2018. "Contract durations in the electricity market: Causal impact of 15min trading on the EPEX SPOT market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 367-378.
    25. F.G. Reis, Inês & Gonçalves, Ivo & A.R. Lopes, Marta & Henggeler Antunes, Carlos, 2021. "Business models for energy communities: A review of key issues and trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schwidtal, Jan Marc & Agostini, Marco & Coppo, Massimiliano & Bignucolo, Fabio & Lorenzoni, Arturo, 2023. "Optimized operation of distributed energy resources: The opportunities of value stacking for Power-to-Gas aggregated with PV," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    2. Olivier Rebenaque & Carlo Schmitt & Klemens Schumann, 2022. "Trading in local markets: A review of concepts and challenges," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2022(2), pages 25-47.
    3. Lynne L. Kiesling & Leonardo Meeus & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "Special Issue “Innovation, Policy, and Regulation in Electricity Markets”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-4, September.
    4. Đorđe Lazović & Željko Đurišić, 2023. "Advanced Flexibility Support through DSO-Coordinated Participation of DER Aggregators in the Balancing Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-26, April.
    5. George E. Halkos & Apostolos S. Tsirivis, 2023. "Electricity Prices in the European Union Region: The Role of Renewable Energy Sources, Key Economic Factors and Market Liberalization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Saray Martínez-Lastras & Laura Frías-Paredes & Diego Prieto-Herráez & Martín Gastón-Romeo & Diego González-Aguilera, 2023. "Analysis of the Suitability of the EOLO Wind-Predictor Model for the Spanish Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ottavia Valentini & Nikoleta Andreadou & Paolo Bertoldi & Alexandre Lucas & Iolanda Saviuc & Evangelos Kotsakis, 2022. "Demand Response Impact Evaluation: A Review of Methods for Estimating the Customer Baseline Load," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-36, July.
    2. Chen, Ting & Vandendriessche, Frederik, 2023. "Evolution of the EU legal framework for promoting RES-E: A market compatible paradigm shift?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Fatras, Nicolas & Ma, Zheng & Duan, Hongbo & Jørgensen, Bo Nørregaard, 2022. "A systematic review of electricity market liberalisation and its alignment with industrial consumer participation: A comparison between the Nordics and China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Michael G. Pollitt, 2019. "The European Single Market in Electricity: An Economic Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 55(1), pages 63-87, August.
    5. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    6. Annala, Salla & Ruggiero, Salvatore & Kangas, Hanna-Liisa & Honkapuro, Samuli & Ohrling, Tiina, 2022. "Impact of home market on business development and internationalization of demand response firms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    7. Brijs, Tom & De Jonghe, Cedric & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Belmans, Ronnie, 2017. "Interactions between the design of short-term electricity markets in the CWE region and power system flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 36-51.
    8. Lago, Jesus & Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Suryanarayana, Gowri & De Schutter, Bart, 2021. "A market framework for grid balancing support through imbalances trading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2015. "Caught between theory and practice: Government, market, and regulatory failure in electricity sector reforms," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 16-24.
    10. Tanrisever, Fehmi & Derinkuyu, Kursad & Jongen, Geert, 2015. "Organization and functioning of liberalized electricity markets: An overview of the Dutch market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1363-1374.
    11. Mircea (Mike) Bostan, 2021. "EU Electricity Policy (Im)balance: A Quantitative Analysis of Policy Priorities Since 1986," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 298-309.
    12. Aikaterini Forouli & Emmanouil A. Bakirtzis & Georgios Papazoglou & Konstantinos Oureilidis & Vasileios Gkountis & Luisa Candido & Eloi Delgado Ferrer & Pandelis Biskas, 2021. "Assessment of Demand Side Flexibility in European Electricity Markets: A Country Level Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Tooraj Jamasb & Rabindra Nepal & Govinda R. Timilsina, 2017. "A Quarter Century Effort Yet to Come of Age: A Survey of Electricity Sector Reform in Developing Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    14. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst & van den Broek, Machteld, 2018. "Identifying barriers to large-scale integration of variable renewable electricity into the electricity market: A literature review of market design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2181-2195.
    15. Rabindra, Nepal & Tooraj, Jamasb, 2013. "Caught Between Theory and Practice: Government, Market, and Regulatory Failure in Electricity Sector Reforms," SIRE Discussion Papers 2013-22, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    16. Hyland, Marie, 2016. "Restructuring European electricity markets – A panel data analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 33-42.
    17. Štefan Bojnec & Alan Križaj, 2021. "Electricity Markets during the Liberalization: The Case of a European Union Country," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Camadan, Ercument & Erten, Ibrahim Etem & Zhang, Alex Hongliang, 2023. "Market failure or politics? Understanding the motives behind regulatory actions to address surging electricity prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Erdogdu, Erkan, 2013. "Essays on Electricity Market Reforms: A Cross-Country Applied Approach," MPRA Paper 47139, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:13:p:4051-:d:588713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.