IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v63y2020ics0957178720300126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flexibility markets: Q&A with project pioneers

Author

Listed:
  • Schittekatte, Tim
  • Meeus, Leonardo

Abstract

Flexibility markets are a promising tool to make better use of existing distribution grids. We analyse four pioneering projects implementing flexibility markets: Piclo Flex, Enera, GOPACS, and NODES. Based on a literature review, we develop a six-question framework. We find that all of the considered flexibility markets are operated by a third party. All projects also engage with multiple DSOs to become the standardized platform provider. Differences among the projects are found in the extent to which the flexibility markets are integrated into other existing markets, the use of reservation payments, the use of standardized products, and the way TSO-DSO cooperation is done. The answers to these questions vary for the projects because of different visions, use cases, or project maturity. Our case study analysis of four pioneering projects enriches the taxonomy and shows that practice is moving faster than the conceptual debate around flexibility markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Schittekatte, Tim & Meeus, Leonardo, 2020. "Flexibility markets: Q&A with project pioneers," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:63:y:2020:i:c:s0957178720300126
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2020.101017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178720300126
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hirth, Lion & Schlecht, Ingmar, 2020. "Market-Based Redispatch in Zonal Electricity Markets: The Preconditions for and Consequence of Inc-Dec Gaming," EconStor Preprints 194292, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, revised 2020.
    2. Meeus, Leonardo, 2011. "Why (and how) to regulate power exchanges in the EU market integration context?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1470-1475, March.
    3. Hélène Le Cadre & Ilyès Mezghani & Anthony Papavasiliou, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2996, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Ramos, Ariana & De Jonghe, Cedric & Gómez, Virginia & Belmans, Ronnie, 2016. "Realizing the smart grid's potential: Defining local markets for flexibility," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 26-35.
    5. Dallinger, Bettina & Auer, Hans & Lettner, Georg, 2018. "Impact of harmonised common balancing capacity procurement in selected Central European electricity balancing markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 351-368.
    6. Neuhoff, Karsten & Richstein, Jörn, 2017. "TSO-DSO-PX Cooperation. Report on the key elements of debate from a workshop of the Future Power Market Platform," EconStor Research Reports 167313, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    8. Hirth, Lion & Glismann, Samuel, 2018. "Congestion Management: From Physics to Regulatory Instruments," EconStor Preprints 189641, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Scott P. Burger, Jesse D. Jenkins, Carlos Batlle, and Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga, 2019. "Restructuring Revisited Part 1: Competition in Electricity Distribution Systems," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    10. Pär Holmberg and Ewa Lazarczyk, 2015. "Comparison of congestion management techniques: Nodal, zonal and discriminatory pricing," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 2).
    11. Gerard, Helena & Rivero Puente, Enrique Israel & Six, Daan, 2018. "Coordination between transmission and distribution system operators in the electricity sector: A conceptual framework," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 40-48.
    12. Scott P. Burger, Jesse D. Jenkins, Carlos Batlle, and Ignacio J. Perez-Arriaga, 2019. "Restructuring Revisited Part 2: Coordination in Electricity Distribution Systems," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    13. Pollitt, Michael G., 2012. "Lessons from the history of independent system operators in the energy sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 32-48.
    14. Hadush, Samson Yemane & Meeus, Leonardo, 2018. "DSO-TSO cooperation issues and solutions for distribution grid congestion management," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 610-621.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebenaque, Olivier & Schmitt, Carlo & Schumann, Klemens & Dronne, Théo & Roques, Fabien, 2023. "Success of local flexibility market implementation: A review of current projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Attar, Mehdi & Repo, Sami & Mann, Pierre, 2022. "Congestion management market design- Approach for the Nordics and Central Europe," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    3. Gonzalez Venegas, Felipe & Petit, Marc & Perez, Yannick, 2021. "Active integration of electric vehicles into distribution grids: Barriers and frameworks for flexibility services," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Martin Palovic, 2022. "Coordination of power network operators as a game-theoretical problem," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0040, Bremen Energy Research.
    5. Hermann, Alexander & Jensen, Tue Vissing & Østergaard, Jacob & Kazempour, Jalal, 2022. "A complementarity model for electric power transmission-distribution coordination under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 313-329.
    6. Marius Buchmann, 2019. "How decentralization drives a change of the institutional framework on the distribution grid level in the electricity sector – the case of local congestion markets," Bremen Energy Working Papers 0031, Bremen Energy Research.
    7. Rafal Dzikowski, 2020. "DSO–TSO Coordination of Day-Ahead Operation Planning with the Use of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Heilmann, Erik & Klempp, Nikolai & Wetzel, Heike, 2020. "Design of regional flexibility markets for electricity: A product classification framework for and application to German pilot projects," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Karim L. Anaya & Monica Giulietti & Michael G. Pollitt, 2022. "Where next for the electricity distribution system operator? Evidence from a survey of European DSOs and National Regulatory Authorities," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 23(4), pages 245-269, December.
    10. Anibal Sanjab & H'el`ene Le Cadre & Yuting Mou, 2021. "TSO-DSOs Stable Cost Allocation for the Joint Procurement of Flexibility: A Cooperative Game Approach," Papers 2111.12830, arXiv.org.
    11. Theo Dronne & Fabien Roques & Marcelo Saguan, 2021. "Local Flexibility Markets for Distribution Network Congestion-Management in Center-Western Europe: Which Design for Which Needs?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Pedro H. Perico E Santos & Olivier Massol, 2022. "Electricity Distribution Systems in Europe : An Overview of Contemporary Regulatory Challenges," Working Papers hal-03897936, HAL.
    13. Shariat Torbaghan, Shahab & Madani, Mehdi & Sels, Peter & Virag, Ana & Le Cadre, Hélène & Kessels, Kris & Mou, Yuting, 2021. "Designing day-ahead multi-carrier markets for flexibility: Models and clearing algorithms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    14. Erik Heilmann & Nikolai Klempp & Heike Wetzel, 2020. "Market design of regional flexibility markets: A classification metric for flexibility products and its application to German prototypical flexibility markets," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202002, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    15. Lago, Jesus & Poplavskaya, Ksenia & Suryanarayana, Gowri & De Schutter, Bart, 2021. "A market framework for grid balancing support through imbalances trading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Nayeem Rahman & Rodrigo Rabetino & Arto Rajala & Jukka Partanen, 2021. "Ushering in a New Dawn: Demand-Side Local Flexibility Platform Governance and Design in the Finnish Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Osińska, Magdalena & Kyzym, Mykola & Khaustova, Victoriia & Ilyash, Olha & Salashenko, Tetiana, 2022. "Does the Ukrainian electricity market correspond to the european model?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Eicke, Anselm & Schittekatte, Tim, 2022. "Fighting the wrong battle? A critical assessment of arguments against nodal electricity prices in the European debate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    19. Neuhoff, Karsten & Richstein, Jörn, 2017. "TSO-DSO-PX Cooperation. Report on the key elements of debate from a workshop of the Future Power Market Platform," EconStor Research Reports 167313, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    20. Le Cadre, Hélène & Bedo, Jean-Sébastien, 2020. "Consensus reaching with heterogeneous user preferences, private input and privacy-preservation output," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:63:y:2020:i:c:s0957178720300126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.