IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i10p2453-d357619.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

IT2 Fuzzy-Based Multidimensional Evaluation of Coal Energy for Sustainable Economic Development

Author

Listed:
  • Ling Du

    (College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China)

  • Hasan Dinçer

    (School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, 34810 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • İrfan Ersin

    (School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, 34810 Istanbul, Turkey)

  • Serhat Yüksel

    (School of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, 34810 Istanbul, Turkey)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the impact of coal energy on the economic development of countries. For this purpose, similar studies in the literature have been examined and nine different criteria have been determined for three dimensions affecting the use of coal energy. In order to determine the most important factors, an analysis is performed with IT2 fuzzy DANP method. The most important contribution of this study to the literature is that a proposal can be made for the use of coal energy by considering both positive and negative opinions related to this energy. On the other hand, IT2 fuzzy DANP method has been taken into consideration in this study for the first-time regarding coal energy and it is believed that methodological originality has been achieved. It is identified that social factors have the most importance in the use of coal energy. In this context, environmental pollution, health problems and demographic factors resulting from the use of coal energy should be taken into consideration in the use of this energy. Thus, problems arising from the use of coal energy far outweigh the economic benefits of using this energy. Therefore, factors that may prevent air pollution, such as carbon capture technology, should be considered in the use of coal energy. In addition, the use of high-quality coal will contribute to the reduction of the problems caused with this energy. In addition, investing in renewable energy sources that do not have negative impacts on the environment is also important for the sustainability of future energy policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Ling Du & Hasan Dinçer & İrfan Ersin & Serhat Yüksel, 2020. "IT2 Fuzzy-Based Multidimensional Evaluation of Coal Energy for Sustainable Economic Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:2453-:d:357619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2453/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/10/2453/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cardoso, Andrea, 2015. "Behind the life cycle of coal: Socio-environmental liabilities of coal mining in Cesar, Colombia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 71-82.
    2. Bunn, Derek W. & Redondo-Martin, Jorge & Muñoz-Hernandez, José I. & Diaz-Cachinero, Pablo, 2019. "Analysis of coal conversion to biomass as a transitional technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 752-760.
    3. Garðarsdóttir, Stefanía Ó. & Göransson, Lisa & Normann, Fredrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2018. "Improving the flexibility of coal-fired power generators: Impact on the composition of a cost-optimal electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 277-289.
    4. Mashudu D. Mbedzi & Huibrecht M. Van der Poll & John A. Van der Poll, 2018. "An Information Framework for Facilitating Cost Saving of Environmental Impacts in the Coal Mining Industry in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Oladejo, Jumoke M. & Adegbite, Stephen & Pang, Cheng Heng & Liu, Hao & Parvez, Ashak M. & Wu, Tao, 2017. "A novel index for the study of synergistic effects during the co-processing of coal and biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 215-225.
    6. Shapiro, Matthew A. & Bolsen, Toby, 2019. "Korean perceptions of transboundary air pollution and domestic coal development: Two framing experiments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 333-342.
    7. Xie, Lunyu & Huang, Ying & Qin, Ping, 2018. "Spatial distribution of coal-fired power plants in China," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 495-515, August.
    8. Matyjaszek, Marta & Wodarski, Krzysztof & Krzemień, Alicja & Escanciano García-Miranda, Carmen & Suárez Sánchez, Ana, 2018. "Coking coal mining investment: Boosting European Union's raw materials initiative," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 88-97.
    9. Teng, Meixuan & Burke, Paul J. & Liao, Hua, 2019. "The demand for coal among China's rural households: Estimates of price and income elasticities," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 928-936.
    10. Bohlmann, H.R. & Horridge, J.M. & Inglesi-Lotz, R. & Roos, E.L. & Stander, L., 2019. "Regional employment and economic growth effects of South Africa’s transition to low-carbon energy supply mix," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 830-837.
    11. Aragón, Fernando M. & Rud, Juan Pablo & Toews, Gerhard, 2018. "Resource shocks, employment, and gender: Evidence from the collapse of the UK coal industry," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-67.
    12. Marcos-Martinez, Raymundo & Measham, Thomas G. & Fleming-Muñoz, David A., 2019. "Economic impacts of early unconventional gas mining: Lessons from the coal seam gas industry in New South Wales, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 338-346.
    13. Acar, Sevil & Yeldan, A. Erinc, 2016. "Environmental impacts of coal subsidies in Turkey: A general equilibrium analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Bing Wang & Chao-Qun Cui & Yi-Xin Zhao & Bo Yang & Qing-Zhou Yang, 2019. "Carbon emissions accounting for China’s coal mining sector: invisible sources of climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 99(3), pages 1345-1364, December.
    15. Qing Feng & Qian Huang & Qingyan Zheng & Li Lu, 2018. "New Carbon Emissions Allowance Allocation Method Based on Equilibrium Strategy for Carbon Emission Mitigation in the Coal-Fired Power Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Ragchaasuren Galindev & Tsolmon Baatarzorig & Nyambaatar Batbayar & Delgermaa Begz & Unurjargal Davaa & Oyunzul Tserendorj, 2019. "The Economic and Environmental Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Mongolian Coal-Export Sector," Working Papers MPIA 2019-21, PEP-MPIA.
    17. Clark, Richard & Zucker, Noah & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2020. "The future of coal-fired power generation in Southeast Asia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    18. Dejun Qiu & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel & Gözde Gülseven Ubay, 2020. "Multi-Faceted Analysis of Systematic Risk-Based Wind Energy Investment Decisions in E7 Economies Using Modified Hybrid Modeling with IT2 Fuzzy Sets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, March.
    19. Yuan, Jiahai & Li, Xinying & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhao, Changhong & Liu, Yuanxin, 2019. "Investment risk assessment of coal-fired power plants in countries along the Belt and Road initiative based on ANP-Entropy-TODIM method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 623-640.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gang Kou & Özlem Olgu Akdeniz & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Sun, Liangliang & Peng, Jiayu & Dinçer, Hasan & Yüksel, Serhat, 2022. "Coalition-oriented strategic selection of renewable energy system alternatives using q-ROF DEMATEL with golden cut," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Yiqing Zhao & Renata Korsakienė & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2022. "Identifying Significant Points of Energy Culture for Developing Sustainable Energy Investments," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    4. Yujing Xiang & Qinli Zhang & Daolin Wang & Shihai Wu, 2022. "Mining Investment Risk Assessment for Nations along the Belt and Road Initiative," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    5. Mukhtarov, Shahriyar & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2022. "The impact of financial development on renewable energy consumption: Evidence from Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 169-176.
    6. Niu, Xiaoqin & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2023. "Emission strategy selection for the circular economy-based production investments with the enhanced decision support system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    7. Zhou, Pengfei & Luo, Jie & Cheng, Fei & Yüksel, Serhat & Dinçer, Hasan, 2021. "Analysis of risk priorities for renewable energy investment projects using a hybrid IT2 hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with alpha cuts," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galina Williams & Ruth Nikijuluw, 2020. "The economic and social benefit of coal mining: the case study of regional Queensland," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(4), pages 1113-1132, October.
    2. Cardoso, Andrea & Turhan, Ethemcan, 2018. "Examining new geographies of coal: Dissenting energyscapes in Colombia and Turkey," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 398-408.
    3. Maria Taljegard & Lisa Göransson & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson, 2021. "To Represent Electric Vehicles in Electricity Systems Modelling—Aggregated Vehicle Representation vs. Individual Driving Profiles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Stephan E. Maurer & Andrei V. Potlogea, 2021. "Male‐biased Demand Shocks and Women's Labour Force Participation: Evidence from Large Oil Field Discoveries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(349), pages 167-188, January.
    5. Syed Hasan & Odmaa Narantungalag, & Martin Berka, 2022. "The intended and unintended consequences of large electricity subsidies: evidence from Mongolia," Discussion Papers 2202, School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
    6. Ozcan, Mustafa, 2018. "The role of renewables in increasing Turkey's self-sufficiency in electrical energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2629-2639.
    7. Yuxin Huang & Jingdao Fan & Zhenguo Yan & Shugang Li & Yanping Wang, 2021. "Research on Early Warning for Gas Risks at a Working Face Based on Association Rule Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Chen, Lichun & Wen, Chang & Wang, Wenyu & Liu, Tianyu & Liu, Enze & Liu, Haowen & Li, Zexin, 2020. "Combustion behaviour of biochars thermally pretreated via torrefaction, slow pyrolysis, or hydrothermal carbonisation and co-fired with pulverised coal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 867-877.
    9. T. Sivageerthi & Bathrinath Sankaranarayanan & Syed Mithun Ali & Ali AlArjani & Koppiahraj Karuppiah, 2022. "Modeling Challenges for Improving the Heat Rate Performance in a Thermal Power Plant: Implications for SDGs in Energy Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Arvanitopoulos, T. & Agnolucci, P., 2020. "The long-term effect of renewable electricity on employment in the United Kingdom," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    11. Huntington, Hillard G. & Barrios, James J. & Arora, Vipin, 2019. "Review of key international demand elasticities for major industrializing economies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    12. Xixi Luo & Quanlong Liu & Xuefeng Song, 2023. "China's strategies for promoting differentiated urban resilience measurement from the social ecosystem perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 235-249, January.
    13. Marc Bascompta & Lluís Sanmiquel & Carla Vintró & Mohammad Yousefian, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility Index for Mine Sites," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Jiang, Xu & Xu, Jun & He, Qichen & Wang, Cong & Jiang, Long & Xu, Kai & Wang, Yi & Su, Sheng & Hu, Song & Du, Zhenyi & Xiang, Jun, 2023. "A study of the relationships between coal heterogeneous chemical structure and pyrolysis behaviours: Mechanism and predicting model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    15. Guettabi, Mouhcine & James, Alexander, 2020. "Who benefits from an oil boom? Evidence from a unique Alaskan data set," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Srivastav, Sugandha & Singh, Tanmay, 2022. "Greening our Laws: Revising Land Acquisition Law for Coal Mining in India," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-09, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    17. Domazet, Mladen & Ančić, Branko, 2019. "Complementarity between the EJ movement and degrowth on the European semiperiphery: An empirical study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 120-128.
    18. Stavros Kalogiannidis, 2020. "Impact of Plant Closures on Urban and Regional Communities: A Case Study of South Australian Gas Industry and its Workers," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 994-1010.
    19. Gang Kou & Özlem Olgu Akdeniz & Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel, 2021. "Fintech investments in European banks: a hybrid IT2 fuzzy multidimensional decision-making approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-28, December.
    20. Shi, Kaiqi & Oladejo, Jumoke Mojisola & Yan, Jiefeng & Wu, Tao, 2019. "Investigation on the interactions among lignocellulosic constituents and minerals of biomass and their influences on co-firing," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 129-137.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:10:p:2453-:d:357619. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.