A new micro view of the U.S. rural economy
AbstractRural areas are thought to have two salient features, remoteness and small scale, that tend to inhibit economic growth. These features have explained at least partially why economic growth in the nation's rural areas has often trailed that in metropolitan areas. However, the rural economic turnaround in the 1990s, while not uniform, suggests that some rural communities may have found ways of overcoming their remoteness and small scale. Put simply, some rural areas appear to have an advantage over others in terms of economic growth rates.> How have rural economies been performing and why have some been able to perform better than others? Accurate answers to these questions are hard to come by. Typically, the performance of the nation's rural counties is compared with the performance of metropolitan counties, and then a summary comparison is drawn. But such an aggregate approach has drawbacks. One conceptual weakness is that rural places usually compete for economic activity with the metropolitan area at the center of their economic sphere, not with all metropolitan areas. In short, the usual macro view of the rural economy may overlook critical micro information and linkages.> Henry and Drabenstott use a new micro-region approach to measure and explain rural economic performance. They measure rural economic performance by assessing performance within a framework of multicounty economic regions, each of which has a metropolitan center and a surrounding area. Their analysis reveals that rural counties in a surprising number of micro-regions throughout the nation are adding jobs at a faster rate than their neighboring metropolitan area. The authors further consider the factors that appear to explain why some rural places have been enjoying solid job growth, and they discuss the implications of these micro-level findings for public and private decisionmakers.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in its journal Economic Review.
Volume (Year): (1996)
Issue (Month): Q II ()
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Khan, Romana & Orazem, Peter & Otto, Daniel, 2001.
"Deriving Empirical Definitions of Spatial Labor Markets: The Roles of Competing Versus Complementary Growth,"
Staff General Research Papers
5205, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
- Romana Khan & Peter F. Orazem & Daniel M. Otto, 2001. "Deriving Empirical Definitions of Spatial Labor Markets: The Roles of Competing Versus Complementary Growth," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 735-756.
- Khan, Romana & Orazem, Peter F. & Otto, Daniel M., 1998. "Deriving Empirical Definitions Of Spatial Labor Markets: The Roles Of Competing Versus Complementary Growth," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 21007, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Lackey, Steven Brent & Wojan, Timothy R., 1999.
"Manufacturing Specialization In The Southeast: Rural Necessity, Rural Possibility Or Rural Vestige?,"
1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN
21605, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Wojan, Timothy R. & Lackey, Steven Brent, 2000. "Manufacturing Specialization in the Southeast: Rural Necessity, Rural Possibility, or Rural Vestige?," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 30(2), pages 167-187, Fall.
- Henderson, Jason R. & McDaniel, Kendall, 2000. "The Impact Of Scenic Amenities On Rural Employment Growth," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21725, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Rupasingha, Anil & Goetz, Stephan J., 2007. "Social and political forces as determinants of poverty: A spatial analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 650-671, August.
- Barkley, David L. & Kim, Yunsoo & Henry, Mark S., 2001. "Do Manufacturing Plants Cluster Across Rural Areas? Evidence From A Probabilistic Modeling Approach," REDRL Research Reports 18796, Clemson University, Regional Economic Development Research Laboratory (REDRL).
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (LDayrit).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.