IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i2bp78-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply Chain Performance Measurement System of Logistics Service Providers vs. Supply Chain Performance: A Conceptual Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Rafal Haffer

Abstract

Purpose: This conceptual paper explores the relationship between the generation of logistics service providers (LSPs), the scope of LSP supply chain performance measurement system (LSP SCPMS), and the corresponding impact on the supply chain (SC) performance. We propose that among LSPs applying SCPMSs, the generation of LSPs may affect the scope of LSP SCPMS, which may influence SC performance. Building on extant research, we present a conceptual framework, with the agency theory incorporating SC risk management concept, the resource-based view (RBV) and the rational view, an extension of RBV incorporating social network theory as the framework’s foundation. The initial hypotheses in this research proposal are each supported by the respective literature. Design/Methodology/Approach: As a conceptual paper, it is based on the literature review focusing on looking for the research gaps and responding to the recent calls in strategy research. Findings: The scope of LSP SCPMS and potential ramifications of LSP generation for the SC performance is an under-researched topic. In the present paper an attempt to consolidate knowledge on LSP supply chain performance measurement systems and its impact on SC performance has been made. The study as a research proposal makes a two-fold contribution to the discussion. First, it distinguishes the research questions and initial hypotheses. Secondly, a research methodology is proposed where qualitative methods are emphasised. Originality/Value: This study proposal contributes to a better understanding of the relationship between the scope of LSP supply chain performance measurement system and its impact on the supply chain performance, including the context of the LSP generation, which is proposed as a control variable in the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafal Haffer, 2021. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System of Logistics Service Providers vs. Supply Chain Performance: A Conceptual Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 78-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:78-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/2204/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jayaram, Jayanth & Tan, Keah-Choon, 2010. "Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 262-271, June.
    2. Stephan Duschek, 2004. "Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," management revue. Socio-economic Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 15(1), pages 53-73.
    3. François Fulconis & Gilles Paché, 2018. "Supply Chain Monitoring: LLPs and 4PL Providers as Orchestrators," Post-Print hal-01790461, HAL.
    4. Braz, Renata Gomes Frutuoso & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Martins, Roberto Antonio, 2011. "Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: An action research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 751-760, October.
    5. Stephan Duschek, 2004. "Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 15(1), pages 53-73.
    6. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    7. Krakovics, Fabio & Eugenio Leal, José & Mendes Jr., Paulo & Lorenzo Santos, Rafael, 2008. "Defining and calibrating performance indicators of a 4PL in the chemical industry in Brazil," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 502-514, October.
    8. Orton, James Douglas, 1997. "From inductive to iterative grounded theory: Zipping the gap between process theory and process data," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 419-438, December.
    9. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    10. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Claudia Bird Schoonhoven, 1996. "Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 136-150, April.
    11. Rafał Haffer, 2018. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Of Logistics Service Providers. A Conceptual Framework And Research Agenda," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 85-108.
    12. John A. Mathews, 2003. "Competitive dynamics and economic learning: an extended resource-based view," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 12(1), pages 115-145, February.
    13. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    14. B Ritchie & C Brindley, 2007. "An emergent framework for supply chain risk management and performance measurement," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(11), pages 1398-1411, November.
    15. Maestrini, Vieri & Luzzini, Davide & Maccarrone, Paolo & Caniato, Federico, 2017. "Supply chain performance measurement systems: A systematic review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 299-315.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Singh, Rashmeet & Chandrashekar, Deepak & Subrahmanya Mungila Hillemane, Bala & Sukumar, Arun & Jafari-Sadeghi, Vahid, 2022. "Network cooperation and economic performance of SMEs: Direct and mediating impacts of innovation and internationalisation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 116-130.
    2. Damian Dubisz & Paulina Golinska-Dawson, 2021. "Carbon Footprint Management within a Supply Chain – A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2B), pages 860-870.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafał Haffer, 2018. "Supply Chain Performance Measurement System Of Logistics Service Providers. A Conceptual Framework And Research Agenda," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 18, pages 85-108.
    2. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg, 2012. "A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 311-326.
    3. Nigel Driffield & Jun Du & Jan Godsell & Mark Hart & Katiuscia Lavoratori & Steven Roper & Irina Surdu & Wanrong Zhang, 2021. "Understanding productivity:Organisational Capital perspectives," Working Papers 013, The Productivity Institute.
    4. David G. Sirmon & Michael A. Hitt, 2003. "Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 27(4), pages 339-358, October.
    5. López Zapata, Esteban & García Muiña, Fernando Enrique & García, Susana María, 2019. "Analysing the relationship between diversification strategy and firm performance: the role of the economic cycle," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    6. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    7. Esthela Galván-Vela & Eduardo Arango Herrera & Deisy Milena Sorzano Rodríguez & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll, 2021. "State-of-the-Art Analysis of Intrapreneurship: A Review of the Theoretical Construct and Its Bibliometrics," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. El Baz, Jamal & Ruel, Salomée, 2021. "Can supply chain risk management practices mitigate the disruption impacts on supply chains’ resilience and robustness? Evidence from an empirical survey in a COVID-19 outbreak era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    9. Belén Payán‐Sánchez & Miguel Pérez‐Valls & José Antonio Plaza‐Úbeda & Diego Vázquez‐Brust, 2022. "Network ambidexterity and environmental performance: Code‐sharing in the airline industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1169-1183, March.
    10. John Hamilton, 2020. "The Strategic Change Matrix and Business Sustainability across COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Aurélien Acquier & Cedric Dalmasso, 2013. "Combining Strategic Agility and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: the need for Resource Sensitivity," Post-Print hal-01487685, HAL.
    12. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien, 2013. "The experience of time in the inter-organizing inquiry: A present thickened by dialog and situations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 48-62.
    13. Peter Wirtz, 2011. "Beyond Agency Theory: Value Creation and the Role of Cognition in the Relationship Between Entrepreneurs and Venture Capitalists," Springer Books, in: Advances in Entrepreneurial Finance, chapter 0, pages 31-43, Springer.
    14. Sven Kunisch & Markus Menz & David Collis, 2020. "Corporate headquarters in the twenty-first century: an organization design perspective," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-32, December.
    15. Yeung, Kwong & Zhou, Honggeng & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The impact of third-party logistics providers' capabilities on exporters' performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 741-753.
    16. Xie, Qiuhao & Gao, Ying & Xia, Nini & Zhang, Shuibo & Tao, Guowu, 2023. "Coopetition and organizational performance outcomes: A meta-analysis of the main and moderator effects," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Moriah Meyskens & Colleen Robb–Post & Jeffrey A. Stamp & Alan L. Carsrud & Paul D. Reynolds, 2010. "Social Ventures from a Resource–Based Perspective: An Exploratory Study Assessing Global Ashoka Fellows," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 661-680, July.
    18. Jongwook Kim & Joseph T. Mahoney, 2005. "Property rights theory, transaction costs theory, and agency theory: an organizational economics approach to strategic management," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 223-242.
    19. Reuter, Ute, 2011. "Der ressourcenbasierte Ansatz als theoretischer Bezugsrahmen: Grundlagen, Theoriebausteine und Prozessorientierung," Research Papers on Innovation, Services and Technology 3/2011, University of Stuttgart, Institute of Business Administration, Department I - Institute of Research & Development and Innovation Management.
    20. Oliveira, Fabio & Kakabadse, Nada & Khan, Nadeem, 2022. "Board engagement with digital technologies: A resource dependence framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 804-818.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    LSP supply chain performance measurement system (LSP SCPMS); logistics service providers (LSPs); supply chain (SC) performance; conceptual framework.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:78-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.