IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial2p779-803.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Aneta Jarosz-Angowska
  • Marek Angowski
  • Magdalena Kakol
  • Anna Nowak
  • Monika Rozanska-Boczula

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aimed to evaluate the competitive potential of the agricultural and food sector in the member states of the European Union and identify differences between them with reference to the position of such countries in international agricultural and food trade. Design/Methodology/Approach: The competitive potential was evaluated using a synthetic measure designed using TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution). The potential was confronted with the competitive position of the member states of the European Union in the international trade in agricultural and food products. To this end, among other indicators, the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index was used. The analysis was based on data from EUROSTAT and FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network) for years 2007-2017. Findings: The results point to a strong diversification of the level of agricultural development among the member states of the European Union. Four groups of countries characterised by a similar level of the analysed phenomenon were identified. The highest value of the synthetic measure was characteristic of the Netherlands. It was more than 3 times higher than in the country least competitive in that respect (Slovenia). Countries with the highest agricultural competitive potential such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark and France, also maintain a high competitive advantage in the international agricultural and food trade. Many countries, in particular those included in EU-12 (Malta, Romania, Bulgaria, Poland) in the analysed period 2007-2017 significantly improved their competitive position in the agricultural and food trade despite a small increase in the competitive potential of agriculture. Practical Implications: The surveys made it possible to identify countries (mainly new member states of the EU) in which, despite relatively large resources of production factors in agriculture, the competitive potential measured with an aggregate measure designed in this paper, taking into account primarily an advantage in terms of quality and not costs and prices, is low. This points to a need for orienting the Common Agricultural Policy at boosting the dynamics of structural transformations in this sector so that in the future these countries are able to maintain a high competitive position in agricultural and food trade. Originality/Value: An added value of this paper is the analysis of multiple factors affecting the competitiveness of the agricultural and food sector and identification of a group of EU countries by means of a synthetic measure designed using TOPSIS, whereas most papers investigate the effect of one factor with a limited number of competitiveness measures. The analysis of relationships between the competitive capacity and the international competitive position of the countries of the European Union in agricultural and food products further contributes to the originality of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Marek Angowski & Magdalena Kakol & Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula, 2020. "Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 779-803.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special2:p:779-803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1898/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Economic Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-11833-4, December.
    2. Robert M. Stern, 1962. "British And American Productivity And Comparative Costs In International Trade," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 275-296.
    3. Olivera Kostoska & Ilija Hristoski, 2018. "Trade Dynamics, Revealed Comparative Advantage, And International Competitiveness: Evidence From Macedonia," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 63(218), pages 23-60, July – Se.
    4. V. Eldon Ball & Jean‐Pierre Butault & Carlos San Juan & Ricardo Mora, 2010. "Productivity and international competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union and the United States," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(6), pages 611-627, November.
    5. Yercan, Murat & Isikli, Emin, 2006. "International competitiveness of Turkish agriculture: A case for horticultural products," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10110, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Helpman, Elhanan, 2011. "Understanding Global Trade," Economics Books, Harvard University Press, number 9780674060784, Spring.
    7. Pawlak, Karolina, 2012. "Importance and competitive advantage of the European Union countries in trade in agri-food products," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 12(27), pages 1-8, September.
    8. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Business Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-18652-4, December.
    9. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Economic Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-18565-7, December.
    10. Drabik, Dusan & Bartova, Lubica, 2008. "Agri-food Trade Specialisation Pattern in the New EU Member States," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44124, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Sarker, Rakhal & Ratnesena, Shashini, 2014. "Revealed Comparative Advantage and Half-A-Century Competitiveness of Canadian Agriculture: A Case Study of Wheat, Beef and Pork Sectors," Working Papers 165675, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    12. Štefan Bojnec & Imre Fertő, 2008. "European Enlargement and Agro‐Food Trade," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 563-579, December.
    13. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Business Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-11872-3, December.
    14. Aneta Jarosz-Angowska, 2019. "Assessment of the Importance of Agri-Food Products Trade Between the European Union and China," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), Eurasian Economic Perspectives, pages 105-123, Springer.
    15. William A. Kerr & James D. Gaisford (ed.), 2007. "Handbook on International Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3521.
    16. Matthew Gorton & Sophia Davidova & Martin Banse & Alistair Bailey, 2006. "The International Competitiveness of Hungarian Agriculture: Past Performance and Future Projections," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 69-84.
    17. Olena Maksymets & Lars Lönnstedt, 2016. "International Competitiveness: A Case Study of American, Swedish, and Ukrainian Forest Industries," The International Trade Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 159-176, March.
    18. Franić, Ramona & Jurišić, Žaklina & Gelo, Ružica, 2014. "Food production and rural development – Croatian perspective within the European context," Agroeconomia Croatica, Croatian Society of Agricultural Economists, vol. 4(1), pages 1-9, July.
    19. YAO, Wen, 2015. "Impact of Agricultural Modernization, Economic Growth and Industrialization on the International Competitiveness of Agricultural Products: Based on the Empirical Analysis of Cointegration and VEC Mode," Asian Agricultural Research, USA-China Science and Culture Media Corporation, vol. 7(03), pages 1-7, March.
    20. Stephen Golub, 1995. "Comparative and absolute advantage in the Asia-Pacific region," Pacific Basin Working Paper Series 95-09, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    21. Judit KISS, 2011. "Some impacts of the EU accession on the new member states’ agriculture," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 2, pages 49-60, December.
    22. Qing Xiao & Michael Reed, 2007. "Export and production growth: evidence from three major wheat exporters of Australia, Canada and the United States," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 309-319.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Nowak & Armand Kasztelan, 2022. "Economic competitiveness vs. green competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union countries," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 379-405, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula & Artur Krukowski, 2020. "Competitiveness of Agriculture in New Member States of the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 160-175.
    2. Yuanyuan Hu & Shouming Chen & Fangjun Qiu & Peien Chen & Shaoxiong Chen, 2021. "Will the Volume-Based Procurement Policy Promote Pharmaceutical Firms’ R&D Investment in China? An Event Study Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Ireneusz Miciuła & Henryk Wojtaszek & Bogdan Włodarczyk & Marek Szturo & Miłosz Gac & Jerzy Będźmirowski & Katarzyna Kazojć & Judyta Kabus, 2021. "The Current Picture of the Transition to a Green Economy in the EU—Trends in Climate and Energy Policy versus State Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Artur Wyszyński, 2021. "Niewypłacalność zawodowych klubów piłki nożnej," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, vol. 1, pages 142-166, January.
    5. Jámbor, Attila & Kovács, Sándor & Somai, Miklós, 2016. "Tíz év az Európai Unióban - az új tagországok agrárteljesítményei [A decade in the EU: the agricultural performances of the new member-states]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(3), pages 260-284.
    6. Jambor, Attila & Sirone Varadi, Julia, 2014. "10 years of EU membership: winners and losers in the agri-food sector of the new member states," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182736, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Jámbor, Attila & Tóth, Andrea Tímea & Kőröshegyi, Domonkos, 2017. "Az agrárexport versenyképessége - a nemzetközi fűszer-kereskedelem esete [Export competitiveness in agriculture: the case of the international spice trade]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(11), pages 1202-1223.
    8. Beňuš Ondrej, 2019. "Competitiveness of the Czech Meat Industry on the Single Market," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 443-461, September.
    9. Jaroslav Mihálik & Michal Garaj & Jakub Bardovič, 2022. "Social Media and Political Communication of Youth Political Organisations in Slovakia, Czechia and European Level: A Cross-Case Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-32, February.
    10. Crespi, John M. & Hahn, William & Jones, Keithly & Schulz, Lee L. & Chen, Chen-Ti, 2016. "A Study in U.S. Export Beef Competitiveness: Do Cattle Inventories Matter?," 2017 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 6-8, 2017, Chicago, Illinois 250113, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Anna Nowak & Elżbieta Kołodziej & Hanna Klikocka, 2022. "Effect of European Integration on the Competitiveness of the Agricultural Sector in New Member States (EU-13) on the Internal EU Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    12. Csaki, Csaba & Jambor, Attila, 2015. "10 Years of EU Membership: The case of the NMS agri-food sector," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211552, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Elhanan Helpman, 2014. "Foreign Trade and Investment: Firm-level Perspectives," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(321), pages 1-14, January.
    14. Hoang, Viet Van & Tran, Khai Tien & Tu, Binh Van, 2017. "Assessing the Agricultural Competitive Advantage by the RTA index: A Case Study in Vietnam," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(3), September.
    15. Jambor, Attila, 2013. "Comparative Advantages and Specialisation of the Visegrad Countries Agri-Food Trade," Acta Oeconomica et Informatica, Faculty of Economics and Management, Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra (FEM SPU), vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, February.
    16. Csaba Csaki & Attila Jambor, 2019. "Convergence or divergence - Transition in agriculture of Central and Eastern Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States revisited," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 160-174.
    17. Haarhaus, Tim & Strunk, Guido & Liening, Andreas, 2020. "Assessing the complex dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A nonstationary approach," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    18. Miklós VÁSÁRY, 2013. "Foreign trade trends in the Hungarian-Romanian turnover of agricultural products," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4, pages 81-103, June.
    19. Carraresi, Laura & Banterle, Alessandro, 2015. "Agri-food Competitive Performance in EU Countries: A Fifteen-Year Retrospective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, May.
    20. Han, Jin & Ruan, Yi & Wang, Yanmin & Zhou, Haibo, 2021. "Toward a complex adaptive system: The case of the Zhongguancun entrepreneurship ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 537-550.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitive potential; competitive position; international trade; agriculture.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special2:p:779-803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.