IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial1p160-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competitiveness of Agriculture in New Member States of the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Nowak
  • Monika Rozanska-Boczula
  • Artur Krukowski

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to evaluate the competitiveness of agriculture in new member states of the European Union. Design/Methodology/Approach: The competitiveness of agriculture was evaluated based on characteristics describing relations between production factors, their productivity, and the significance of agriculture in international trade. The survey was carried out for 2007 and 2017 using selected cluster analysis methods and principal component analysis (PCA). Findings: In both analyzed years, two groups of countries having similar characteristics describing the competitiveness of agriculture were identified. A clear difference was observed between new and old EU member states in terms of the agricultural sector's competitiveness. The first group characterized by better values adopted for the analysis of variables in 2007 was countries of the so-called "old Union," consisting of 15 member states (excluding Portugal and Greece), and in 2017 this group did not include Austria. An additional value of the survey was that it identified the characteristics that had the largest share in explaining the variability of the analyzed phenomenon, creating grounds for formulating recommendations concerning measures in the European Union's agricultural policy. Practical Implications: Considering the diagnosed factors that, to the largest extent, determined the classification of the countries to a specific group according to the level of agricultural competitiveness, it is possible to formulate recommendations regarding measures undertaken under CAP. They should be oriented at boosting the dynamics of structural changes in the agriculture of new member states. Originality/Value: This paper focuses on a wide range of variables. Groups of countries most similar in terms of agricultural competitiveness were identified, and the characteristics of countries that had the largest influence on the above-mentioned classification were compared and defined.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula & Artur Krukowski, 2020. "Competitiveness of Agriculture in New Member States of the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 160-175.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:160-175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1752/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lajos Baráth & Imre Fertő, 2017. "Productivity and Convergence in European Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(1), pages 228-248, February.
    2. Carraresi, Laura & Banterle, Alessandro, 2015. "Agri-food Competitive Performance in EU Countries: A Fifteen-Year Retrospective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Frohberg, Klaus & Hartmann, Monika, 1997. "Comparing measures of competitiveness," IAMO Discussion Papers 2, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Maria Carmen Cuerva, 2011. "Dynamics of European agricultural productivity: An analysis of regional convergence," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 92(3), pages 237-258.
    5. V. Eldon Ball & Jean‐Pierre Butault & Carlos San Juan & Ricardo Mora, 2010. "Productivity and international competitiveness of agriculture in the European Union and the United States," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(6), pages 611-627, November.
    6. Pawlak, Karolina, 2012. "Importance and competitive advantage of the European Union countries in trade in agri-food products," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 12(27), pages 1-8, September.
    7. Douglas Gollin & Stephen Parente & Richard Rogerson, 2002. "The Role of Agriculture in Development," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 160-164, May.
    8. Munisamy Gopinath & Carlos Arnade & Mathew Shane & Terry Roe, 1997. "Agricultural competitiveness: The case of the United States and major EU countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 16(2), pages 99-109, May.
    9. Cuerva, Maria C., 2011. "Dynamics of European agricultural productivity: An analysis of regional convergence," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 92(03), pages 237-258, September.
    10. Matthew Gorton & Sophia Davidova & Tomas Ratinger, 2000. "The Competitiveness of Agriculture in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic Vis-à-Vis the European Union (CEEC and EU Agricultural Competitiveness)," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 42(1), pages 59-86, April.
    11. Thomas Hatzichronoglou, 1996. "Globalisation and Competitiveness: Relevant Indicators," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1996/5, OECD Publishing.
    12. Judit KISS, 2011. "Some impacts of the EU accession on the new member states’ agriculture," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 2, pages 49-60, December.
    13. Qing Xiao & Michael Reed, 2007. "Export and production growth: evidence from three major wheat exporters of Australia, Canada and the United States," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 309-319.
    14. Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka, 2016. "The Role Of Agriculture In The National Economy Of Eu Countries," Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland, vol. 42(4).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Duda & Anna Wolak-Tuzimek & Lukasz Wojtowicz, 2021. "Competition Instruments Applied by Large Enterprises during the Crisis Triggered by the COVID-19 Pandemic," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 139-151.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karolina Pawlak & Luboš Smutka & Pavel Kotyza, 2021. "Agricultural Potential of the EU Countries: How Far Are They from the USA?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Marek Angowski & Magdalena Kakol & Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula, 2020. "Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 779-803.
    3. Arkadiusz Kijek & Tomasz Kijek & Anna Nowak, 2020. "Club convergence of labour productivity in agriculture: Evidence from EU countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 391-401.
    4. Małgorzata Juchniewicz & Katarzyna Łukiewska, 2021. "Diversity of the international competitive performance of the food industry of the European Union member states," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 422-437, April.
    5. Anna Nowak & Anna Kobiałka & Artur Krukowski, 2021. "Significance of Agriculture for Bioeconomy in the Member States of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Renata Matysik-Pejas & Małgorzata Bogusz & Kamila Daniek & Monika Szafrańska & Łukasz Satoła & Andrzej Krasnodębski & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "An Assessment of the Spatial Diversification of Agriculture in the Conditions of the Circular Economy in European Union Countries," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Joseph Misati Akuma, 2014. "Social Protection for Orphaned and Vulnerable Children in Kenya: Initiatives, Opportunities and Challenges," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, September.
    8. Karolina Pawlak & Walenty Poczta, 2020. "Agricultural Resources and their Productivity: A Transatlantic Perspective," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 18-49.
    9. Tomasz Rokicki & Aleksandra Perkowska & Bogdan Klepacki & Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Konrad Michalski, 2021. "Changes in Energy Consumption in Agriculture in the EU Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    10. Marzec, Jerzy & Pisulewski, Andrzej, 2019. "The Measurement of Time Varying Technical Efficiency and Productivity Change in Polish Crop Farms," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(1), March.
    11. Hoang, Viet Van & Tran, Khai Tien & Tu, Binh Van, 2017. "Assessing the Agricultural Competitive Advantage by the RTA index: A Case Study in Vietnam," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 9(3), September.
    12. Jerzy Marzec & Andrzej Pisulewski, 2020. "Pomiar efektywności zróżnicowanych technologicznie gospodarstw rolnych w Unii Europejskiej," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 3, pages 111-137.
    13. Kirschke, D. & Weber, G., 2004. "Internationale Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und Optionen für die EU-Agrarpolitik," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 39.
    14. Vasilii Erokhin & Li Diao & Peiran Du, 2020. "Sustainability-Related Implications of Competitive Advantages in Agricultural Value Chains: Evidence from Central Asia—China Trade and Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, February.
    15. Mihaela KRUZSLICIKA, 2021. "Factor Productivity And Influence On The Degree Of Convergence In The Cereal Sector," Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 18(2), pages 285-299.
    16. repec:kap:iaecre:v:16:y:2010:i:2:p:223-236 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Petrick, Martin, 2004. "Can Econometric Analysis Make (Agricultural) Economics A Hard Science? Critical Remarks And Implications For Economic Methodology," IAMO Discussion Papers 14911, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    18. Graziella Bertocchi, 2011. "The Vanishing Bequest Tax: The Comparative Evolution Of Bequest Taxation In Historical Perspective," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(1), pages 107-131, March.
    19. Matthias Doepke, "undated". "Growth Takeoffs," UCLA Economics Online Papers 409, UCLA Department of Economics.
    20. Do, Manh Hung & Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Grote, Ulrike, 2023. "Land consolidation, rice production, and agricultural transformation: Evidence from household panel data for Vietnam," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 157-173.
    21. Dietrich Vollrath, 2009. "The dual economy in long-run development," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 287-312, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Competitiveness; agriculture; new member states; cluster analysis; PCA.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:160-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.