IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i22p12037-d680699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Will the Volume-Based Procurement Policy Promote Pharmaceutical Firms’ R&D Investment in China? An Event Study Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanyuan Hu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Shouming Chen

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Fangjun Qiu

    (School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Peien Chen

    (Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA)

  • Shaoxiong Chen

    (Shanghai Biopharmaceutics Industry Association, Shanghai 201203, China)

Abstract

Innovation is the key to the development of the pharmaceutical industry. The pilot program of China’s “4 + 7” volume-based procurement policy (“4 + 7” procurement policy) brings the drug price back to a reasonable level through trading procurement quantities for lower drug prices. The policy manages to reduce the burden of the health care system, improve efficiency, and push the pharmaceutical industry to transform and update from the era of high gross profit of generic drugs to innovative drugs. So far, few studies have investigated the influence of the volume-based procurement policy on the innovation of pharmaceutical firms. By combining the event study and Difference-in-Difference (DiD) methodology, this study finds that the abnormal return (AR) of firms with high R&D intensity is lower than that of firms with low R&D intensity during the event window period. Moreover, further analysis identifies the moderating effect of firm size and firm type. Specifically, the results show that the negative influence of high R&D intensity on abnormal return (AR) during the announcement of the “4 + 7” procurement policy is stronger in large firms and innovative pharmaceutical firms. Finally, we discuss the policy implications of our study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanyuan Hu & Shouming Chen & Fangjun Qiu & Peien Chen & Shaoxiong Chen, 2021. "Will the Volume-Based Procurement Policy Promote Pharmaceutical Firms’ R&D Investment in China? An Event Study Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12037-:d:680699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/22/12037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Askfors, Ylva & Fornstedt, Helena, 2018. "The clash of managerial and professional logics in public procurement: Implications for innovation in the health-care sector," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 78-90.
    2. Wouter Boon & Jakob Edler, 2018. "Demand, challenges, and innovation. Making sense of new trends in innovation policy," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(4), pages 435-447.
    3. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Economic Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-11833-4, December.
    4. Hans Knutsson & Anna Thomasson, 2014. "Innovation in the Public Procurement Process: A study of the creation of innovation-friendly public procurement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 242-255, February.
    5. Honoré, Florence & Munari, Federico & van Pottelsberghe de La Potterie, Bruno, 2015. "Corporate governance practices and companies’ R&D intensity: Evidence from European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 533-543.
    6. William J. Baumol, 1986. "Microtheory: Applications and Origins," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262022451, December.
    7. Grzegorz Zimon & Marek Sobolewski & Grzegorz Lew, 2020. "An Influence of Group Purchasing Organizations on Financial Security of SMEs Operating in the Renewable Energy Sector—Case for Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Rao, Nirupama, 2016. "Do tax credits stimulate R&D spending? The effect of the R&D tax credit in its first decade," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-12.
    9. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Business Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-18652-4, December.
    10. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    11. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Economic Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-18565-7, December.
    12. Lei Chen & Ying Yang & Mi Luo & Borui Hu & Shicheng Yin & Zongfu Mao, 2020. "The Impacts of National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy on Drug Utilization and Drug Expenditures: The Case of Shenzhen, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Fama, Eugene F., 1998. "Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 283-306, September.
    14. Donghua Chen & Saqib Khan & Xin Yu & Zhou Zhang, 2013. "Government Intervention and Investment Comovement: Chinese Evidence," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3-4), pages 564-587, April.
    15. Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), 2019. "Eurasian Business Perspectives," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-030-11872-3, December.
    16. Grzegorz Zimon, 2018. "Influence of group purchasing organizations on financial situation of Polish SMEs," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 9(1), pages 87-104, March.
    17. Grzegorz Zimon, 2019. "The Influence of a Branch Group Purchasing Organization on the Development of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises," Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, in: Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Hakan Danis & Ender Demir & Ugur Can (ed.), Eurasian Business Perspectives, pages 145-153, Springer.
    18. Cui, Huimin & Mak, Y. T., 2002. "The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 313-336, October.
    19. Marco Fasan & Elise Soerger Zaro & Claudio Soerger Zaro & Barbara Porco & Riccardo Tiscini, 2021. "An empirical analysis: Did green supply chain management alleviate the effects of COVID‐19?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2702-2712, July.
    20. Carlos Castro-Iragorri, 2019. "Does the market model provide a good counterfactual for event studies in finance?," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 33(1), pages 71-91, March.
    21. Shilpi Tyagi & D. K. Nauriyal & Rachita Gulati, 2018. "Firm level R&D intensity: evidence from Indian drugs and pharmaceutical industry," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 167-202, January.
    22. Miller, Fiona A. & Lehoux, Pascale, 2020. "The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    23. Paul C. Godfrey & Craig B. Merrill & Jared M. Hansen, 2009. "The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 425-445, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shu Yan & Lizi Pan & Yan Lu & Juan Chen & Ting Zhang & Dongzi Xu & Zhaolian Ouyang, 2023. "Towards Sustainable Drug Supply in China: A Bibliometric Analysis of Drug Reform Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneta Jarosz-Angowska & Marek Angowski & Magdalena Kakol & Anna Nowak & Monika Rozanska-Boczula, 2020. "Agricultural Competitive Potential and Competitive Position in the International Trade of Agricultural and Food Products in the European Union," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 779-803.
    2. Ireneusz Miciuła & Henryk Wojtaszek & Bogdan Włodarczyk & Marek Szturo & Miłosz Gac & Jerzy Będźmirowski & Katarzyna Kazojć & Judyta Kabus, 2021. "The Current Picture of the Transition to a Green Economy in the EU—Trends in Climate and Energy Policy versus State Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-25, December.
    3. Artur Wyszyński, 2021. "Niewypłacalność zawodowych klubów piłki nożnej," Ekonomista, Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne, vol. 1, pages 142-166, January.
    4. Woo Sung Kim & Kunsu Park & Sang Hoon Lee & Hongyoung Kim, 2018. "R&D Investments and Firm Value: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Oliva Maria Dourado Martins & Dragan Ilic & Mădălina Belous & Radu Bucea-Manea-Țoniș & Cezar Braicu & Violeta-Elena Simion, 2020. "Green and Sustainable Public Procurement—An Instrument for Nudging Consumer Behavior. A Case Study on Romanian Green Public Agriculture across Different Sectors of Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Miller, Fiona A. & Lehoux, Pascale, 2020. "The innovation impacts of public procurement offices: The case of healthcare procurement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    7. Selviaridis, Kostas & Hughes, Alan & Spring, Martin, 2023. "Facilitating public procurement of innovation in the UK defence and health sectors: Innovation intermediaries as institutional entrepreneurs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    8. Kieron Flanagan & Elvira Uyarra & Iris Wanzenböck, 2021. "Towards a problem-oriented regional industrial policy: possibilities for public intervention in framing, valuation and market creation," Working Papers 52, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Apr 2021.
    9. Alam, Ashraful & Uddin, Moshfique & Yazdifar, Hassan & Shafique, Sujana & Lartey, Theophilus, 2020. "R&D investment, firm performance and moderating role of system and safeguard: Evidence from emerging markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 94-105.
    10. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Groening, Christopher & Kanuri, Vamsi Krishna, 2013. "Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1852-1860.
    12. Pongsapak Chindasombatcharoen & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Pornsit Jiraporn & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Achieving sustainable development goals through board size and innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 664-677, August.
    13. Chen Weijun, 2022. "The Impact of Government Support and Technological Innovation on Enterprise Performance: A Case Study of Guangdong Hi- tech Enterprises," International Journal of Science and Business, IJSAB International, vol. 14(1), pages 196-231.
    14. Alexander Cuntz (a) And Yi Qian (b), 2021. "The Impacts of Counterfeiting on Corporate Investment," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 46(2), pages 1-40, June.
    15. Jaroslav Mihálik & Michal Garaj & Jakub Bardovič, 2022. "Social Media and Political Communication of Youth Political Organisations in Slovakia, Czechia and European Level: A Cross-Case Analysis," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-32, February.
    16. Muhammad Arif Khan & Meng Bin & Chunlin Wang & Hazrat Bilal & Arshad Ali Khan & Irfan Ullah & Amjad Iqbal & Mohib Ur Rahman, 2023. "Impact of R&D on Firm Performance: Do Ownership Structure and Product Market Competition Matter?," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    17. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 180.
    18. Uyarra, Elvira & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel & Flanagan, Kieron & Magro, Edurne, 2020. "Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(1).
    19. Maretno A. Harjoto & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Marcus A. Nilsson, 2022. "Bondholders’ returns and stakeholders’ interests," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 1271-1301, November.
    20. Dominique Foray, 2022. "The Economics of Incomplete Plan -on Conditions, Procedures and Design of Future Mission- Oriented Innovation Policies," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 243(4), pages 123-146, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:22:p:12037-:d:680699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.