IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v85y2021ics0739885920302201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electric light commercial vehicles for a cleaner urban goods distribution. Are they cost competitive?

Author

Listed:
  • Scorrano, Mariangela
  • Danielis, Romeo
  • Giansoldati, Marco

Abstract

The paper investigates the cost competitiveness of electric light commercial vehicles (eLCVs) with respect to their petrol and diesel counterparts. We develop a detailed total cost of ownership (TCO) model incorporating all relevant costs with special attention to account for variations in engine efficiency between urban and sub-urban trips and by seasons of the year. The model generates two metrics: the threshold purchase price and the threshold annual distance travelled, which are used to compare among propulsion systems and to perform policy scenarios. The model is applied to a large selection of LCVs models available in Europe as of June 2019. We find that eLCVs have on average a higher TCO/km than their conventional counterparts. Yet, the existing offer of eLCVs is differentiated and some eLCV models are cost competitive. We find that four eLCV models belonging to the city and panel segments are convenient relative to their diesel counterparts for daily distances travelled lower than 93 km. Nonetheless, with financial and regulatory incentives, 100% urban driving, and 100% home/depot charging, most of the existing city and panel eLCV models are cost competitive with respect to both their diesel and petrol counterparts.

Suggested Citation

  • Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo & Giansoldati, Marco, 2021. "Electric light commercial vehicles for a cleaner urban goods distribution. Are they cost competitive?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:85:y:2021:i:c:s0739885920302201
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885920302201
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.101022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Figenbaum, Erik, 2018. "Can battery electric light commercial vehicles work for craftsmen and service enterprises?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 58-72.
    2. Cherchi, Elisabetta, 2017. "A stated choice experiment to measure the effect of informational and normative conformity in the preference for electric vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 88-104.
    3. Danielis, Romeo & Rotaris, Lucia & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2010. "Urban freight policies and distribution channels: a discussion based on evidence from Italian cities," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 46, pages 114-146.
    4. Taefi, Tessa T. & Kreutzfeldt, Jochen & Held, Tobias & Fink, Andreas, 2016. "Supporting the adoption of electric vehicles in urban road freight transport – A multi-criteria analysis of policy measures in Germany," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 61-79.
    5. Christensen, Linda & Klauenberg, Jens & Kveiborg, Ole & Rudolph, Christian, 2017. "Suitability of commercial transport for a shift to electric mobility with Denmark and Germany as use cases," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 48-60.
    6. Marmiroli, Benedetta & Venditti, Mattia & Dotelli, Giovanni & Spessa, Ezio, 2020. "The transport of goods in the urban environment: A comparative life cycle assessment of electric, compressed natural gas and diesel light-duty vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Tharsis Teoh & Oliver Kunze & Chee-Chong Teo & Yiik Diew Wong, 2018. "Decarbonisation of Urban Freight Transport Using Electric Vehicles and Opportunity Charging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Gert Berckmans & Maarten Messagie & Jelle Smekens & Noshin Omar & Lieselot Vanhaverbeke & Joeri Van Mierlo, 2017. "Cost Projection of State of the Art Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles Up to 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Zhang, Yong & Jiang, Yunjian & Rui, Weina & Thompson, Russell G., 2019. "Analyzing truck fleets’ acceptance of alternative fuel freight vehicles in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 1148-1155.
    10. Lebeau, Philippe & Macharis, Cathy & Van Mierlo, Joeri, 2016. "Exploring the choice of battery electric vehicles in city logistics: A conjoint-based choice analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 245-258.
    11. Pierre Camilleri & Laetitia Dablanc, 2017. "An assessment of present and future competitiveness of electric commercial vans," Post-Print hal-01539105, HAL.
    12. Miles, John & Potter, Stephen, 2014. "Developing a viable electric bus service: The Milton Keynes demonstration project," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 357-363.
    13. Morganti, Eleonora & Browne, Michael, 2018. "Technical and operational obstacles to the adoption of electric vans in France and the UK: An operator perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 90-97.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hao, Xu & Ou, Shiqi & Lin, Zhenhong & He, Xin & Bouchard, Jessey & Wang, Hewu & Li, Liguo, 2022. "Evaluating the current perceived cost of ownership for buses and trucks in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    2. Tomáš Settey & Jozef Gnap & František Synák & Tomáš Skrúcaný & Marek Dočkalik, 2021. "Research into the Impacts of Driving Cycles and Load Weight on the Operation of a Light Commercial Electric Vehicle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-25, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Maria Patella & Gianluca Grazieschi & Valerio Gatta & Edoardo Marcucci & Stefano Carrese, 2020. "The Adoption of Green Vehicles in Last Mile Logistics: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Magdalena Mucowska, 2021. "Trends of Environmentally Sustainable Solutions of Urban Last-Mile Deliveries on the E-Commerce Market—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    3. Xiaohong Jiang & Xiucheng Guo, 2020. "Evaluation of Performance and Technological Characteristics of Battery Electric Logistics Vehicles: China as a Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Zhangyuan He & Hans-Dietrich Haasis, 2019. "Integration of Urban Freight Innovations: Sustainable Inner-Urban Intermodal Transportation in the Retail/Postal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Bram Kin & Meike Hopman & Hans Quak, 2021. "Different Charging Strategies for Electric Vehicle Fleets in Urban Freight Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Tannaz Jahaniaghdam & Amir Reza Mamdoohi & Salman Aghidi Kheyrabadi & Mehdi Mehryar & Francesco Ciari, 2023. "Preferences for Alternative Fuel Trucks among International Transport Companies," World, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Maxwell Woody & Michael T. Craig & Parth T. Vaishnav & Geoffrey M. Lewis & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2022. "Optimizing future cost and emissions of electric delivery vehicles," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1108-1122, June.
    8. Rodrigues Teixeira, Ana Carolina & Machado, Pedro Gerber & Borges, Raquel Rocha & Felipe Brito, Thiago Luis & Moutinho dos Santos, Edmilson & Mouette, Dominique, 2021. "The use of liquefied natural gas as an alternative fuel in freight transport – Evidence from a driver's point of view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    9. Demeulenaere, Xavier, 2019. "The use of automotive fleets to support the diffusion of Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Rapid Evidence Assessment of barriers and decision mechanisms," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    11. Flávia Mendes de Almeida Collaço & Ana Carolina Rodrigues Teixeira & Pedro Gerber Machado & Raquel Rocha Borges & Thiago Luis Felipe Brito & Dominique Mouette, 2022. "Road Freight Transport Literature and the Achievements of the Sustainable Development Goals—A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Tharsis Teoh & Oliver Kunze & Chee-Chong Teo & Yiik Diew Wong, 2018. "Decarbonisation of Urban Freight Transport Using Electric Vehicles and Opportunity Charging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Stanisław Iwan & Mariusz Nürnberg & Artur Bejger & Kinga Kijewska & Krzysztof Małecki, 2021. "Unloading Bays as Charging Stations for EFV-Based Urban Freight Delivery System—Example of Szczecin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Philip, Thara & Whitehead, Jake & Prato, Carlo G., 2023. "Adoption of electric vehicles in a laggard, car-dependent nation: Investigating the potential influence of V2G and broader energy benefits on adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Jon Martin Denstadli & Tom Erik Julsrud, 2019. "Moving Towards Electrification of Workers’ Transportation: Identifying Key Motives for the Adoption of Electric Vans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Juan C. González Palencia & Van Tuan Nguyen & Mikiya Araki & Seiichi Shiga, 2020. "The Role of Powertrain Electrification in Achieving Deep Decarbonization in Road Freight Transport," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    17. Mohammad Zaher Akkad & Tamás Bányai, 2020. "Multi-Objective Approach for Optimization of City Logistics Considering Energy Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    18. Marc Wentker & Matthew Greenwood & Jens Leker, 2019. "A Bottom-Up Approach to Lithium-Ion Battery Cost Modeling with a Focus on Cathode Active Materials," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Sehyeon Kim & Markus Holz & Soojin Park & Yongbeum Yoon & Eunchel Cho & Junsin Yi, 2021. "Future Options for Lightweight Photovoltaic Modules in Electrical Passenger Cars," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-7, February.
    20. Thorne, Rebecca Jayne & Hovi, Inger Beate & Figenbaum, Erik & Pinchasik, Daniel Ruben & Amundsen, Astrid Helene & Hagman, Rolf, 2021. "Facilitating adoption of electric buses through policy: Learnings from a trial in Norway," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Electric vehicle; Light commercial vehicle; Total cost of ownership; Threshold price; Urban goods distribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:85:y:2021:i:c:s0739885920302201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.