IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v98y2021ics0305048318307072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choices for competing service providers with heterogeneous customers: Traditional versus opaque sales modes

Author

Listed:
  • Feng, Bo
  • Mao, Zhaofang
  • Li, Hui

Abstract

Competing service providers have been conducting opaque sales widely by cooperating with an intermediary, such as Priceline.com and Hotwire.com, to increase capacity flexibility, realise price discrimination and create a new channel for customers. Whether competing service providers should collaborate with an intermediary when facing heterogeneous customers and how a contract design can be made between service providers and the intermediary are two challenging research problems. Recent advances in opaque sales have focused on homogeneous customers, whereas the revenue sharing mechanism for heterogeneous customers has remained unexplored. This study considers two competing service providers that collaborate with an intermediary in a heterogeneous market with leisure and business customers. Styled models are built to capture the traditional and opaque sales modes. The contracting strategies are derived by comparing the profit of the two modes. Considering the simultaneous arrivals of two kinds of customers, we find that the decisions of service providers relate to two factors: the market structure and the revenue sharing mechanisms. In a high-pricing strategy market, service providers may collaborate with an intermediary. Conversely, in a low-pricing strategy market, service providers may not collaborate with an intermediary. In both situations, service providers should strive for a balance between the profit derived from the intermediary and the potential profit loss from opaque sales.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng, Bo & Mao, Zhaofang & Li, Hui, 2021. "Choices for competing service providers with heterogeneous customers: Traditional versus opaque sales modes," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:98:y:2021:i:c:s0305048318307072
    DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048318307072
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102133?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Varian, Hal R, 1980. "A Model of Sales," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(4), pages 651-659, September.
    2. Rachel R. Chen & Esther Gal-Or & Paolo Roma, 2014. "Opaque Distribution Channels for Competing Service Providers: Posted Price vs. Name-Your-Own-Price Mechanisms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 733-750, August.
    3. Fay, Scott & Xie, Jinhong & Feng, Cong, 2015. "The Effect of Probabilistic Selling on the Optimal Product Mix," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 451-467.
    4. Bo Feng & Wei Liu & Zhaofang Mao, 2018. "Use of opaque sales channels in addition to traditional channels by service providers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 3369-3383, May.
    5. Narasimhan, Chakravarthi, 1988. "Competitive Promotional Strategies," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 61(4), pages 427-449, October.
    6. Wagner A. Kamakura & Byung-Do Kim & Jonathan Lee, 1996. "Modeling Preference and Structural Heterogeneity in Consumer Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 152-172.
    7. Courty, Pascal & Liu, Wenyu, 2013. "Opaque Selling: Static or Inter-Temporal Price Discrimination?," CEPR Discussion Papers 9463, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Hu, Benyong & Xu, Dong & Meng, Chao, 2017. "Inconsistency of a retailer's optimal policies and channel performance under revenue sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 53-65.
    9. Tingliang Huang & Yimin Yu, 2014. "Sell Probabilistic Goods? A Behavioral Explanation for Opaque Selling," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 743-759, September.
    10. P. K. Kannan & Gordon P. Wright, 1991. "Modeling and Testing Structured Markets: A Nested Logit Approach," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 58-82.
    11. Steve Dowrick, 1986. "von Stackelberg and Cournot Duopoly: Choosing Roles," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(2), pages 251-260, Summer.
    12. Fay, Scott, 2008. "Selling an opaque product through an intermediary: The case of disguising one's product," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 59-75.
    13. Scott Fay & Jinhong Xie, 2010. "The Economics of Buyer Uncertainty: Advance Selling vs. Probabilistic Selling," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1040-1057, 11-12.
    14. Anderson, Chris K. & Xie, Xiaoqing, 2014. "Pricing and market segmentation using opaque selling mechanisms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 263-272.
    15. Rice, Dan Hamilton & Fay, Scott A. & Xie, Jinhong, 2014. "Probabilistic selling vs. markdown selling: Price discrimination and management of demand uncertainty in retailing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 147-155.
    16. Hu, Benyong & Meng, Chao & Xu, Dong & Son, Young-Jun, 2016. "Three-echelon supply chain coordination with a loss-averse retailer and revenue sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 192-202.
    17. Yao, Z. & Leung, Stephen C.H. & Lai, K.K., 2008. "Manufacturer's revenue-sharing contract and retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(2), pages 637-651, April.
    18. Zelin Zhang & Kissan Joseph & Ramanathan Subramaniam, 2015. "Probabilistic Selling in Quality-Differentiated Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(8), pages 1959-1977, August.
    19. Kinshuk Jerath & Serguei Netessine & Senthil K. Veeraraghavan, 2010. "Revenue Management with Strategic Customers: Last-Minute Selling and Opaque Selling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 430-448, March.
    20. Blaise Allaz & Jean-Luc Vila, 1993. "Cournot Competition, Forward Markets and Efficiency," Post-Print hal-00511806, HAL.
    21. Scott Fay & Jinhong Xie, 2008. "Probabilistic Goods: A Creative Way of Selling Products and Services," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 674-690, 07-08.
    22. Tae Hoon Oum, 1979. "A Warning on the Use of Linear Logit Models in Transport Mode Choice Studies," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 374-388, Spring.
    23. Esther Gal‐Or, 2011. "Pricing Practices of Resellers in the Airline Industry: Posted Price vs. Name‐Your‐Own‐Price Models," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 43-82, March.
    24. Tuo Wang & Esther Gal-Or & Rabikar Chatterjee, 2009. "The Name-Your-Own-Price Channel in the Travel Industry: An Analytical Exploration," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 968-979, June.
    25. Anderson, Simon P & Neven, Damien J, 1991. "Cournot Competition Yields Spatial Agglomeration," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 32(4), pages 793-808, November.
    26. Yuxin Chen & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2001. "Individual Marketing with Imperfect Targetability," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 23-41, November.
    27. Mao, Zhaofang & Liu, Wei & Feng, Bo, 2019. "Opaque distribution channels for service providers with asymmetric capacities: Posted-price mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 112-120.
    28. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yifan Wu & Shibo Jin, 2022. "Joint pricing and inventory decision under a probabilistic selling strategy," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 1209-1233, April.
    2. Guo, Xiaolong & Bian, Junsong & Wu, Peiyan & Shi, Victor & Chen, Huangen, 2023. "Probabilistic product design with regret-anticipated consumers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    3. Guang Yang & Ying Wang & Mulin Liu, 2023. "Optimal Policy for Probabilistic Selling with Three-Way Revenue Sharing Contract under the Perspective of Sustainable Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Zhang, Juliang & Deng, Lan & Liu, Huimin & Cheng, T.C.E., 2022. "Which strategy is better for managing multi-product demand uncertainty: Inventory substitution or probabilistic selling?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 79-95.
    5. Mao, Zhaofang & Liu, Wei & Feng, Bo, 2019. "Opaque distribution channels for service providers with asymmetric capacities: Posted-price mechanisms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 112-120.
    6. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Cheng, T.C.E. & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2020. "Risk pooling through physical probabilistic selling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 295-311.
    7. Aleksandra Kovacheva & Hristina Nikolova, 2024. "Uncertainty marketing tactics: An overview and a unifying framework," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Yeu-Shiang Huang & Tzu-Yi Wu & Chih-Chiang Fang & Tzu-Liang (Bill) Tseng, 2021. "Decisions on Probabilistic Selling for Consumers with Different Risk Attitudes," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 121-138, June.
    9. Qing Li & Christopher S. Tang & He Xu, 2020. "Mitigating the Double‐Blind Effect in Opaque Selling: Inventory and Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 35-54, January.
    10. Quan Zheng & Xiajun Amy Pan & Janice E. Carrillo, 2019. "Probabilistic Selling for Vertically Differentiated Products with Salient Thinkers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 442-460, May.
    11. Fu, Qi & Wang, Qifei & Xu, Xiaoya & Lian, Zhaotong, 2017. "A two-product newsvendor system with a flexible product," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 590-601.
    12. Fay, Scott & Xie, Jinhong & Feng, Cong, 2015. "The Effect of Probabilistic Selling on the Optimal Product Mix," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 451-467.
    13. Rice, Dan Hamilton & Fay, Scott A. & Xie, Jinhong, 2014. "Probabilistic selling vs. markdown selling: Price discrimination and management of demand uncertainty in retailing," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 147-155.
    14. Zhang, Yi & Hua, Guowei & Wang, Shouyang & Zhang, Juliang & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2018. "Managing demand uncertainty: Probabilistic selling versus inventory substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 56-67.
    15. Nosoohi, Iman, 2022. "Posted price and name-your-own-price in a product line design problem," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Yuetao Gao & Yue Wu, 2023. "Regulating Probabilistic Selling of Counterfeits," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(8), pages 4498-4517, August.
    17. Ying He & Huaxia Rui, 2022. "Probabilistic selling in vertically differentiated markets: The role of substitution," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(11), pages 4191-4204, November.
    18. Maxim Sinitsyn, 2016. "Managing Price Promotions Within a Product Line," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 304-318, March.
    19. Gérard P. Cachon, 2020. "A Research Framework for Business Models: What Is Common Among Fast Fashion, E-Tailing, and Ride Sharing?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1172-1192, March.
    20. Yongbo Xiao & Jian Chen, 2014. "Evaluating the potential effects from probabilistic selling of similar products," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(8), pages 604-620, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:98:y:2021:i:c:s0305048318307072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.