IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v68y2015i9p1919-1927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between gender and work related attitudes: a study of temporary agency employees

Author

Listed:
  • Selvarajan, T.T.
  • Slattery, Jeffrey
  • Stringer, Donna Y.

Abstract

The objective of this research is to investigate the relationship between gender and employee attitudes among temporary employees. Drawing on gender role theory, we hypothesized that female temporary employees, compared to male counterparts, will have more positive attitudes toward their organizations. We studied the above relationship in relation to both client organization and temporary agency as temporary employees associate themselves with these two types of organization. We also tested the moderating influence of age and education on the relationship between gender and work-related attitudes. The results based on a survey of temporary employees (N=1261), indicate that female temporary employees have more positive work related attitudes toward the client organization. The results also indicated that education and, to a limited extent, age, acted as a moderator for the relationship between gender and employee attitudes. We discuss implications of these findings for the research and practice of managing temporary employees in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Selvarajan, T.T. & Slattery, Jeffrey & Stringer, Donna Y., 2015. "Relationship between gender and work related attitudes: a study of temporary agency employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1919-1927.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:68:y:2015:i:9:p:1919-1927
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296315000028
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karatepe, Osman M. & Yavas, Ugur & Babakus, Emin & Avci, Turgay, 2006. "Does gender moderate the effects of role stress in frontline service jobs?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(10-11), pages 1087-1093, October.
    2. McColl-Kennedy, Janet R. & Anderson, Ronald D., 2005. "Subordinate-manager gender combination and perceived leadership style influence on emotions, self-esteem and organizational commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 115-125, February.
    3. Spagnoli, Paola & Caetano, Antonio & Santos, Susana Correia, 2012. "Satisfaction with job aspects: Do patterns change over time?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 609-616.
    4. Nabil Ibrahim & John Angelidis & Igor Tomic, 2009. "Managers’ Attitudes Toward Codes of Ethics: Are There Gender Differences?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 343-353, December.
    5. Clark, Andrew E., 1997. "Job satisfaction and gender: Why are women so happy at work?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 341-372, December.
    6. Francis Green & Yu Zhu, 2010. "Overqualification, job dissatisfaction, and increasing dispersion in the returns to graduate education," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 62(4), pages 740-763, October.
    7. Aven, Forrest Jr. & Parker, Barbara & McEvoy, Glenn M., 1993. "Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A Meta-analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 63-73, January.
    8. George A. Akerlof & Rachel E. Kranton, 2000. "Economics and Identity," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 115(3), pages 715-753.
    9. Keith A. Bender & Susan M. Donohue & John S. Heywood, 2005. "Job satisfaction and gender segregation," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 57(3), pages 479-496, July.
    10. McNeilly, Kevin & Goldsmith, Ronald E., 1991. "The moderating effects of gender and performance on job satisfaction and intentions to leave in the sales force," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 219-232, May.
    11. Sousa-Poza, Alfonso & Sousa-Poza, Andres A, 2000. "Taking Another Look at the Gender/Job-Satisfaction Paradox," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 135-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karkoulian, Silva & Srour, Jordan & Sinan, Tala, 2016. "A gender perspective on work-life balance, perceived stress, and locus of control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4918-4923.
    2. Zulqarnain Anwar & Zain Rafique & Aamer Amin & Tahir Mahmood, 2021. "Impact Assessment of Organizational Stress in Agriculture Sector," International Journal of Agriculture & Sustainable Development, 50sea, vol. 3(1), pages 1-7, February.
    3. Alex Makarevich, 2023. "Workplace gender segregation in standard and non‐standard employment regimes in the US labour market," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 697-722, September.
    4. Cuevas-Vargas Héctor & Velázquez-Espinoza Noé & Colín-Salgado Mónica, 2022. "Technological Innovation in Colombian Small Firms: A Gender Multi-Group Analysis," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 46-65, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rafael Lalive & Alois Stutzer, 2010. "Approval of equal rights and gender differences in well-being," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 23(3), pages 933-962, June.
    2. Anastasia Semykina & Susan J. Linz, 2013. "Job Satisfaction and Perceived Gender Equality in Advanced Promotion Opportunities: An Empirical Investigation," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(4), pages 591-619, November.
    3. Tao, Hung-Lin, 2015. "Multiple earnings comparisons and subjective earnings fairness: A cross-country study," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 45-54.
    4. Getinet A. Haile, 2015. "Workplace Job Satisfaction in Britain: Evidence from Linked Employer–Employee Data," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 29(3), pages 225-242, September.
    5. Christian Pfeifer & Gesine Stephan, 2019. "Why women do not ask: gender differences in fairness perceptions of own wages and subsequent wage growth," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 43(2), pages 295-310.
    6. Skalli, Ali & Theodossiou, Ioannis & Vasileiou, Efi, 2008. "Jobs as Lancaster goods: Facets of job satisfaction and overall job satisfaction," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1906-1920, October.
    7. Colin Peter Green & John Spencer Heywood & Parvinder Kler & Gareth Leeves, 2016. "Paradox lost," Working Papers 107134075, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
    8. Jens Bonke & Mette Deding & Mette Lausten, 2009. "Time and Money," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 113-131, April.
    9. Possenriede, Daniel & Plantenga, Janneke, 2014. "Temporal and Locational Flexibility of Work, Working-Time Fit, and Job Satisfaction," IZA Discussion Papers 8436, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Yukawa, Shiho & Arita, Yuki, 2012. "仕事満足度に関するジェンダー間パラドックス [Factor Decomposition of Gender/Job-Satisfaction Paradox: Evidence from Japan]," MPRA Paper 35809, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Joni Hersch & Jean Xiao, 2016. "Sex, Race, and Job Satisfaction Among Highly Educated Workers," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 83(1), pages 1-24, July.
    12. Simon Janssen & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2016. "Occupational Stereotypes and Gender-Specific Job Satisfaction," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 71-91, January.
    13. Keith A. Bender & Kristen Roche, 2016. "Self-employment and the paradox of the contented female worker," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 421-435, August.
    14. Dawson, Chris, 2017. "The upside of pessimism − Biased beliefs and the paradox of the contented female worker," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 215-228.
    15. Laetitia Hauret & Donald R. Williams, 2017. "Cross-National Analysis of Gender Differences in Job Satisfaction," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 203-235, April.
    16. Perugini, Cristiano & Vladisavljević, Marko, 2019. "Gender inequality and the gender-job satisfaction paradox in Europe," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 129-147.
    17. Werner Bönte & Stefan Krabel, 2014. "You can't always get what you want: gender differences in job satisfaction of university graduates," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(21), pages 2477-2487, July.
    18. Colin P. Green & John S. Heywood & Parvinder Kler & Gareth Leeves, 2018. "Paradox Lost: The Disappearing Female Job Satisfaction Premium," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 56(3), pages 484-502, September.
    19. Chad D. Cotti & M. Ryan Haley & Laurie A. Miller, 2014. "Workplace Flexibilities, Job Satisfaction and Union Membership in the US Workforce," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 403-425, September.
    20. Artz, Benjamin & Taengnoi, Sarinda, 2016. "Do women prefer female bosses?," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 194-202.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:68:y:2015:i:9:p:1919-1927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.