This file is part of IDEAS , which uses RePEc data
[ Papers |
Articles |
Software |
Books |
Chapters |
Authors |
Institutions |
JEL Classification |
NEP reports |
Search |
New papers by email |
Author registration |
Rankings |
Volunteers |
FAQ |
Blog |
Help! ]
Adaptive Learning versus Punishment in Ultimatum Bargaining Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics Abbink, Klaus
Bolton, Gary E.
Sadrieh, Abdolkarim
Tang, Fang-Fang
Additional information is available for the following
registered author(s):
No abstract is available for
this item.
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page . Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Games and Economic Behavior .
Volume (Year): 37 (2001)
Issue (Month): 1 (October)
Pages: 1-25
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract ),
plain text
(with abstract ),
BibTeX ,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:37:y:2001:i:1:p:1-25Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622836
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).
Keywords: Other versions of this item:
Cited by : (explanations , Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile , click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)James Andreoni & Emily Blanchard, 2006.
"Testing subgame perfection apart from fairness in ultimatum games ,"
Experimental Economics ,
Springer, vol. 9(4), pages 307-321, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Gary Bolton, 1998.
"Bargaining and Dilemma Games: From Laboratory Data Towards Theoretical Synthesis ,"
Experimental Economics ,
Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 257-281, December.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Gary E. Bolton & Jordi Brandts & Axel Ockenfels, 2000.
"Fair Procedures. Evidence from Games Involving Lotteries ,"
UFAE and IAE Working Papers
483.01, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Pamela Schmitt, 2004.
"On Perceptions of Fairness: The Role of Valuations, Outside Options, and Information in Ultimatum Bargaining Games ,"
Experimental Economics ,
Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 49-73, February.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
repec:att:wimass:1920215 is not listed on IDEAS
Giorgio Coricelli, 2002.
"Sequence Matters: an Experimental Study of the Effects of Experiencing Positive and Negative Reciprocity ,"
Department of Economics University of Siena
369, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
[Downloadable!]
Gary E. Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 2002.
"A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility ,"
Papers on Strategic Interaction
2002-29, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Urs Steiner Brandt, 2008.
"What can facilitate cooperation: Fairness, ineaulity aversion, punishment, norms or trust? ,"
Working Papers
80/08, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Environmental and Business Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Roger A. McCain, 2003.
"Specifying Agents: Probabilistic Equilibrium with Reciprocity ,"
Computing in Economics and Finance 2003
9, Society for Computational Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Uzi Segal & Joel Sobel, 1999.
"Tit for Tat: Foundations of Preferences for Reciprocity in Strategic Settings ,"
University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series
1999-10, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Uzi Segal & Joel Sobel, 1999.
"Tit for Tat: Foundations of Preferences for Reciprocity in Strategic Settings ,"
University of California at San Diego, Economics Working Paper Series
99-10, Department of Economics, UC San Diego.
[Downloadable!] Uzi Segal & Joel Sobel, 1999.
"Tit for Tat: Foundations of Preferences for Reciprocity in Strategic Settings ,"
UWO Department of Economics Working Papers
9905, University of Western Ontario, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!] Segal, Uzi & Sobel, Joel, 2007.
"Tit for tat: Foundations of preferences for reciprocity in strategic settings ,"
Journal of Economic Theory ,
Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 197-216, September.
[Downloadable!] (restricted) W. Güth & R. Ivanova-Stenzel & M. Königstein & M. Strobel, .
"Learning to Bid-An Experimental Study of Bid Function Adjustments in Auctions and Fair Division Games ,"
Sonderforschungsbereich 373
1999-70, Humboldt Universitaet Berlin.
Other versions: Gary E Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 1997.
"A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition ,"
Levine's Working Paper Archive
1889, David K. Levine.
[Downloadable!]
Olivier Armantier, 2006.
"Do Wealth Differences Affect Fairness Considerations? ,"
CIRANO Working Papers
2006s-13, CIRANO.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Brit Grosskopf, 2003.
"Reinforcement and Directional Learning in the Ultimatum Game with Responder Competition ,"
Experimental Economics ,
Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 141-158, October.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Abbink, K. & Sadrieh, A. & Zamir, S., 2002.
"Fairness, public good, and emotional aspects of punishment behavior ,"
Discussion Paper
38, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions: Olivier Armantier, 2001.
"Does Wealth Affect Fairness Considerations? ,"
Department of Economics Working Papers
01-05, Stony Brook University, Department of Economics.
[Downloadable!]
Shmuel Zamir, 2001.
"Rationality and Emotions in Ultimatum Bargaining ,"
Annales d'Economie et de Statistique ,
ADRES, issue 61, pages 02, Janvier-M.
[Downloadable!]
repec:att:wimass:19199934 is not listed on IDEAS
Hessel Oosterbeek & Randolph Sloof & Gijs van de Kuilen, 2004.
"Cultural differences in ultimatum game experiments: Evidence from a meta-analysis ,"
Experimental
0401003, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
Access and
download statistics Did you know? You can use IDEAS to provide links to papers and articles in your course syllabus.
This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics , College of Liberal Arts and Sciences , University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics .