This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Reference Points and Negative Reciprocity in Simple Sequential Games

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Brandts, Jordi
Sola, Carles
Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WFW-458NM4S-V/2/f088166186c7f0a26a93d81d9ae1747e
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Games and Economic Behavior.

Volume (Year): 36 (2001)
Issue (Month): 2 (August)
Pages: 138-157
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:36:y:2001:i:2:p:138-157

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622836

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 2009. "On Inequity Aversion A Reply to Binmore and Shaked," Discussion Papers 276, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich. [Downloadable!]
  2. Gary Charness & Matthew Rabin, 2004. "Expressed Preferences and Behavior in Experimental Games," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 07-04, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Jordi Brandts & Werner Gth & Andreas Stiehler, 2002. "I want YOU! An experiment studying the selection effect when assigning distributive power," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 521.02, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC). [Downloadable!]
  4. J. Atsu Amegashie, 2006. "A Psychological Game with Interdependent Preference Types," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Philipp C. Wichardt & Daniel Schunk & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2008. "Participation costs for responders can reduce rejection rates in ultimatum bargaining," IEW - Working Papers iewwp398, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - IEW. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  6. Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, 2009. "On Inequity Aversion A Reply to Binmore and Shaked," Discussion Papers 256, SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich. [Downloadable!]
  7. Gary Charness, 2004. "Attribution And Reciprocity In An Experimental Labor Market," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 08-04, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  8. Gary Charness & David Levine, 2003. "The Road to Hell: An Experimental Study of Intentions," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 14-03, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara. [Downloadable!]
  9. Giorgio Coricelli, 2002. "Sequence Matters: an Experimental Study of the Effects of Experiencing Positive and Negative Reciprocity," Department of Economics University of Siena 369, Department of Economics, University of Siena. [Downloadable!]
  10. Gary E. Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 2002. "A stress test of fairness measures in models of social utility," Papers on Strategic Interaction 2002-29, Max Planck Institute of Economics, Strategic Interaction Group. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  11. Amegashie, J., 2007. "Intentions, Insincerity, and Prosocial Behavior," Working Papers 2007-3, University of Guelph, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  12. Amegashie, J.A., 2006. "Guilt Aversion and Insincerity-Induced Disutility," Working Papers 2006-11, University of Guelph, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  13. López-Pérez, Raúl, 2006. "Emotions Enforce Fairness Norms (a Simple Model of Strong Reciprocity)," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2006/11, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History). [Downloadable!]
  14. Xiao, Erte & Bicchieri, Cristina, 2008. "When Equality Trumps Reciprocity: Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment," MPRA Paper 9375, University Library of Munich, Germany. [Downloadable!]
  15. Jordi Brandts & Gary Charness, 2003. "Do Market Conditions Affect Gift Exchange? Evidence from Experimental Markets," University of California at Santa Barbara, Economics Working Paper Series 13-03, Department of Economics, UC Santa Barbara. [Downloadable!]
  16. Maroš Servátka & Radovan Vadovic, 2008. "Does Fairness of the Outside Option Matter?," Working Papers in Economics 08/06, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  17. J. Atsu Amegashie, 2006. "Intentions and Social Interactions," CESifo Working Paper Series CESifo Working Paper No. , CESifo Group Munich. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  18. Martin Sandbu, 2008. "Axiomatic foundations for fairness-motivated preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 589-619, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  19. Ana Espinola-Arredondo & Felix Munoz-Garcia, 2009. "The importance of foregone options," Working Papers 2008-14, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University. [Downloadable!]
  20. Dhaene G. & Bouckaert J., 2007. "Sequential Reciprocity in Two-Player, Two-Stage Games: An Experimental Analysis," Working Papers 2007026, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Applied Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  21. Amegashie, J. Atsu, 2006. "Intentions, Insincerity, and Prosocial Behavior," MPRA Paper 3223, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 May 2007. [Downloadable!]
  22. Luca Stanca, 2008. "How to be kind? Outcomes versus Intentions as Determinants of Fairness," Working Papers 145, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Jul 2008. [Downloadable!]
  23. David Cooper & Carol Stockman, 2002. "Learning to Punish: Experimental Evidence from a Sequential Step-Level Public Goods Game," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 39-51, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  24. J. Brandts & W. Güth & A. Stiehler, . "I want You! An experiment studying the selection effect when assigning distributive power," Sonderforschungsbereich 373 2002-51, Humboldt Universitaet Berlin.
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.