IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v35y2010i10p4042-4052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas

Author

Listed:
  • Pihl, Erik
  • Heyne, Stefan
  • Thunman, Henrik
  • Johnsson, Filip

Abstract

Integration/co-firing with existing fossil fuel plants could give near term highly efficient and low cost power production from biomass. This paper presents a techno-economical analysis on options for integrating biomass thermal conversion (optimized for local resources ∼50 MWth) with existing CCGT (combined cycle gas turbine) power plants (800–1400 MWth). Options include hybrid combined cycles (HCC), indirect gasification of biomass and simple cycle biomass steam plants which are simulated using the software Ebsilon Professional and Aspen Plus. Levelized cost of electricity (LCoE) is calculated with cost functions derived from power plant data. Results show that the integrated HCC configurations (fully-fired) show a significantly higher efficiency (40–41%, LHV (lower heating value)) than a stand-alone steam plant (35.5%); roughly half of the efficiency (2.4% points) is due to more efficient fuel drying. Because of higher investment costs, HCC options have cost advantages over stand-alone options at high biomass fuel prices (>25 EUR/MWh) or low discount rates (<5%). Gasification options show even higher efficiency (46–50%), and the lowest LCoE for the options studied for fuel costs exceeding 10 EUR/MWh. It can be concluded that clear efficiency improvements and possible cost reductions can be reached by integration of biomass with CCGT power plants compared to stand-alone plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Pihl, Erik & Heyne, Stefan & Thunman, Henrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2010. "Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4042-4052.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:10:p:4042-4052
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544210003221
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2010.06.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ericsson, Karin, 2007. "Co-firing—A strategy for bioenergy in Poland?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1838-1847.
    2. Junginger, Martin & de Visser, Erika & Hjort-Gregersen, Kurt & Koornneef, Joris & Raven, Rob & Faaij, Andre & Turkenburg, Wim, 2006. "Technological learning in bioenergy systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(18), pages 4024-4041, December.
    3. Korobitsyn, M.A & Jellema, P & Hirs, G.G, 1999. "Possibilities for gas turbine and waste incinerator integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 24(9), pages 783-793.
    4. Rodrigues, Monica & Walter, Arnaldo & Faaij, André, 2003. "Co-firing of natural gas and Biomass gas in biomass integrated gasification/combined cycle systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(11), pages 1115-1131.
    5. Fiaschi, Daniele & Carta, Riccardo, 2007. "CO2 abatement by co-firing of natural gas and biomass-derived gas in a gas turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 549-567.
    6. Hansson, Julia & Berndes, Gran & Johnsson, Filip & Kjrstad, Jan, 2009. "Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation--An assessment of the potential in EU27," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1444-1455, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jiangjiang & Mao, Tianzhi & Sui, Jun & Jin, Hongguang, 2015. "Modeling and performance analysis of CCHP (combined cooling, heating and power) system based on co-firing of natural gas and biomass gasification gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 801-815.
    2. Wang, Shucheng & Chen, Xiaoxu & Wei, Bing & Fu, Zhongguang & Li, Hongwei & Qin, Mei, 2023. "Thermodynamic analysis of a net zero emission system with CCHP and green DME production by integrating biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    3. Shafie, S.M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2014. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 401-410.
    4. Pihl, Erik & Kushnir, Duncan & Sandén, Björn & Johnsson, Filip, 2012. "Material constraints for concentrating solar thermal power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 944-954.
    5. Sanz-Bermejo, Javier & Muñoz-Antón, Javier & Gonzalez-Aguilar, José & Romero, Manuel, 2014. "Optimal integration of a solid-oxide electrolyser cell into a direct steam generation solar tower plant for zero-emission hydrogen production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 238-247.
    6. Sennai Mesfun & Jan-Olof Anderson & Kentaro Umeki & Andrea Toffolo, 2016. "Integrated SNG Production in a Typical Nordic Sawmill," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Heyne, Stefan & Harvey, Simon, 2013. "Assessment of the energy and economic performance of second generation biofuel production processes using energy market scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 203-212.
    8. Do, Truong Xuan & Lim, Young-il & Yeo, Heejung & Lee, Uen-do & Choi, Young-tai & Song, Jae-hun, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of power plant via circulating fluidized-bed gasification from woodchips," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 547-560.
    9. Alsaleh, Mohd & Abdul-Rahim, A.S., 2018. "Determinants of cost efficiency of bioenergy industry: Evidence from EU28 countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 746-762.
    10. Li, C.Y. & Deethayat, T. & Wu, J.Y. & Kiatsiriroat, T. & Wang, R.Z., 2018. "Simulation and evaluation of a biomass gasification-based combined cooling, heating, and power system integrated with an organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 238-255.
    11. Tazi, Nacef & Safaei, Fatemeh & Hnaien, Faicel, 2022. "Assessment of the levelized cost of energy using a stochastic model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PB).
    12. Wang, Gang & Dong, Boyi & Chen, Zeshao, 2021. "Design and behaviour estimate of a novel concentrated solar-driven power and desalination system using S–CO2 Brayton cycle and MSF technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 555-564.
    13. Vitaly Sergeev & Irina Anikina & Konstantin Kalmykov, 2021. "Using Heat Pumps to Improve the Efficiency of Combined-Cycle Gas Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, May.
    14. Holmgren, Kristina M. & Berntsson, Thore & Andersson, Eva & Rydberg, Tomas, 2012. "System aspects of biomass gasification with methanol synthesis – Process concepts and energy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 817-828.
    15. González, Arnau & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Puig, Rita & Navarro, Pere, 2015. "Review of micro- and small-scale technologies to produce electricity and heat from Mediterranean forests׳ wood chips," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 143-155.
    16. Lund, Rasmus & Mathiesen, Brian Vad, 2015. "Large combined heat and power plants in sustainable energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 389-395.
    17. Alsaleh, Mohd & Abdul-Rahim, A.S. & Mohd-Shahwahid, H.O., 2017. "Determinants of technical efficiency in the bioenergy industry in the EU28 region," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1331-1349.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dias, Marina O.S. & Modesto, Marcelo & Ensinas, Adriano V. & Nebra, Silvia A. & Filho, Rubens Maciel & Rossell, Carlos E.V., 2011. "Improving bioethanol production from sugarcane: evaluation of distillation, thermal integration and cogeneration systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 3691-3703.
    2. Royo, Javier & Sebastián, Fernando & García-Galindo, Daniel & Gómez, Maider & Díaz, Maryori, 2012. "Large-scale analysis of GHG (greenhouse gas) reduction by means of biomass co-firing at country-scale: Application to the Spanish case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 255-267.
    3. Hoefnagels, Ric & Banse, Martin & Dornburg, Veronika & Faaij, André, 2013. "Macro-economic impact of large-scale deployment of biomass resources for energy and materials on a national level—A combined approach for the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 727-744.
    4. Perry, Simon & Klemeš, Jiří & Bulatov, Igor, 2008. "Integrating waste and renewable energy to reduce the carbon footprint of locally integrated energy sectors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(10), pages 1489-1497.
    5. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2013. "Economic factors influencing potential use of cellulosic crop residues for electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-91.
    6. Audrey Laude & Christian Jonen, 2011. "Biomass and CCS: The influence of the learning effect," Working Papers halshs-00829779, HAL.
    7. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    8. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.
    9. Moiseyev, Alexander & Solberg, Birger & Kallio, A. Maarit I., 2014. "The impact of subsidies and carbon pricing on the wood biomass use for energy in the EU," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 161-167.
    10. Delivand, Mitra Kami & Barz, Mirko & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Sajjakulnukit, Boonrod, 2011. "Economic feasibility assessment of rice straw utilization for electricity generating through combustion in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3651-3658.
    11. Roni, Md.S. & Eksioglu, Sandra D. & Searcy, Erin & Jha, Krishna, 2014. "A supply chain network design model for biomass co-firing in coal-fired power plants," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 115-134.
    12. Amirhamzeh Farajollahi & Seyed Amirhossein Hejazirad & Mohsen Rostami, 2022. "Thermodynamic modeling of a power and hydrogen generation system driven by municipal solid waste gasification," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 5887-5916, April.
    13. Al-Kassir, A. & Gañán-Gómez, J. & Mohamad, A.A. & Cuerda-Correa, E.M., 2010. "A study of energy production from cork residues: Sawdust, sandpaper dust and triturated wood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 382-386.
    14. Escudero, Marcos & Jiménez, Ángel & González, Celina & López, Ignacio, 2013. "Quantitative analysis of potential power production and environmental benefits of Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles in the European Union," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 63-75.
    15. del Río, Pablo & Peñasco, Cristina & Mir-Artigues, Pere, 2018. "An overview of drivers and barriers to concentrated solar power in the European Union," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1019-1029.
    16. Melts, Indrek & Heinsoo, Katrin & Nurk, Liina & Pärn, Linnar, 2013. "Comparison of two different bioenergy production options from late harvested biomass of Estonian semi-natural grasslands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 6-12.
    17. Jóźwiak, Piotr & Hercog, Jarosław & Kiedrzyńska, Aleksandra & Badyda, Krzysztof, 2019. "CFD analysis of natural gas substitution with syngas in the industrial furnaces," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 593-602.
    18. Holtermann, Timm & Madlener, Reinhard, 2011. "Assessment of the technological development and economic potential of photobioreactors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1906-1919, May.
    19. Yeh, Sonia & Rubin, Edward S., 2012. "A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 762-771.
    20. Xinhua Shen & Raghava R. Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2015. "The Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Power Generation from Lignocellulosic Biomass," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:35:y:2010:i:10:p:4042-4052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.