IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v48y2012i1p255-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large-scale analysis of GHG (greenhouse gas) reduction by means of biomass co-firing at country-scale: Application to the Spanish case

Author

Listed:
  • Royo, Javier
  • Sebastián, Fernando
  • García-Galindo, Daniel
  • Gómez, Maider
  • Díaz, Maryori

Abstract

The knowledge of the potentially achievable reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by biomass co-firing is a powerful tool in supporting decision makers when it comes to undertaking energy planning. The main goal of this work was to develop a methodology by which significant biomass co-firing potentials and subsequent reduced GHG emissions, could be obtained at large territories. This methodology has been applied to Spain. It has been found that agricultural and forestry residual biomass feedstocks, available within 100 km of coal-fired power plants (CPP), currently total up to 75.8 PJth/yr. If energy crop feedstocks are included, this quantity increases up to 91.1 PJth/yr. However, the utilisation of biomass in CPPs is constrained by technical limitations. Taking into account these restrictions, biomass could be co-fired to generate up to 7.7% of electricity produced in CPPs (42.1 PJth/yr of biomass). A life cycle assessment has been performed to all the processes involved. The results indicate that up to 87 tCO2eq can be reduced by utilising 1 TJth of biomass replacing coal. The combination of these figures points out that biomass co-firing could contribute to mitigating 3.4 MtCO2eq in Spain annually. This value equates to almost 1% of its total GHG emissions.

Suggested Citation

  • Royo, Javier & Sebastián, Fernando & García-Galindo, Daniel & Gómez, Maider & Díaz, Maryori, 2012. "Large-scale analysis of GHG (greenhouse gas) reduction by means of biomass co-firing at country-scale: Application to the Spanish case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 255-267.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:48:y:2012:i:1:p:255-267
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544212004975
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fahd, S. & Fiorentino, G. & Mellino, S. & Ulgiati, S., 2012. "Cropping bioenergy and biomaterials in marginal land: The added value of the biorefinery concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 79-93.
    2. Sebastián, F. & Royo, J. & Gómez, M., 2011. "Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2029-2037.
    3. Ericsson, Karin, 2007. "Co-firing—A strategy for bioenergy in Poland?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1838-1847.
    4. Sultana, Arifa & Kumar, Amit, 2011. "Development of energy and emission parameters for densified form of lignocellulosic biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2716-2732.
    5. Kazagic, A. & Smajevic, I., 2009. "Synergy effects of co-firing wooden biomass with Bosnian coal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 699-707.
    6. Buonocore, Elvira & Franzese, Pier Paolo & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2012. "Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: A life cycle assessment perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 69-78.
    7. Cherubini, Francesco, 2010. "GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1565-1573.
    8. Weisser, Daniel, 2007. "A guide to life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from electric supply technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1543-1559.
    9. McManus, M.C., 2010. "Life cycle impacts of waste wood biomass heating systems: A case study of three UK based systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4064-4070.
    10. Hansson, Julia & Berndes, Gran & Johnsson, Filip & Kjrstad, Jan, 2009. "Co-firing biomass with coal for electricity generation--An assessment of the potential in EU27," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1444-1455, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2013. "Economic factors influencing potential use of cellulosic crop residues for electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-91.
    2. Akhil Kadiyala & Raghava Kommalapati & Ziaul Huque, 2016. "Evaluation of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Biomass Feedstock Electricity Generation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Aviso, K.B. & Sy, C.L. & Tan, R.R. & Ubando, A.T., 2020. "Fuzzy optimization of carbon management networks based on direct and indirect biomass co-firing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    4. Murphy, Fionnuala & Sosa, Amanda & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-energy systems in Ireland modelled with biomass supply chain optimisation based on greenhouse gas emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1040-1055.
    5. Wu, Juanjuan & Zhang, Jian & Yi, Weiming & Cai, Hongzhen & Su, Zhanpeng & Li, Yang, 2021. "Economic analysis of different straw supply modes in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Dzikuć, Maciej & Piwowar, Arkadiusz, 2016. "Ecological and economic aspects of electric energy production using the biomass co-firing method: The case of Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 856-862.
    7. Hu, Ming-Che & Huang, An-Lei & Wen, Tzai-Hung, 2013. "GIS-based biomass resource utilization for rice straw cofiring in the Taiwanese power market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 354-360.
    8. Luan, Chao & You, Changfu & Zhang, Dongke, 2014. "Composition and sintering characteristics of ashes from co-firing of coal and biomass in a laboratory-scale drop tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 562-570.
    9. Agudelo, Andrés & Valero, Antonio & Usón, Sergio, 2013. "The fossil trace of CO2 emissions in multi-fuel energy systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 236-246.
    10. Muench, Stefan & Guenther, Edeltraud, 2013. "A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-273.
    11. Agar, D. & Gil, J. & Sanchez, D. & Echeverria, I. & Wihersaari, M., 2015. "Torrefied versus conventional pellet production – A comparative study on energy and emission balance based on pilot-plant data and EU sustainability criteria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 621-630.
    12. Paredes-Sánchez, José P. & García-Elcoro, Víctor E. & Rosillo-Calle, Frank & Xiberta-Bernat, Jorge, 2016. "Assessment of forest bioenergy potential in a coal-producing area in Asturias (Spain) and recommendations for setting up a Biomass Logistic Centre (BLC)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 133-141.
    13. Thakur, Amit & Canter, Christina E. & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-253.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muench, Stefan & Guenther, Edeltraud, 2013. "A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 257-273.
    2. Sebastián, F. & Royo, J. & Gómez, M., 2011. "Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2029-2037.
    3. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2013. "Economic factors influencing potential use of cellulosic crop residues for electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-91.
    4. Melts, Indrek & Heinsoo, Katrin & Nurk, Liina & Pärn, Linnar, 2013. "Comparison of two different bioenergy production options from late harvested biomass of Estonian semi-natural grasslands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 6-12.
    5. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.
    6. Murphy, Fionnuala & Sosa, Amanda & McDonnell, Kevin & Devlin, Ger, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of biomass-to-energy systems in Ireland modelled with biomass supply chain optimisation based on greenhouse gas emission reduction," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1040-1055.
    7. Luan, Chao & You, Changfu & Zhang, Dongke, 2014. "Composition and sintering characteristics of ashes from co-firing of coal and biomass in a laboratory-scale drop tube furnace," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 562-570.
    8. Varun, & Prakash, Ravi & Bhat, I.K., 2012. "Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions estimation for small hydropower schemes in India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 498-508.
    9. Oliveira, M. & Zucaro, A. & Santagata, R. & Ulgiati, S., 2022. "Environmental assessment of milk production from local to regional scales," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 463(C).
    10. Portugal Pereira, Joana & Troncoso Parady, Giancarlos & Castro Dominguez, Bernardo, 2014. "Japan's energy conundrum: Post-Fukushima scenarios from a life cycle perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 104-115.
    11. Pierobon, Francesca & Zanetti, Michela & Grigolato, Stefano & Sgarbossa, Andrea & Anfodillo, Tommaso & Cavalli, Raffaele, 2015. "Life cycle environmental impact of firewood production – A case study in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 185-195.
    12. Murphy, Fionnuala & Devlin, Ger & McDonnell, Kevin, 2013. "Miscanthus production and processing in Ireland: An analysis of energy requirements and environmental impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 412-420.
    13. Pihl, Erik & Heyne, Stefan & Thunman, Henrik & Johnsson, Filip, 2010. "Highly efficient electricity generation from biomass by integration and hybridization with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) plants for natural gas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4042-4052.
    14. Bartzas, Georgios & Komnitsas, Kostas, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of ferronickel production in Greece," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 105(PA), pages 113-122.
    15. Shafie, S.M. & Masjuki, H.H. & Mahlia, T.M.I., 2014. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 401-410.
    16. Yang, Qing & Han, Fei & Chen, Yingquan & Yang, Haiping & Chen, Hanping, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emissions of a biomass-based pyrolysis plant in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1580-1590.
    17. Yi, Ji Hyun & Ko, Woong & Park, Jong-Keun & Park, Hyeongon, 2018. "Impact of carbon emission constraint on design of small scale multi-energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 792-808.
    18. Iriarte, Alfredo & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2012. "Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 263-273.
    19. Shafie, S.M. & Mahlia, T.M.I. & Masjuki, H.H., 2013. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 284-294.
    20. Hoefnagels, Ric & Banse, Martin & Dornburg, Veronika & Faaij, André, 2013. "Macro-economic impact of large-scale deployment of biomass resources for energy and materials on a national level—A combined approach for the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 727-744.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:48:y:2012:i:1:p:255-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.