IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v239y2022ipbs0360544221023653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An option pricing model based on a renewable energy price index

Author

Listed:
  • Xue, Jian
  • Ding, Jing
  • Zhao, Laijun
  • Zhu, Di
  • Li, Lei

Abstract

As a result of rapid socioeconomic development, the world is facing the simultaneous challenges of environmental pollution and resource depletion. How to promote the development of renewable, non-polluting energy is therefore essential. This could be achieved by supporting the rapid growth of a renewable energy financial market that includes various derivatives. To support such an effort, we designed an option contract model based on a renewable energy price index using data from the current development status of energy financial markets. To construct a renewable energy price index, we chose the daily electricity price value from the Nord Pool exchange system from January 2017 to August 2019. Next, we used an auto-regressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model to predict this price index and estimate the model's parameters. We then used the true value and the predicted value for Nord Pool to perform Monte Carlo simulation pricing for electricity price index options in September 2019, and calculated the relative error. We found that the option contract's design for the renewable energy price index was designed reasonably. The ARIMA model predicted the renewable electricity price index accurately, and the Monte Carlo simulation pricing was reasonable and practical. The option contract for renewable energy price index can effectively explore the energy financial markets varieties and promote the global development of renewable energy sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Xue, Jian & Ding, Jing & Zhao, Laijun & Zhu, Di & Li, Lei, 2022. "An option pricing model based on a renewable energy price index," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221023653
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221023653
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicky Fasen‐Hartmann & Sebastian Kimmig, 2020. "Robust estimation of stationary continuous‐time arma models via indirect inference," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 620-651, September.
    2. Ma Yonghong & Wu Zhiyong & Ai Mingye & Wang Wei, 2016. "The Construction and Application of a New Exchange Rate Forecast Model Combining ARIMA with a Chaotic BP Algorithm," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(6), pages 1481-1495, June.
    3. L.A. Abbas-Turki & S. Vialle & Bernard Lapeyre & P. Mercier, 2014. "Pricing derivatives on graphics processing units using Monte Carlo simulation," Post-Print hal-01667067, HAL.
    4. C. J. Corrado & Tie Su, 1997. "Implied volatility skews and stock return skewness and kurtosis implied by stock option prices," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 73-85, March.
    5. Niu, Hongli & Wang, Jun, 2017. "Return volatility duration analysis of NYMEX energy futures and spot," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 837-849.
    6. Šaltytė Benth, Jūratė & Benth, Fred Espen, 2012. "A critical view on temperature modelling for application in weather derivatives markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 592-602.
    7. Boyle, Phelim P., 1977. "Options: A Monte Carlo approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 323-338, May.
    8. Jyothi Unnikrishnan & Kodakanallur Krishnaswamy Suresh, 2016. "Modelling the Impact of Government Policies on Import on Domestic Price of Indian Gold Using ARIMA Intervention Method," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-6, September.
    9. Allen, David E. & Gao, Jiti & McAleer, Michael, 2009. "Modelling and managing financial risk: An overview," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(8), pages 2521-2524.
    10. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    11. Cox, John C. & Ross, Stephen A. & Rubinstein, Mark, 1979. "Option pricing: A simplified approach," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 229-263, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahdi Asadi & Iman Larki & Mohammad Mahdi Forootan & Rouhollah Ahmadi & Meisam Farajollahi, 2023. "Long-Term Scenario Analysis of Electricity Supply and Demand in Iran: Time Series Analysis, Renewable Electricity Development, Energy Efficiency and Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Ashok Bhansali & Namala Narasimhulu & Rocío Pérez de Prado & Parameshachari Bidare Divakarachari & Dayanand Lal Narayan, 2023. "A Review on Sustainable Energy Sources Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Anatolijs Borodinecs & Kristina Lebedeva & Natalja Sidenko & Aleksejs Prozuments, 2022. "Enhancement of Chiller Performance by Water Distribution on the Adiabatic Cooling Pad’s Mesh Surface," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-19, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pringles, Rolando & Olsina, Fernando & Penizzotto, Franco, 2020. "Valuation of defer and relocation options in photovoltaic generation investments by a stochastic simulation-based method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 846-864.
    2. Collan, Mikael, 2008. "New Method for Real Option Valuation Using Fuzzy Numbers," Working Papers 466, IAMSR, Åbo Akademi.
    3. Grosen, Anders & Lochte Jorgensen, Peter, 2000. "Fair valuation of life insurance liabilities: The impact of interest rate guarantees, surrender options, and bonus policies," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 37-57, February.
    4. Yongxin Yang & Yu Zheng & Timothy M. Hospedales, 2016. "Gated Neural Networks for Option Pricing: Rationality by Design," Papers 1609.07472, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    5. Kostrova, Alisa & Britz, Wolfgang & Djanibekov, Utkur & Finger, Robert, 2016. "Monte-Carlo Simulation and Stochastic Programming in Real Options Valuation: the Case of Perennial Energy Crop Cultivation," Discussion Papers 250253, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    6. Engstrom, Malin & Norden, Lars, 2000. "The early exercise premium in American put option prices," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3-4), pages 461-479, December.
    7. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    8. Jianhui Li & Sebastian A. Gehricke & Jin E. Zhang, 2019. "How do US options traders “smirk” on China? Evidence from FXI options," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(11), pages 1450-1470, November.
    9. In oon Kim & Bong-Gyu Jang & Kyeong Tae Kim, 2013. "A simple iterative method for the valuation of American options," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 885-895, May.
    10. Suresh M. Sundaresan, 2000. "Continuous‐Time Methods in Finance: A Review and an Assessment," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1569-1622, August.
    11. Kenji Hamatani & Masao Fukushima, 2011. "Pricing American options with uncertain volatility through stochastic linear complementarity models," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 263-286, October.
    12. Chen, Ding & Härkönen, Hannu J. & Newton, David P., 2014. "Advancing the universality of quadrature methods to any underlying process for option pricing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(3), pages 600-612.
    13. Liu, Qiang & Guo, Shuxin, 2020. "An excellent approximation for the m out of n day provision," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Jan Vlachý, 2008. "Flexibility Value of Czech Power-Generation," Ekonomika a Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2008(2).
    15. Nelson Areal & Artur Rodrigues & Manuel Armada, 2008. "On improving the least squares Monte Carlo option valuation method," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151, March.
    16. Luigi Ranieri & Giorgio Mossa & Roberta Pellegrino & Salvatore Digiesi, 2018. "Energy Recovery from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: A Real Options-Based Facility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Kozlova, Mariia, 2017. "Real option valuation in renewable energy literature: Research focus, trends and design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 180-196.
    18. Katarzyna Toporek, 2012. "Simple is better. Empirical comparison of American option valuation methods," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 29.
    19. Morgan, Horatio M. & Ngwenyama, Ojelanki, 2015. "Real options, learning cost and timing software upgrades: Towards an integrative model for enterprise software upgrade decision analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 211-223.
    20. Joost Buurman & Stephen Zhang & Vladan Babovic, 2009. "Reducing Risk Through Real Options in Systems Design: The Case of Architecting a Maritime Domain Protection System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 366-379, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221023653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.