IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v232y2021ics0360544221012767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Yongjun
  • Chen, Shaoxu
  • Li, Xusheng
  • Jiang, Bo
  • Zhao, Joe RuHe
  • Nong, Guangzai

Abstract

Energy demands of a cassava starch plant (CSP) were investigated and modeled. Four combined heat and power (CHP) systems using biogas were evaluated and compared, including energy self-support, economic feasibility and environmental impacts. Assessment results indicated that CHP system with reciprocating internal-combustion engine (ICE-CHP) and micro turbine (MT-CHP) can meet all the energy demands of the CSP. ICE-CHP technologies obtained the best profit, followed by MT-CHP, B/T-CHP and common system. The four systems are economically feasible, ICE-CHP showed better economy than MT-CHP system. Both ICE-CHP and MT-CHP systems have the lowest environmental impacts comparing to other CHP systems in view of emissions. ICE-CHP should be suggested firstly considering the short payback period (4.57 year), the lowest environmental impacts and 100% of energy self-support. Boiler/Turbines CHP (B/T-CHP) will not be adopted as it is unable to supply all the electricity needs of the CSP. Plant availability shows the greatest impact on the payback period. If the investment cost of MT-CHP decreases by more than 12.7%, MT-CHP would have better economy than ICE-CHP. The results are helpful for the management of CSP to select the suitable CHP technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:232:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221012767
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221012767
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kozłowski, Kamil & Pietrzykowski, Maciej & Czekała, Wojciech & Dach, Jacek & Kowalczyk-Juśko, Alina & Jóźwiakowski, Krzysztof & Brzoski, Michał, 2019. "Energetic and economic analysis of biogas plant with using the dairy industry waste," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1023-1031.
    2. Basrawi, Mohamad Firdaus Bin & Yamada, Takanobu & Nakanishi, Kimio & Katsumata, Hideaki, 2012. "Analysis of the performances of biogas-fuelled micro gas turbine cogeneration systems (MGT-CGSs) in middle- and small-scale sewage treatment plants: Comparison of performances and optimization of MGTs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 291-304.
    3. Brizi, Federico & Silveira, Jose Luz & Desideri, Umberto & Reis, Joaquim Antonio dos & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz, 2014. "Energetic and economic analysis of a Brazilian compact cogeneration system: Comparison between natural gas and biogas," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 193-211.
    4. Goulding, D. & Power, N., 2013. "Which is the preferable biogas utilisation technology for anaerobic digestion of agricultural crops in Ireland: Biogas to CHP or biomethane as a transport fuel?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 121-131.
    5. Tran, Thierry & Da, Guillaume & Moreno-Santander, Martín Alonso & Vélez-Hernández, Gustavo Adolfo & Giraldo-Toro, Andrès & Piyachomkwan, Kuakoon & Sriroth, Klanarong & Dufour, Dominique, 2015. "A comparison of energy use, water use and carbon footprint of cassava starch production in Thailand, Vietnam and Colombia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-40.
    6. MosayebNezhad, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Lanzini, A. & Misul, D. & Santarelli, M., 2019. "Technology review and thermodynamic performance study of a biogas-fed micro humid air turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 407-418.
    7. Mueller, Steffen, 2007. "Manure's allure: Variation of the financial, environmental, and economic benefits from combined heat and power systems integrated with anaerobic digesters at hog farms across geographic and economic r," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 248-256.
    8. Murphy, J. D. & McKeogh, E. & Kiely, G., 2004. "Technical/economic/environmental analysis of biogas utilisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(4), pages 407-427, April.
    9. Anyanwu, C.N. & Ibeto, C.N. & Ezeoha, S.L. & Ogbuagu, N.J., 2015. "Sustainability of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) as industrial feedstock, energy and food crop in Nigeria," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 745-752.
    10. Lantz, Mikael, 2012. "The economic performance of combined heat and power from biogas produced from manure in Sweden – A comparison of different CHP technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 502-511.
    11. Teymoori Hamzehkolaei, Fatemeh & Amjady, Nima, 2018. "A techno-economic assessment for replacement of conventional fossil fuel based technologies in animal farms with biogas fueled CHP units," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 602-614.
    12. Bakhtyar, B. & Fudholi, A. & Hassan, Kabir & Azam, M. & Lim, C.H. & Chan, N.W. & Sopian, K., 2017. "Review of CO2 price in Europe using feed-in tariff rates," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 685-691.
    13. Sánchez, Antonio Santos & Silva, Yuri Lopes & Kalid, Ricardo Araújo & Cohim, Eduardo & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2017. "Waste bio-refineries for the cassava starch industry: New trends and review of alternatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1265-1275.
    14. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    15. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    16. Cozzolino, Raffaello & Lombardi, Lidia & Tribioli, Laura, 2017. "Use of biogas from biowaste in a solid oxide fuel cell stack: Application to an off-grid power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 781-791.
    17. Mao, Chunlan & Feng, Yongzhong & Wang, Xiaojiao & Ren, Guangxin, 2015. "Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 540-555.
    18. Salomón, Marianne & Savola, Tuula & Martin, Andrew & Fogelholm, Carl-Johan & Fransson, Torsten, 2011. "Small-scale biomass CHP plants in Sweden and Finland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4451-4465.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G.S. Chebotareva & A.A. Dvinayninov, 2021. "An Economic Alternative to Replacing Centralized Gas Supply with Autonomous Biogas Facilities in Russian Cities," Journal of Applied Economic Research, Graduate School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University, vol. 20(3), pages 582-612.
    2. Josipa Pavičić & Karolina Novak Mavar & Vladislav Brkić & Katarina Simon, 2022. "Biogas and Biomethane Production and Usage: Technology Development, Advantages and Challenges in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.
    3. Chen, Wen-Lih & Currao, Gaetano & Li, Yueh-Heng & Kao, Chien-Chun, 2023. "Employing Taguchi method to optimize the performance of a microscale combined heat and power system with Stirling engine and thermophotovoltaic array," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    4. Pablo Emilio Escamilla-García & Ana Lilia Coria-Páez & Francisco Pérez-Soto & Francisco Gutiérrez-Galicia & Carolina Caire & Blanca L. Martínez-Vargas, 2023. "Financial and Technical Evaluation of Energy Production by Biological and Thermal Treatments of MSW in Mexico City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Yang, Wenjun & Guo, Jia & Vartosh, Aris, 2022. "Optimal economic-emission planning of multi-energy systems integrated electric vehicles with modified group search optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    6. Calise, Francesco & Cappiello, Francesco Liberato & Cimmino, Luca & Dentice d’Accadia, Massimo & Vicidomini, Maria, 2023. "Dynamic analysis and investigation of the thermal transient effects in a CSTR reactor producing biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Herbes, Carsten & Halbherr, Verena & Braun, Lorenz, 2018. "Factors influencing prices for heat from biogas plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 308-318.
    2. Sunhee Kim & Taehong Sung & Kyung Chun Kim, 2017. "Thermodynamic Performance Analysis of a Biogas-Fuelled Micro-Gas Turbine with a Bottoming Organic Rankine Cycle for Sewage Sludge and Food Waste Treatment Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, February.
    3. Lauer, Markus & Hansen, Jason K. & Lamers, Patrick & Thrän, Daniela, 2018. "Making money from waste: The economic viability of producing biogas and biomethane in the Idaho dairy industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 621-636.
    4. Ozoegwu, C.G. & Eze, C. & Onwosi, C.O. & Mgbemene, C.A. & Ozor, P.A., 2017. "Biomass and bioenergy potential of cassava waste in Nigeria: Estimations based partly on rural-level garri processing case studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 625-638.
    5. Herz, Gregor & Reichelt, Erik & Jahn, Matthias, 2017. "Design and evaluation of a Fischer-Tropsch process for the production of waxes from biogas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 370-381.
    6. Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska & Stanisław Kruczyński & Wojciech Kamela, 2019. "Evaluation of Using Biogas to Supply the Dual Fuel Diesel Engine of an Agricultural Tractor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Daniela Szymańska & Aleksandra Lewandowska, 2015. "Biogas Power Plants in Poland—Structure, Capacity, and Spatial Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Strzalka, Rafal & Schneider, Dietrich & Eicker, Ursula, 2017. "Current status of bioenergy technologies in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 801-820.
    9. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Chinese, D. & Patrizio, P. & Nardin, G., 2014. "Effects of changes in Italian bioenergy promotion schemes for agricultural biogas projects: Insights from a regional optimization model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 189-205.
    11. Sánchez, Antonio Santos & Silva, Yuri Lopes & Kalid, Ricardo Araújo & Cohim, Eduardo & Torres, Ednildo Andrade, 2017. "Waste bio-refineries for the cassava starch industry: New trends and review of alternatives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1265-1275.
    12. Gazda, Wiesław & Stanek, Wojciech, 2016. "Energy and environmental assessment of integrated biogas trigeneration and photovoltaic plant as more sustainable industrial system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 138-149.
    13. Ramírez-Arpide, Félix Rafael & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro & Gallegos-Vázquez, Clemente & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio, 2019. "Bioenergy production from nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure on a farm-scale level: Challenges for its economic feasibility in Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 383-392.
    14. Achinas, Spyridon & Willem Euverink, Gerrit Jan, 2020. "Rambling facets of manure-based biogas production in Europe: A briefing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Maghanaki, M. Mohammadi & Ghobadian, B. & Najafi, G. & Galogah, R. Janzadeh, 2013. "Potential of biogas production in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 702-714.
    16. Lombardi, Lidia & Francini, Giovanni, 2020. "Techno-economic and environmental assessment of the main biogas upgrading technologies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 440-458.
    17. Sean O’Connor & Ehiaze Ehimen & Suresh C. Pillai & Gary Lyons & John Bartlett, 2020. "Economic and Environmental Analysis of Small-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plants on Irish Dairy Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, February.
    18. Gil-Carrera, Laura & Browne, James D. & Kilgallon, Ian & Murphy, Jerry D., 2019. "Feasibility study of an off-grid biomethane mobile solution for agri-waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 471-481.
    19. A Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & ElSergany, Moetaz & Anuar, Syed & Jorat, M. Ehsan & Yaacob, H. & Ahsan, Amimul & Imteaz, Monzur A. & Arifuzzaman,, 2020. "Recent advances on palm oil mill effluent (POME) pretreatment and anaerobic reactor for sustainable biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Kang, Jun Young & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop & Hur, Kwang Beom, 2014. "Comparative economic analysis of gas turbine-based power generation and combined heat and power systems using biogas fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 309-318.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:232:y:2021:i:c:s0360544221012767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.