IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v100y2015icp31-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of energy use, water use and carbon footprint of cassava starch production in Thailand, Vietnam and Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Tran, Thierry
  • Da, Guillaume
  • Moreno-Santander, Martín Alonso
  • Vélez-Hernández, Gustavo Adolfo
  • Giraldo-Toro, Andrès
  • Piyachomkwan, Kuakoon
  • Sriroth, Klanarong
  • Dufour, Dominique

Abstract

Energy use, water use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were assessed for the transformation of cassava roots into starch by two small-scale (ST1, ST2: 1–2t starch per day) and one large-scale (VLT: 100–200t starch per day) technologies. The goal of the study was to identify hotspots of energy use and GHG emissions, as well as sustainable practices, with a view to uncover opportunities to improve the environmental performance of cassava starch production. VLT required 2527MJ/t starch, mainly (77%) from biogas used to dry starch, but was the most efficient in terms of water use (10m3/t starch) due to the practice of water recycling between unit operations. ST1 and ST2 were similar in terms of electricity use (212MJ/t starch), and were able to rely on solar energy to dry starch, due to the small volumes of production. In contrast, water use varied from 21 to 62m3/t starch due to differences in the design of the rasping and starch recovery (extraction) operations. GHG emissions were 149, 93 and 105kg CO2eq/t starch for VLT, ST1 and ST2 respectively. For ST1 and ST2, methane emissions from untreated wastewater were the main contribution to GHG emissions. For VLT, methane was captured to produce biogas and to dry starch, and the main contribution to GHG emissions was the use of non-renewable grid electricity. Biogas technology was adopted in the past 12 years in the case of VLT. Previously fuel oil was used instead of biogas, which resulted in GHG emissions of 539kg CO2eq/t starch. VLT used markedly more electricity than ST1 and ST2, which was necessary to ensure the high output and consistent starch quality. Strategies to reduce the impacts of cassava starch production could focus on (1) increasing the energy efficiency of the drying operation, in order to make more biogas available for other uses such as production of renewable electricity; (2) improving the design of some unit operations with regards to water and energy efficiency; and (3) promoting the transfer and adoption of water recycling practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Tran, Thierry & Da, Guillaume & Moreno-Santander, Martín Alonso & Vélez-Hernández, Gustavo Adolfo & Giraldo-Toro, Andrès & Piyachomkwan, Kuakoon & Sriroth, Klanarong & Dufour, Dominique, 2015. "A comparison of energy use, water use and carbon footprint of cassava starch production in Thailand, Vietnam and Colombia," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-40.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:100:y:2015:i:c:p:31-40
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344915000853
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.04.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amigun, B. & von Blottnitz, H., 2010. "Capacity-cost and location-cost analyses for biogas plants in Africa," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 63-73.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Le Tran Thanh Liem & Yukihiro Tashiro & Pham Van Trong Tinh & Kenji Sakai, 2022. "Reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emission from Seedless Lime Cultivation Using Organic Fertilizer in a Province in Vietnam Mekong Delta Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Osei-Marfo & N. K. Vries & E. Awuah, 2022. "People’s perceptions on the use of human excreta for biogas generation in Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 352-376, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:100:y:2015:i:c:p:31-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.