IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v183y2021ics0921800921000148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the distribution of PM emission rights in various provinces of China based on a new efficiency and equity two-objective DEA model

Author

Listed:
  • Guo, Ji
  • Zhao, Mengke
  • Wu, Xianhua
  • Shi, Beibei
  • Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R.

Abstract

Under the premise that the total emissions of PM(particulate matter) of air pollution is established, the allocation of PMemission rights in various provinces of China is the feasible way to governance the ash haze. In this paper, a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model that takes into account the objectives of efficiency and equity is constructed. On the basis of evaluating the PMemission performance of various provinces in China, the corresponding allocation steps are put forward. Then, the results of theDEAmodel and information entropy are compared. The research shows that: (1) under the same constraint conditions, the emission right of PMis allocated with DEA model, which leads to lower cost, less fluctuation of distribution amount and higher overall national performance. (2) the populationGinicoefficient method is used to evaluate and it is found that the Gini coefficient value is smaller according to the distribution results of DEA model, indicating that the PM emission right amount is more fairly distributed among provinces. The functions of this paper are as follows: (1) a new double-objective DEA model is constructed, which is suitable for multi-agent performance evaluation with multiple objectives; (2) a scheme to allocate PM among provinces is proposed, which can provide reference for the practice of haze reduction in China

Suggested Citation

  • Guo, Ji & Zhao, Mengke & Wu, Xianhua & Shi, Beibei & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R., 2021. "Study on the distribution of PM emission rights in various provinces of China based on a new efficiency and equity two-objective DEA model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:183:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921000148
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800921000148
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meredith Fowlie & Nicholas Muller, 2019. "Market-Based Emissions Regulation When Damages Vary across Sources: What Are the Gains from Differentiation?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(3), pages 593-632.
    2. Baumol,William J. & Oates,Wallace E., 1988. "The Theory of Environmental Policy," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521322249, January.
    3. Grunewald, Nicole & Jakob, Michael & Mouratiadou, Ioanna, 2014. "Decomposing inequality in CO2 emissions: The role of primary energy carriers and economic sectors," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 183-194.
    4. Wang, H. & Zhou, P., 2018. "Assessing Global CO2 Emission Inequality From Consumption Perspective: An Index Decomposition Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 257-271.
    5. Yin, Pengzhen & Chu, Junfei & Wu, Jie & Ding, Jingjing & Yang, Min & Wang, Yuhong, 2020. "A DEA-based two-stage network approach for hotel performance analysis: An internal cooperation perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    7. Yu-Bong Lai, 2007. "The Optimal Distribution of Pollution Rights in the Presence of Political Distortions," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 36(3), pages 367-388, March.
    8. William Nordhaus, 2005. "Life After Kyoto: Alternative Approaches to Global Warming," NBER Working Papers 11889, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Burton, Ellison S. & Sanjour, William, 1970. "A simulation approach to air pollution abatement program planning," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 147-159, March.
    10. Janssen, Marco & Rotmans, Jan, 1995. "Allocation of fossil CO2 emission rights quantifying cultural perspectives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 65-79, April.
    11. Nicholas Z. Muller & Robert Mendelsohn, 2009. "Efficient Pollution Regulation: Getting the Prices Right," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1714-1739, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Jiqiang & Wu, Xianhua & Guo, Ji & Gao, Chao, 2022. "Allocation of SO2 emission rights in city agglomerations considering cross-border transmission of pollutants: A new network DEA model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    2. Dalai Ma & Yaping Xiao & Na Zhao, 2022. "Optimization and Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Carbon Emission Rights Allocation in the Power Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Jiasen Sun & Guo Li, 2022. "Optimizing emission reduction task sharing: technology and performance perspectives," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 581-602, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    2. Abdul Baki, Ghina & Marrouch, Walid, 2022. "Environmental taxation in the Bertrand differentiated duopoly: New insights," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Werner Antweiler, 2017. "Emission trading for air pollution hot spots: getting the permit market right," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 19(1), pages 35-58, January.
    4. Xiaoyan Wang & Minggao Xue & Lu Xing, 2018. "Market-based pollution regulations with damages Varying across space: When the adoption of clean Technology is socially optimal," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 1-5.
    5. David A Keiser & Joseph S Shapiro, 2019. "Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(1), pages 349-396.
    6. Xintao Li & Dong Feng & Jian Li & Zaisheng Zhang, 2019. "Research on the Spatial Network Characteristics and Synergetic Abatement Effect of the Carbon Emissions in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    7. Robert N. Stavins, 2011. "The Problem of the Commons: Still Unsettled after 100 Years," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(1), pages 81-108, February.
    8. David A. Keiser & Joseph K. Shapiro, 2018. "Consequences of the Clean Water Act and the Demand for Water Quality," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 17-wp571, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    9. Muller, Nicholas Z., 2012. "The design of optimal climate policy with air pollution co-benefits," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 696-722.
    10. Yu-Bong Lai, 2009. "Is a Double Dividend Better than a Single Dividend?," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 165(2), pages 342-363, June.
    11. Stephen P. Holland & Erin T. Mansur & Nicholas Z. Muller & Andrew J. Yates, 2015. "Environmental Benefits from Driving Electric Vehicles?," NBER Working Papers 21291, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Jihad C. Elnaboulsi & Wassim Daher & Yiğit Sağlam, 2023. "Environmental taxation, information precision, and information sharing," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 25(2), pages 301-341, April.
    13. Fan, Wei & Li, Li & Wang, Feiran & Li, Ding, 2020. "Driving factors of CO2 emission inequality in China: The role of government expenditure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    14. David Anthoff & Robert Hahn, 2010. "Government failure and market failure: on the inefficiency of environmental and energy policy," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 26(2), pages 197-224, Summer.
    15. Meng Yang & Yisheng Liu & Jinzhao Tian & Feiyu Cheng & Pengbo Song, 2022. "Dynamic Evolution and Regional Disparity in Carbon Emission Intensity in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Cheng, Shulei & Fan, Wei & Zhang, Jian & Wang, Ning & Meng, Fanxin & Liu, Gengyuan, 2021. "Multi-sectoral determinants of carbon emission inequality in Chinese clustering cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    17. Holland, Stephen P. & Yates, Andrew J., 2015. "Optimal trading ratios for pollution permit markets," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 16-27.
    18. Grant Jacobsen, 2016. "Improving Energy Codes," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 1).
    19. Arbex, Marcelo & Behringer, Stefan & Trudeau, Christian, 2017. "Optimal tax policy under heterogeneous environmental preferences," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 79-82.
    20. S. Niggol Seo, 2015. "Adaptation to Global Warming as an Optimal Transition Process to A Greenhouse World," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 272-284, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:183:y:2021:i:c:s0921800921000148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.