Do farmers waste fertilizer? A comparison of ex post optimal nitrogen rates and ex ante recommendations by model, site and year
Abstract
While there appear to be costs to farmers of over-applying nitrogen, there is evidence in many regions that farmers are applying nitrogen at levels that exceed those suggested by government extension services. A major reason why farmers would apparently waste money by applying more fertilizer than a crop can use is a perception that the general recommendations are not appropriate for their individual situations. In this paper we estimate the economically optimal rates for 7 Ontario sites over multiple years using four yield response functional forms to examine whether the profit-maximizing rates as determined at the end of the growing season (ex post optimal rates) are generally higher than recommended rates due to site, year, or yield response functional form differences. There was no statistical or economic basis for selecting one response model over another suggesting functional form choice or perception is not a reason for over-application. However, there was a great deal of variability found between the actual optimal rate for the season and the ex ante recommended rate, which is constant across seasons for a given site. While the recommended rate is higher than the maximum economic rate of nitrogen (MERN) on the majority of sites examined, the distribution is skewed due to a few large differences. When the recommended rate is lower than the ex post MERN in a given year, it tends to occur on less productive sites and is much lower. The pay-off function to alternative nitrogen rates is generally flat as the difference between the MERN and recommended was less than $10/ha on approximately one-third of the trials but there are large differences in the good years on less productive sites. Thus, the decision to apply more than average to take advantage of the good years is appropriate since the cost of over-application is low compared to the cost of under-application. While the pay off to soil testing for nitrogen and consequently variable rate application technology is brought into question, there appears to be significant value to information on the growing conditions for the upcoming season particularly on less productive sites. Another implication of the study is the need to have a sufficient range of application rates in nitrogen field trials for accurate estimation of the underlying response function.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Agricultural Systems.
Volume (Year): 97 (2008)
Issue (Month): 1-2 (April)
Pages: 56-67
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:97:y:2008:i:1-2:p:56-67
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy
For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Jeroen Loos).
Related research
Keywords:References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
- Robert Finger & Werner Hediger, 2008.
"The Application of Robust Regression to a Production Function Comparison – the Example of Swiss Corn,"
IED Working paper
08-02, IED Institute for Environmental Decisions, ETH Zurich.
- Finger, Robert & Hediger, Werner, 2007. "The Application of Robust Regression to a Production Function Comparison – the Example of Swiss Corn," MPRA Paper 4740, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:97:y:2008:i:1-2:p:56-67For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jeroen Loos).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.