The multi-sector model of economic growth is the most widely used framework for empirically investigating the effects of military spending on growth. It has also been applied to ‘nonmilitary’ sectors of the economy, such as exporters and the government. This paper presents a survey of criticisms in the context of models with a military sector (but also applicable to nonmilitary models). These include: the possibility of spurious correlations, misspecification biases, observational equivalence and invalid statistical inferences concerning a key parameter of the model. It is concluded, therefore, that overcoming these shortcomings or finding a more robust, alternative approach would be worthwhile.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (M. Carmen Guisan).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: O41 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.: