IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cys/ecocyb/v50y2017i4p189-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multidimensional Model for the Bridging Social Capital as Perceived by University Students on Facebook

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandru BALOG

    (National Institute for Research & Development in Informatics)

  • Costin PRIBEANU

    (National Institute for Research & Development in Informatics)

Abstract

The increasing popularity of Facebook among university students stimulates the study of social networking websites and associated social phenomena. As social networking websites are able to provide valuable resources for students there is an increasing interest in measuring the social capital that is formed and developed in university contexts. This paper presents an empirical validation of a multidimensional model for the bridging social capital that has been conceptualized as a global factor with three dimensions: outward looking, broader group, and meeting new people. The model has been tested and crossvalidated using two samples collected from two Romanian universities. The results show that the multidimensional model is a better conceptualization having a higher explanatory power than the unidimensional model. An analysis of invariance shows that the proposed scale is equivalent across university profiles thus enabling group comparisons.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandru BALOG & Costin PRIBEANU, 2017. "A Multidimensional Model for the Bridging Social Capital as Perceived by University Students on Facebook," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(4), pages 189-206.
    • Handle: RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2017:i:4:p:189-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://www.eadr.ro/RePEc/cys/ecocyb_pdf/ecocyb4_2017p189-206.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koufteros, Xenophon & Babbar, Sunil & Kaighobadi, Mehdi, 2009. "A paradigm for examining second-order factor models employing structural equation modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 633-652, August.
    2. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & Baumgartner, Hans, 1998. "Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(1), pages 78-90, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Brailovskaia & Muyu Lin & Saskia Scholten & Meixia Zhu & Yue Fu & Meihua Shao & Shuqing Hu & Xuan Li & Wenting Guo & Dan Cai & Shan Lu & Jürgen Margraf, 2022. "A Qualitative Cross-Cultural Comparison of Well-Being Constructs: the Meaning of Happiness, Life Satisfaction, and Social Support for German and Chinese Students," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1379-1402, April.
    2. Jiabin Li & Xianwei Liu & Yang Zou & Yichu Deng & Meng Zhang & Miaomiao Yu & Dongjiao Wu & Hao Zheng & Xinliang Zhao, 2021. "Factors Affecting COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors among University Students in Beijing, China: An Empirical Study Based on the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
    3. Tsukasa Kato, 2021. "Measurement Invariance in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) Scale among English-Speaking Whites and Asians," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Toufaily, Elissar & Pons, Frank, 2017. "Impact of customers' assessment of website attributes on e-relationship in the securities brokerage industry: A multichannel perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 58-69.
    5. Knoppen, Desirée & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2017. "Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 15-25.
    6. Anselmsson, Johan & Burt, Steve & Tunca, Burak, 2017. "An integrated retailer image and brand equity framework: Re-examining, extending, and restructuring retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 194-203.
    7. Elliot, Statia & Papadopoulos, Nicolas, 2016. "Of products and tourism destinations: An integrative, cross-national study of place image," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1157-1165.
    8. Janina Isabel Steinert & Lucie Dale Cluver & G. J. Melendez-Torres & Sebastian Vollmer, 2018. "One Size Fits All? The Validity of a Composite Poverty Index Across Urban and Rural Households in South Africa," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 51-72, February.
    9. Yeung, Matthew C.H. & Ramasamy, Bala & Chen, Junsong & Paliwoda, Stan, 2013. "Customer satisfaction and consumer expenditure in selected European countries," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 406-416.
    10. Choe, Danbi, 2020. "Parents’ and adolescents’ perceptions of parental support as predictors of adolescents’ academic achievement and self-regulated learning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Dana L. Alden & John Friend & Ping Yein Lee & Yew Kong Lee & Lyndal Trevena & Chirk Jenn Ng & Sorapop Kiatpongsan & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Miho Tanaka & Supanida Limpongsanurak, 2018. "Who Decides: Me or We? Family Involvement in Medical Decision Making in Eastern and Western Countries," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1), pages 14-25, January.
    12. Kipnis, Eva & Demangeot, Catherine & Pullig, Chris & Broderick, Amanda J., 2019. "Consumer Multicultural Identity Affiliation: Reassessing identity segmentation in multicultural markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 126-141.
    13. Martin Lukac & Nadja Doerflinger & Valeria Pulignano, 2019. "Developing a Cross-National Comparative Framework for Studying Labour Market Segmentation: Measurement Equivalence with Latent Class Analysis," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 145(1), pages 233-255, August.
    14. Park, Cheol & Lee, Thae Min, 2009. "Antecedents of Online Reviews' Usage and Purchase Influence: An Empirical Comparison of U.S. and Korean Consumers," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 332-340.
    15. Thøgersen, John, 2017. "Housing-related lifestyle and energy saving: A multi-level approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 73-87.
    16. Buchanan, Erin Michelle & Foreman, Riley E. & Huber, Becca Nicole & Pavlacic, Jeffrey Michael & Swadley, Rachel N. & Schulenberg, Stefan E., 2017. "Does the Delivery Matter? Examining Randomization at the Item Level," OSF Preprints p93df, Center for Open Science.
    17. Matanda, Margaret Jekanyika & Freeman, Susan, 2009. "Effect of perceived environmental uncertainty on exporter-importer inter-organisational relationships and export performance improvement," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 89-107, February.
    18. Zhao, Mengli & Yang, Jianjun & Shu, Chengli & Liu, Jinxin, 2021. "Sustainability orientation, the adoption of 3D printing technologies, and new product performance: A cross-institutional study of American and Indian firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Stadler Blank, Ashley & Koenigstorfer, Joerg & Baumgartner, Hans, 2018. "Sport team personality: It’s not all about winning!," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 114-132.
    20. Walsh, Gianfranco & Bartikowski, Boris, 2013. "Exploring corporate ability and social responsibility associations as antecedents of customer satisfaction cross-culturally," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(8), pages 989-995.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social capital; bridging social capital; multidimensional model; Facebook; Structural Equation Modeling; Multi-group CFA.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2017:i:4:p:189-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.