IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cys/ecocyb/v50y2017i3p109-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Particularities of Management Tools Employed within Romanian Organizations. A Pilot Study

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Cătălina ȘTEFAN
  • Ion POPA

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Octavian Cosmin DOBRIN

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Doina I. POPESCU

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the particularities of management tools employed within Romanian organizations and the possible influences they might have on the economic and managerial capabilities. The information collected through the survey conducted in March-May 2015 within 94 organizations in southeastern Romania, allowed us to analyze the particularities of management systems. In this paper, we will focus on other management tools (management methods and techniques). To achieve the aim of the research, five hypotheses were formulated and tested through statistical means.The main results were found to be in line with the theoretical approach and previous research and validated most of the formulated hypotheses. In particular, it was found that to achieve managerial performance, is not enough to implement any of the management tools, but their methodology of design and implementation should be known and properly applied. Managers wanting to enhance their organizations' managerial performance should be aware of the importance of acquire and put into practice managerial knowledge. Thus, it will be created the premises for shaping the directions and means of action able to increase the organizations' competitiveness and performance, through modernization of management tools.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Cătălina ȘTEFAN & Ion POPA & Octavian Cosmin DOBRIN & Doina I. POPESCU, 2017. "Particularities of Management Tools Employed within Romanian Organizations. A Pilot Study," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(3), pages 109-125.
    • Handle: RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2017:i:3:p:109-125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: ftp://www.eadr.ro/RePEc/cys/ecocyb_pdf/ecocyb3_2017p109-125.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas C. Powell, 1995. "Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 15-37.
    2. Ion VERBONCU & Luise ZEININGER, 2015. "The Manager and the Managerial Tools: Job Description," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(5), pages 603-614, December.
    3. Mircea BÃCALÃ & Nicolae BIBU, 2013. "Considerations Regarding the Application of Management Tools in Public Institutions - CAF (Common Assessment Framework) in a Romanian Regional Context," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(5), pages 746-754, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Cãtãlina ?TEFAN, 2018. "Do The Management Tools Care For Health Organizations?," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 89-101, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Freiesleben, Johannes, 2008. "A proposal for an economic quality loss function," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 1012-1024, June.
    2. Younès El Manzani & Mohamed Larbi Sidmou & Jean-Jack Cegarra, 2018. "Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory," Post-Print hal-03080217, HAL.
    3. Lutfi, Abdalwali & Alrawad, Mahmaod & Alsyouf, Adi & Almaiah, Mohammed Amin & Al-Khasawneh, Ahmad & Al-Khasawneh, Akif Lutfi & Alshira'h, Ahmad Farhan & Alshirah, Malek Hamed & Saad, Mohamed & Ibrahim, 2023. "Drivers and impact of big data analytic adoption in the retail industry: A quantitative investigation applying structural equation modeling," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    4. Krohmer, Harley & Homburg, Christian & Workman, John P., 2002. "Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 451-465, June.
    5. Khor Saw Chin* & Saudah Sofian & Oh Yit Leng, 2018. "The Impact of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance in Malaysian Public Listed Companies," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 22-30:2.
    6. Ilona Baumane & Rebekka Vedina, 2011. "Capacities and Competencies as Sources of Competitive Advantage: The Case Study of Latvian Hotels," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(2), pages 301-318, May.
    7. Youssef Fahmi, 2002. "Contribution à une théorie de la gestion de la qualité totale: les déterminants de l'efficacité," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 5(3), pages 115-140, September.
    8. Golini, Ruggero & Kalchschmidt, Matteo, 2015. "Managing inventories in global sourcing contexts: A contingency perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 64-78.
    9. Kevin F Mole & George Bramley, 2006. "Making Policy Choices in Nonfinancial Business Support: An International Comparison," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 24(6), pages 885-908, December.
    10. Freiesleben, Johannes, 2010. "Proposing a new approach to discussing economic effects of design quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 348-359, April.
    11. Dostie Benoit & Jayaraman Rajshri, 2012. "Organizational Redesign, Information Technologies and Workplace Productivity," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-41, February.
    12. Khavul, Susanna & Pérez-Nordtvedt, Liliana & Wood, Eric, 2010. "Organizational entrainment and international new ventures from emerging markets," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 104-119, January.
    13. Daraio, Cinzia & Simar, Leopold & Wilson, Paul, 2019. "Quality and its impact on efficiency," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019004, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Cho, Young Sik & Jung, Joo Y. & Linderman, Kevin, 2017. "The QM evolution: Behavioral quality management as a firm’s strategic resource," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 233-249.
    15. Jun-Der Leu & Wen-Hsien Tsai & Mei-Niang Fan & Sophia Chuang, 2020. "Benchmarking Sustainable Manufacturing: A DEA-Based Method and Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-21, November.
    16. Adrian S. Choo & Kevin W. Linderman & Roger G. Schroeder, 2007. "Method and Psychological Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Quality Improvement Projects," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(3), pages 437-450, March.
    17. Chi-Hsiang Chen & Ming-ji Lin, 2011. "An assessment of post-M&A integration influences on new product development performance: An empirical analysis from China, Taiwan, and HK," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 807-831, December.
    18. Vera Ferrón Vílchez & Nicole Darnall, 2016. "Two are Better Than One: The Link Between Management Systems and Business Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 221-240, May.
    19. Esra ÇAPACIOĞLU & Necdet ÖZÇAKAR & Onur ÇETİN, 2018. "Kamu Kurumlarında Toplam Kalite Yönetimi Uygulamalarının Deming Yönetim Metodu ile Analizi," Istanbul Management Journal, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 29(85), pages 107-125, December.
    20. David G. Sirmon & Jean–Luc Arregle & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb, 2008. "The Role of Family Influence in Firms’ Strategic Responses to Threat of Imitation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 32(6), pages 979-998, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic performance; management method; management technique; managerial tools; economic performance; managerial capabilities.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • L20 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - General
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2017:i:3:p:109-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Corina Saman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.