IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v20y2021i1p48-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Small French Farms Provide an Opportunity for Employment in the Agricultural Sector?

Author

Listed:
  • Pauline Lecole

Abstract

The contributions of small farms to the environment or employment are increasingly recognised. Yet small farm employment receives little support from public policies. Can small farms provide employment opportunities in the agricultural sector? The objective of this work is to contribute to reflections on a better adaptation of public support to the heterogeneity of the contributions of small farms to employment. This article focuses on the example of France, using the 2010 agricultural census data. It proposes a typology of workforce patterns in French small farms. In 2010, labour‐intensive small farms with paid worker(s) accounted for just over 2 per cent of small farms in France. They were managed by trained farmers, sometimes newcomers to agriculture, and had high value‐added activities like agrotourism, short distribution channels and/or organic farming production. We conclude with recommendations for European and national public policies aimed at encouraging the maintenance and/or creation of employment on small farms. They include, for example, specific support for small farms, adapted to their lower investment needs and a lighter administrative burden to enable them to develop labour‐intensive projects; or a better integration of small farms into employers’ alliances. Les contributions des petites exploitations à l'environnement ou à l'emploi sont de plus en plus reconnues. Pourtant, l’emploi dans les petites exploitations est peu soutenu par les politiques publiques. Les petites exploitations agricoles peuvent‐elles offrir des opportunités d'emploi dans le secteur agricole ? L'objectif de ce travail est de contribuer à des réflexions sur une meilleure adaptation des aides publiques à l'hétérogénéité des contributions des petites exploitations à l'emploi. Cet article se concentre sur l'exemple de la France, à partir des données du recensement agricole de 2010. Il propose une typologie des profils de main‐d'œuvre dans les petites exploitations françaises. En 2010, les petites exploitations à forte intensité de main‐d'œuvre avec un ou des travailleurs rémunérés représentaient un peu plus de 2 pour cent des petites exploitations en France. Elles étaient gérées par des agriculteurs formés, parfois nouveaux venus dans l'agriculture, et avaient des activités à forte valeur ajoutée comme l'agrotourisme, les circuits courts de distribution et / ou la production agricole biologique. Nous concluons par des recommandations pour des politiques publiques européennes et nationales visant à encourager le maintien et / ou la création d'emplois dans les petites exploitations. Elles comprennent, par exemple, un soutien spécifique aux petites exploitations, adapté à leurs faibles besoins d'investissement et une charge administrative plus légère pour leur permettre de développer des projets à forte intensité de main‐d'œuvre ; ou une meilleure intégration des petites exploitations dans les alliances patronales. Der Beitrag kleiner landwirtschaftlicher Betriebe zum Umweltschutz oder zur Beschäftigung wird zunehmend anerkannt. Dennoch wird die Bereitstellung von Arbeitsplätzen in kleinbäuerlichen Betrieben von der öffentlichen Politik kaum gefördert. Können kleinbäuerliche Betriebe Beschäftigungsmöglichkeiten in der Landwirtschaft bieten? Ziel dieser Studie ist es, einen Beitrag zu den Überlegungen zur besseren Anpassung der öffentlichen Förderung an die unterschiedlichen Beiträge von kleinen landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben zur Schaffung von Arbeitsplätzen zu leisten. In diesem Artikel konzentrieren wir uns unter Verwendung der Daten der Agrarstatistik aus dem Jahr 2010 auf das Beispiel Frankreichs. Wir schlagen eine Klassifizierung der Beschäftigungsmuster in französischen kleinbäuerlichen Betrieben vor. Im Jahr 2010 machten arbeitsintensive kleine Betriebe mit bezahlten Arbeitskräften etwas mehr als 2 Prozent aller kleinbäuerlichen Betriebe in Frankreich aus. Sie wurden von ausgebildeten Landwirten und Landwirtinnen geführt, die mitunter neu in den Sektor eingestiegen sind. Die Betriebe wiesen Aktivitäten mit hoher Wertschöpfung, wie Agrotourismus, kurze Vertriebswege und/oder ökologische Bewirtschaftungsmethoden auf. Unser Beitrag schließt mit Empfehlungen für europäische und nationale Politiken, die das Ziel verfolgen, Arbeitsplätze in kleinbäuerlichen Betrieben zu erhalten und zu schaffen. Dazu gehört z.B. eine spezielle Unterstützung von kleinen landwirtschaftlichen Betrieben, die an ihren geringeren Investitionsbedarf angepasst ist. Darüber hinaus empfehlen wir, den Verwaltungsaufwand für diese Betriebe zu verringern, um ihnen die Entwicklung arbeitsintensiver Projekte zu ermöglichen. Es wäre ebenfalls wichtig, diese Betriebe besser in Arbeitgeberverbände zu integrieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Pauline Lecole, 2021. "Can Small French Farms Provide an Opportunity for Employment in the Agricultural Sector?," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 20(1), pages 48-54, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:48-54
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12290
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter B. R. Hazell, 2005. "Is there a future for small farms?," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 93-101, January.
    2. Cristina Salvioni & Eleni Papadopoulou & Maria Dos Santos, 2014. "Small Farm Survival in Greece, Italy and Portugal," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 13(1), pages 52-57, April.
    3. Catherine Benjamin & Alessandro Corsi & Hervé Guyomard, 1996. "Modelling labour decisions of French agricultural households," Post-Print hal-01931609, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oksana Žabko & Talis Tisenkopfs, 2022. "New Entrants Need Tailored Farm Advice," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(1), pages 63-69, April.
    2. Štefan Bojnec & Kristina Knific, 2021. "Farm Household Income Diversification as a Survival Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pauline Lécole, 2020. "Small French Farms and Employment: are they creating wage labour," CEE-M Working Papers hal-03027189, CEE-M, Universtiy of Montpellier, CNRS, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro.
    2. Pauline Lécole, 2020. "Small French Farms and Employment: are they creating wage labour," Working Papers hal-03027189, HAL.
    3. Waithaka, M.M. & Thornton, P.K. & Herrero, M. & Shepherd, K.D., 2006. "Bio-economic evaluation of farmers' perceptions of viable farms in western Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-3), pages 243-271, October.
    4. Elias Giannakis & Adriana Bruggeman, 2017. "Economic crisis and regional resilience: Evidence from Greece," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(3), pages 451-476, August.
    5. Glauben, Thomas & Herzfeld, Thomas & Wang, Xiaobing, 2005. "Labor Market Participation of Chinese Agricultural Households," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24516, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Peter Hazell & Joachim Von Braun, 2006. "Aid to Agriculture, Growth and Poverty Reduction," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 5(1), pages 6-13, April.
    7. Dupraz, Pierre & Latruffe, Laure, 2015. "Trends in family labour, hired labour and contract work on French field crop farms: The role of the Common Agricultural Policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 104-118.
    8. Glauben, Thomas & Herzfeld, Thomas & Wang, Xiaobing, 2008. "Labor market participation of Chinese agricultural households: Empirical evidence from Zhejiang province," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 329-340, August.
    9. Helfand, Steven M. & Taylor, Matthew P.H., 2021. "The inverse relationship between farm size and productivity: Refocusing the debate," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Tina L. Saitone & Richard J. Sexton & Benoît Malan, 2018. "Price premiums, payment delays, and default risk: understanding developing country farmers’ decisions to market through a cooperative or a private trader," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(3), pages 363-380, May.
    11. Michael Halewood & Ana Bedmar Villanueva & Jazzy Rasolojaona & Michelle Andriamahazo & Naritiana Rakotoniaina & Bienvenu Bossou & Toussaint Mikpon & Raymond Vodouhe & Lena Fey & Andreas Drews & P. Lav, 2021. "Enhancing farmers’ agency in the global crop commons through use of biocultural community protocols," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(2), pages 579-594, June.
    12. Kaditi, Eleni A., 2013. "The Impact of CAP Reforms on Farm Labour Structure," Working papers 157914, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    13. Catherine Benjamin & Ayal Kimhi, 2006. "Farm work, off-farm work, and hired farm labour: estimating a discrete-choice model of French farm couples' labour decisions," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(2), pages 149-171, June.
    14. Nalini Bikkina & Rama Mohana R. Turaga & Vaibhav Bhamoriya, 2018. "Farmer producer organizations as farmer collectives: A case study from India," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(6), pages 669-687, October.
    15. Aurélie Darpeix & Céline Bignebat & Philippe Perrier-Cornet, 2014. "Demand for Seasonal Wage Labour in Agriculture: What Does Family Farming Hide?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 65(1), pages 257-272, January.
    16. Solfanelli, Francesco & Ozturk, Emel & Pugliese, Patrizia & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2021. "Potential outcomes and impacts of organic group certification in Italy: An evaluative case study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    17. Jinning Li & Shunfeng Song & Guanglin Sun, 2022. "Non-Farm Employment, Farmland Renting and Farming Ability: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Kathrin Happe & Hauke Schnicke & Christoph Sahrbacher & Konrad Kellermann, 2009. "Will They Stay or Will They Go? Simulating the Dynamics of Single‐Holder Farms in a Dualistic Farm Structure in Slovakia," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 497-511, December.
    19. Hisham S. El-Osta & Ashok K. Mishra & Mitchell J. Morehart, 2008. "Off-Farm Labor Participation Decisions of Married Farm Couples and the Role of Government Payments," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 311-332.
    20. Green, Erik & Hillbom, Ellen & Lindgren, Mattias, 2011. "Principal Trends and Debates in African Agricultural Development," MPRA Paper 92547, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:20:y:2021:i:1:p:48-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.