IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v21y1999i1p21-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meat and milk self‐sufficiency in Asia: forecast trends and implications

Author

Listed:
  • A.S. Rutherford

Abstract

Recent structural changes in dietary patterns in Asia resulting from economic development are placing increasing pressure on the existing production systems in the region‐particularly those systems producing ruminant meat, non‐ruminant meat and milk. This has significant policy implications for the countries in the region in terms of self‐sufficiency goals in these commodities and the associated inter‐and intra‐regional trade opportunities in the future. Forecasts of ruminant meat, non‐ruminant meat and milk production and consumption for selected Asian countries between the years 2000 and 2010 revealed the following: China, Pakistan and Viet Nam are likely to be self‐sufficient with respect to ruminant meat; Malaysia is likely to continue to be a net importer of ruminant meat; India and Malaysia will be more than self‐sufficient with respect to non‐runvinant meat with the converse being true for Pakistan; and India, Laos and Pakistan will be self‐sufficient with respect to milk production with the possibility of Indonesia, Thailand and Cambodia becoming self‐sufficient if the current trends continue. Structural changes in the early 1980s generally resulted in higher average annual growth rates of production‐particularly in non‐ruminant meat production. Thus forecasts of ruminant meat production and consumption by 2000 using the medium‐term average annual growth rates for production present a more favourable outcome in terms of self‐sufficiency for countries such as Bangladesh, the Philippines and Viet Nam but a less favourable outcome for countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Laos and India. Similar forecasts for non‐ruminant meat indicated an improvement in the long‐term non‐ruminant self‐sufficiency estimates for most cases‐particularly for Bangladesh, China and Cambodia. Intensification and commercialisation of meat production systems have increased meat self‐sufficiency in a number of countries but often at the expense of grain self‐sufficiency. Given these trends, the impact of trade liberalisation measures on livestock production in the region and inter‐and intra‐regional trade of livestock commodities and grain is likely to be significant.

Suggested Citation

  • A.S. Rutherford, 1999. "Meat and milk self‐sufficiency in Asia: forecast trends and implications," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 21(1), pages 21-39, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:21:y:1999:i:1:p:21-39
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00581.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00581.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1999.tb00581.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allan N. Rae & Hengyun Ma & Jikun Huang & Scott Rozelle, 2006. "Livestock in China: Commodity-Specific Total Factor Productivity Decomposition Using New Panel Data," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(3), pages 680-695.
    2. Beibei Wu & Xudong Shang & Yongfu Chen, 2021. "Household dairy demand by income groups in an urban Chinese province: A multistage budgeting approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 629-649, July.
    3. Fuller, Frank H. & Beghin, John C. & Rozelle, Scott, 2007. "Consumption of dairy products in urban China: results from Beijing, Shangai and Guangzhou," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(4), pages 1-16.
    4. Huidan Xue & Chenguang Li & Liming Wang, 2021. "Spatial Price Dynamics and Asymmetric Price Transmission in Skim Milk Powder International Trade: Evidence from Export Prices for New Zealand and Ireland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Junfei Bai & Thomas I. Wahl & Jill J. McCluskey, 2008. "Fluid milk consumption in urban Qingdao, China ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(2), pages 133-147, June.
    6. Ma, Hengyun & Rae, Allan N. & Huang, Jikun, 2004. "Livestock Productivity In China: Data Revision And Total Factor Productivity Decomposition," China Agriculture Project Working Papers 23691, Massey University, Centre for Applied Economics and Policy Studies.
    7. Beghin, John C., 2006. "Evolving dairy markets in Asia: Recent findings and implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 195-200, June.
    8. Stein Kristiansen, 2003. "Information Asymmetry and Economic Concentration: The case of hens and eggs in eastern Indonesia," Working Papers 03-21, Agricultural and Development Economics Division of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO - ESA).
    9. Nin, Alejandro & Hertel, Thomas W. & Foster, Kenneth & Rae, Allan, 2004. "Productivity growth, catching-up and uncertainty in China's meat trade," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 1-16, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:21:y:1999:i:1:p:21-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.