This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The student evaluation of teaching: its failure as a research program, and as an administrative guide

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Robert Sproule () (Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1M 0C8, Canada)
C?lin Vâlsan () (Bishop's University, Sherbrooke, Québec, J1M 0C8, Canada)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This paper points up the methodological inadequacy of the "student evaluation of teaching" as a research program. We do this by reference to three, interrelated arguments. The first is that the student evaluation of teaching cannot claim to capture the wisdom of a crowd because, as a research program, it fails to meet Surowiecki's conditions for the existence and articulation of the wisdom of a crowd. The second argument extends the first, by stating: (a) the "student evaluation of teaching" research program fails to provide the methodological controls needed to differentiate cause from effect, or put differently (b) the methodological underpinnings of this research program is tantamount to the misapplication of a closed-system paradigm to an open social system. The third argument has two parts. These are that this research program is predicated on: (a) a false analogy between the workings of a business and a university, and therefore (b) on a mischaracterization of the student-professor relationship. These three arguments, these three failures, suggest that the "student evaluation of teaching" research program is methodologically ill-conceived and incoherent, and therefore cannot, with any credulity, serve as a guide to the administration and governance of a university.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_641.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania in its journal The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.

Volume (Year): 11 (2009)
Issue (Month): 25 (February)
Pages: 125-150
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:11:y:2009:i:25:p:125-150

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 6 ROMANA PLACE, 70167 - BUCHAREST
Phone: 0040-01-2112650
Fax: 0040-01-3129549
Email:
Web page: http://amfiteatrueconomic.ase.ro/
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Gavrila Alexandru).

Related research
Keywords: Student evaluation of teaching; validity; biases; fallacies;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education Research Institutions
L3 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

  1. Bunge, Mario, 2000. "Systemism: the alternative to individualism and holism," The Journal of Socio-Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 147-157. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  2. Krautmann, Anthony C. & Sander, William, 1999. "Grades and student evaluations of teachers," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 59-63, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Denis, Andy, 2003. "Methodology and policy prescription in economic thought: a response to Mario Bunge," The Journal of Socio-Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 219-226, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. von Hayek, Friedrich August, 1989. "The Pretence of Knowledge," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(6), pages 3-7, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  5. Sproule, Robert, 2002. "The underdetermination of instructor performance by data from the student evaluation of teaching," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 287-294, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Bradley A. Hansen & Mary Eschelbach Hansen, 2005. "Don't Put the Cart Before the Horse: Teaching the Economic Approach to Empirical Research," Working Papers 2005-12, American University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  7. Bruce Caldwell, 1997. "Hayek and Socialism," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 1856-1890, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Lawson, Tony, 1989. "Realism and Instrumentalism in the Development of Econometrics," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 236-58, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Victoria Chick & Sheila Dow, 2005. "The meaning of open systems," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 363-381, September. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  10. Hamermesh, Daniel S. & Parker, Amy, 2005. "Beauty in the classroom: instructors' pulchritude and putative pedagogical productivity," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 369-376, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Each page is provided with a technical contact, in case something is not right with the supplied information. See under "publisher info".

This page was last updated on 2009-11-21.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.