IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/pit/wpaper/489.html

Speculative Overpricing in Asset Markets with Information Flows

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Xu, Zhiwei & Wang, Xuefei & Zhang, Teng, 2024. "The international natural gas price and its cross-sectional pricing implication: Evidence from Chinese stock market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
  2. Owen Powell & Natalia Shestakova, 2017. "The robustness of mispricing results in experimental asset markets," Vienna Economics Papers 1702, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
  3. Thomas Stöckl, 2013. "Price efficiency and trading behavior in limit order markets with competing insiders," Working Papers 2013-11, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
  4. Huan Xie & Jipeng Zhang, 2016. "Bubbles and experience: An experiment with a steady inflow of new traders," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 82(4), pages 1349-1373, April.
  5. Penasse, J.N.G. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2014. "Bubbles and Trading Frenzies : Evidence from the Art Market," Other publications TiSEM bf0d8984-df7f-4f02-afc7-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  6. Dirk-Jan Janssen & Sascha Füllbrunn & Utz Weitzel, 2019. "Individual speculative behavior and overpricing in experimental asset markets," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 22(3), pages 653-675, September.
  7. Nisvan Erkal & Lata Gangadharan & Boon Han Koh, 2022. "By chance or by choice? Biased attribution of others’ outcomes when social preferences matter," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(2), pages 413-443, April.
  8. repec:grz:wpsses:2014-01 is not listed on IDEAS
  9. Aktham I. Maghyereh & Basel Awartani, 2025. "The speculative tech bubbles of US artificial intelligence sector," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 14(4), pages 177-192.
  10. Kai Barron, 2021. "Belief updating: does the ‘good-news, bad-news’ asymmetry extend to purely financial domains?," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(1), pages 31-58, March.
  11. Marco Ottaviani & Peter Norman Sørensen, 2015. "Price Reaction to Information with Heterogeneous Beliefs and Wealth Effects: Underreaction, Momentum, and Reversal," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(1), pages 1-34, January.
  12. Majid Karimi & Stanko Dimitrov, 2018. "On the Road to Making Science of “Art”: Risk Bias in Market Scoring Rules," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 72-89, June.
  13. Zinn, Jesse, 2013. "Modelling Biased Judgement with Weighted Updating," MPRA Paper 50310, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  14. Thomas Stöckl, 2014. "Price efficiency and trading behavior in limit order markets with competing insiders," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(2), pages 314-334, June.
  15. Zhang, Teng & Li, Jiaqi & Xu, Zhiwei, 2024. "Speculative trading, stock returns and asset pricing anomalies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
  16. Xu, Zhiwei & Yang, Yinan & Zhang, Teng, 2026. "Investor disagreement and state-dependent mispricing: New evidence on the analyst dispersion anomaly," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
  17. Berggrun, Luis & Cardona, Emilio & Lizarzaburu, Edmundo, 2019. "Extreme daily returns and the cross-section of expected returns: Evidence from Brazil," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 201-211.
  18. Merl, Robert & Palan, Stefan & Schmidt, Dominik & Stöckl, Thomas, 2023. "Insider trading regulation and trader migration," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
  19. Utz Weitzel & Christoph Huber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler & Florian Lindner & Julia Rose & Lauren Cohen, 2020. "Bubbles and Financial Professionals," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(6), pages 2659-2696.
  20. Mantovani, Marco & Filippin, Antonio, 2026. "When do prediction markets return average beliefs? Experimental evidence," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 135-148.
  21. Nicolas Cofre & Magdalena Mosionek-Schweda, 2023. "A simulated electronic market with speculative behaviour and bubble formation," Papers 2311.12247, arXiv.org.
  22. Cofre, Nicolas & Mosionek-Schweda, Magdalena, 2024. "A simulated electronic market with speculative behaviour and bubble formation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
  23. Owen Powell & Natalia Shestakova, 2017. "The robustness of mispricing results in experimental asset markets," Vienna Economics Papers vie1702, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
  24. Tolhurst, Tor N., "undated". "A Model-Free Bubble Detection Method: Application to the World Market for Superstar Wines," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274387, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  25. Jesse Aaron Zinn, 2015. "Expanding the Weighted Updating Model," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(1), pages 182-186.
  26. Alizadeh, Amir H. & Thanopoulou, Helen & Yip, Tsz Leung, 2017. "Investors’ behavior and dynamics of ship prices: A heterogeneous agent model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 98-114.
  27. Owen Powell & Natalia Shestakova, 2017. "Experimental asset markets: behavior and bubbles," Chapters, in: Morris Altman (ed.), Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making, chapter 21, pages 375-391, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  28. Ma, Jiantao & Zhang, Yuanyi, 2025. "Option price asymmetry, speculation and stock short-sale cost," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
  29. Fong, Wai Mun & Toh, Benjamin, 2014. "Investor sentiment and the MAX effect," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 190-201.
  30. Remorov, Alexander, 2015. "Dynamic Trading When You May Be Wrong," MPRA Paper 63964, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 27 Apr 2015.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.