IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/inm/ormnsc/v65y2019i10p4555-4574.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

When Anomalies Are Publicized Broadly, Do Institutions Trade Accordingly?

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Charlotte Christiansen & Ran Xing & Yue Xu, 2020. "Origins of Mutual Fund Skill: Market versus Accounting Based Asset Pricing Anomalies," CREATES Research Papers 2020-14, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
  2. Xufeng Liu & Die Wan, 2022. "Does short‐selling affect mutual fund shareholdings? Evidence from China," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1887-1923, April.
  3. Wen, Fenghua & Zou, Qian & Wang, Xiong, 2021. "The contrarian strategy of institutional investors in Chinese stock market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
  4. François-Éric Racicot & Raymond Théoret, 2022. "Tracking market and non-traditional sources of risks in procyclical and countercyclical hedge fund strategies under extreme scenarios: a nonlinear VAR approach," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-56, December.
  5. Bartram, Söhnke & Djuranovik, Leslie & Garratt, Anthony, 2021. "Currency Anomalies," CEPR Discussion Papers 15653, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  6. Cakici, Nusret & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Będowska-Sójka, Barbara & Zaremba, Adam, 2024. "Machine learning and the cross-section of cryptocurrency returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
  7. repec:osf:socarx:z7k3p_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  8. Jacobs, Heiko & Müller, Sebastian, 2020. "Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 213-230.
  9. Feifei Wang & Xuemin Sterling Yan & Lingling Zheng, 2024. "Do sophisticated investors follow fundamental analysis strategies? Evidence from hedge funds and mutual funds," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1097-1146, June.
  10. Andrew Y. Chen & Alejandro Lopez-Lira & Tom Zimmermann, 2022. "Does Peer-Reviewed Research Help Predict Stock Returns?," Papers 2212.10317, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
  11. Charoenwong, Ben & Nettayanun, Sampan & Saengchote, Kanis, 2021. "Digesting anomalies: A q-factor approach for the Thai market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
  12. Kim, Donghoon & Kang, Jangkoo & Roh, Soohyun, 2025. "Market participants' trading behavior toward anomalies: Evidence from the Korean market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
  13. Palani-Rajan Kadapakkam & Hongxian Zhang & Sinan Yildirim, 2021. "A reexamination of the tendering profit anomaly," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1475-1501, May.
  14. Wang, Wenzhao & Duxbury, Darren, 2021. "Institutional investor sentiment and the mean-variance relationship: Global evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 415-441.
  15. Wang, Feifei & Yan, Xuemin Sterling & Zheng, Lingling, 2024. "Institutional trading, news, and accounting anomalies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1).
  16. Jiao, Yawen, 2022. "Decision-based trades: An analysis of institutional investors’ information advantages," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 104-115.
  17. Zhang, Jinhua & Wang, Guipu & Yan, Cheng, 2020. "Can foreign equity funds outperform their benchmarks? New evidence from fund-holding data for China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 11-20.
  18. Birru, Justin & Gokkaya, Sinan & Liu, Xi & Markov, Stanimir, 2024. "Quants and market anomalies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1).
  19. Han, Chunmao & Shi, Yongdong, 2022. "Chinese stock anomalies and investor sentiment," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
  20. Alex R. Horenstein, 2021. "The Unintended Impact of Academic Research on Asset Returns: The Capital Asset Pricing Model Alpha," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3655-3673, June.
  21. Ilan Cooper & Liang Ma & Paulo Maio, 2022. "What Does the Cross‐Section Tell About Itself? Explaining Equity Risk Premia with Stock Return Moments," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 54(1), pages 73-118, February.
  22. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
  23. Chen, Haosi (Chelsea) & Puckett, Andy, 2023. "Do Hedge Funds Value Sell-Side Analysts Differently?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
  24. Engelberg, Joseph & McLean, R. David & Pontiff, Jeffrey, 2020. "Analysts and anomalies," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(1).
  25. Goh, Jihoon & Jeon, Byounghyun, 2025. "Which investor corrects mispricing around earnings announcements?," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  26. Mustafa O. Caglayan & Umut Celiker & Gokhan Sonaer, 2022. "Disagreement between hedge funds and other institutional investors and the cross‐section of expected stock returns," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 663-689, August.
  27. Martineau, Charles, 2021. "Rest in Peace Post-Earnings Announcement Drift," SocArXiv z7k3p, Center for Open Science.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.