IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/eee/jhecon/v65y2019icp93-102.html

Stubbing out hypothetical bias: improving tobacco market predictions by combining stated and revealed preference data

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Integrative synthesis of empirical evidence and conceptualisation of external validity," Papers 2102.02940, arXiv.org.
  2. Buckell, John & White, Justin S. & Shang, Ce, 2020. "Can incentive-compatibility reduce hypothetical bias in smokers’ experimental choice behavior? A randomized discrete choice experiment," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
  3. Donald S. Kenkel & Sida Peng & Michael F. Pesko & Hua Wang, 2020. "Mostly harmless regulation? Electronic cigarettes, public policy, and consumer welfare," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(11), pages 1364-1377, November.
  4. Don Kenkel & Alan Mathios & Grace Phillips & Revathy Surya Narayana & Hua Wang & Sen Zeng, 2026. "The Impact of Tobacco Regulations on Smoking and Vaping," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 92(4), pages 956-972, April.
  5. Buckell, John & Hancock, Thomas & Forde, Hannah & Bandy, Lauren & Jensen, Henning & Keogh-Brown, Marcus & Amies-Cull, Ben & Bica, Margarida & Taylor, Sian & Thomas, Owen & Ward, Jane & Rayner, Mike & , 2026. "Characterising public opinion for food-based fiscal policies in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 401(C).
  6. Sun, Sizhong, 2022. "The demand for a COVID-19 vaccine," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
  7. Wang, Yu & Hancock, Thomas O. & Wang, Yacan & Choudhury, Charisma, 2025. "Modelling residential relocation behaviour combining passive revealed preference data and stated preference survey data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
  8. John Buckell & Vrinda Vasavada & Sarah Wordsworth & Dean A. Regier & Matthew Quaife, 2022. "Utility maximization versus regret minimization in health choice behavior: Evidence from four datasets," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 363-381, February.
  9. Ce Shang & James Nonnemaker & Kymberle Sterling & Jessica Sobolewski & Scott R. Weaver, 2021. "Impact of Little Cigars and Cigarillos Packaging Features on Product Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-13, October.
  10. Scott, Anthony & Witt, Julia, 2020. "Loss aversion, reference dependence and diminishing sensitivity in choice experiments," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
  11. Don Kenkel & Alan Mathios & Grace Phillips & Revathy Suryanarayana & Hua Wang & Sen Zeng, 2026. "Just what the doctor ordered? The benefits and costs of e‐cigarette regulation in Australia," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 97(1), pages 109-126, March.
  12. Moeinaddini, Amin & Habibian, Meeghat, 2026. "Accounting for the uncertainty in an analysis of travel choice experiments using a hybrid choice model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
  13. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
  14. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
  15. Frimpong, Jemima A. & Helleringer, Stephane, 2020. "Financial Incentives for Downloading COVID–19 Digital Contact Tracing Apps," SocArXiv 9vp7x, Center for Open Science.
  16. Moeinaddini, Amin & Habibian, Meeghat, 2023. "Transportation demand management policy efficiency: An attempt to address the effectiveness and acceptability of policy packages," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 317-330.
  17. John Buckell & Alice Wreford & Matthew Quaife & Thomas O. Hancock, 2025. "A Break from the Norm? Parametric Representations of Preference Heterogeneity for Discrete Choice Models in Health," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 45(8), pages 987-1001, November.
  18. Milad Haghani & Michiel C. J. Bliemer & John M. Rose & Harmen Oppewal & Emily Lancsar, 2021. "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Macro-scale analysis of literature and effectiveness of bias mitigation methods," Papers 2102.02945, arXiv.org.
  19. Daniel P. Bigelow & Margaret Jodlowski, 2026. "Nonclassical measurement error in farmland markets with implications for Ricardian analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 108(2), pages 599-629, March.
  20. David A. J. Meester & Stephane Hess & John Buckell & Thomas O. Hancock, 2023. "Can decision field theory enhance our understanding of health‐based choices? Evidence from risky health behaviors," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1710-1732, August.
  21. Shaoying Ma & Sooa Ahn & Hojin Park & Qian Yang & John F. P. Bridges & Ce Shang, 2026. "How do US Adults Who Vape Choose Among Different E‐Cigarette (EC) Models and Cigarettes in Response to Prices and Taxes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 1104-1117, July.
  22. John Buckell & David A Hensher & Stephane Hess, 2021. "Kicking the habit is hard: A hybrid choice model investigation into the role of addiction in smoking behavior," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 3-19, January.
  23. repec:osf:socarx:9vp7x_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
  24. Moeinaddini, Amin & Habibian, Meeghat & Zou, Yajie & Zhang, Tianren & Li, Linbo, 2026. "Assessing acceptability of push-pull TDM policy packages: Integrating objective and subjective factors via hybrid choice modeling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  25. Ebad Allah Jahanabadi & Seyed Nematolla Mousavi & Mohammad Hashem Moosavihaghighi & Mohammad Reza Eslami, 2024. "Consumers’ willingness to pay for antibiotic-free chicken meat: application of contingent valuation method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25151-25172, October.
  26. Kaat de Corte & John Cairns & Richard Grieve, 2021. "Stated versus revealed preferences: An approach to reduce bias," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1095-1123, May.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.