IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login

Citations for "Inequality Reducing Properties of Composite Taxation"

by Le Breton, Michel & Moyes, Patrick & Trannoy, Alain

For a complete description of this item, click here. For a RSS feed for citations of this item, click here.
as in new window

  1. Ayfer Karayel, 2006. "The intragenerationally redistributive effects of the retirement insurance scheme in Turkey before and after the 1999 reform," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 441-448.
  2. Juan D. Moreno-Ternero, 2010. "Voting over piece-wise linear tax methods," Working Papers 10.02, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
  3. JU, Biung-Ghi & MORENO-TERNERO, Juan D., 2006. "Progressivity, inequality reduction and merging-proofness in taxation," CORE Discussion Papers 2006075, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
  4. Damjanovic, Tatiana, 2005. "Lorenz dominance for transformed income distributions: A simple proof," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 234-237, September.
  5. Tatiana Damjanovic & David Ulph, 2007. "Tax Progressivity, Income Distribution and Tax Non-Compliance," Discussion Paper Series, Department of Economics 200712, Department of Economics, University of St. Andrews.
  6. Alain Trannoy, 2002. "Internet, Literacy and Earnings Inequality," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 68(1), pages 125-147.
  7. Tatiana Damjanovic, 2005. "A Simple Proof of Lorenz Dominance Criterion," CRIEFF Discussion Papers 0505, Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm.
  8. Patrick Moyes & Alain Trannoy, 1999. "Le quotient familial : une structure fiscale cohérente avec le critère de Lorenz relatif," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 138(2), pages 111-124.
  9. Marat Ibragimov & Rustam Ibragimov, 2007. "Market Demand Elasticity and Income Inequality," Economic Theory, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 579-587, September.
  10. Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau & Humberto Llavador, 2015. "Inequality reducing properties of progressive income tax schedules: The case of endogenous income," Economics Working Papers 1492, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  11. Carbonell, O. & Klor, E., 2000. "Representative Democracy and Marginal Rate Progressive Income Taxation," Working Papers 00-12, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
  12. Kampas, Athanasios & Mamalis, Spyridon, 2006. "Assessing the Distributional Impacts of Transferable Pollution Permits: The Case of Phosphorus Pollution Management at a River Basin Scale," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 7(2), August.
  13. Davies, James B. & Hoy, Michael, 2002. "Flat rate taxes and inequality measurement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 33-46, April.
  14. Benabou, R. & Ok, E.A., 2000. "Mobility as Progressivity: Ranking Income Processes According to Equality of Opportunity," Papers 211, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Public and International Affairs.
  15. Moyes, Patrick, 2003. "Redistributive effects of minimal equal sacrifice taxation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 111-140, January.
  16. Eugenio Peluso & Alain Trannoy, 2005. "Do redistributive schemes reduce inequality between individuals?," Working Papers 26/2005, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
  17. Tatiana Damjanovic, 2005. "Does More Progressive Tax Make Tax Discipline Weaker?," CRIEFF Discussion Papers 0506, Centre for Research into Industry, Enterprise, Finance and the Firm.
  18. Deb, Rajat & Razzolini, Laura & Seo, Tae Kun, 2003. "Strategy-proof cost sharing, ability to pay and free provision of an indivisible public good," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 205-227, April.
  19. Ronny Aboudi & Dominique Thon, 2010. "Characterizations of egalitarian binary relations as transitive closures with a special reference to Lorenz dominance and to single-crossing conditions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 575-593, October.
This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.