IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/udeicb/18.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rekonstruktion der historischen Entwicklung der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Schritte der Institutionalisierung, Diskussionen zum Status, Rahmenempfehlungen für die Lehre

Author

Listed:
  • Schauer, Carola

Abstract

Dieser Forschungsbericht entstand im Rahmen des von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft geförderten Projektes IFWIS (Internationaler Vergleich der Forschungsprogramme von Wirtschaftsinformatik und Information Systems), welches auf den Vergleich der Disziplinen Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI) und Information Systems (im nordamerikanischen Raum) zielt. Vor diesem Hintergrund ist dieser Bericht auf eine deskriptive Rekonstruktion der historischen Entwicklung des Fachs Wirtschaftsinformatik seit den 1950er Jahren gerichtet. Dazu wird entsprechend früherer Ergebnisse des IFWISProjekts auf ausgewählte Forschungsfragen zur Ausrichtung und zum Erfolg der Disziplin fokussiert. Zur Beantwortung dieser Fragen werden im Rahmen einer Literaturanalyse drei grundlegende Aspekte der historischen Entwicklung untersucht: (1) die Institutionalisierung des Fachs an Universitäten und auf Verbandsebene, sowie wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften und Konferenzen; (2) Diskussionen zum Status der Disziplin bzw. zu Schwierigkeiten und Herausforderungen; (3) Rahmenempfehlungen zur Universitätsausbildung als Indikator für die Ausrichtung und den Reifegrad des Fachs in der Lehre. Als Ergebnis der Analyse - und gestützt durch weitere Arbeiten aus dem Kontext des IFWIS-Projekts - werden Thesen zur Entwicklung und zum Status der Wirtschaftsinformatik formuliert. Abschließend wird auf Basis dieser Thesen ein Vergleich zum nordamerikanischen Information Systems vorgenommen.

Suggested Citation

  • Schauer, Carola, 2007. "Rekonstruktion der historischen Entwicklung der Wirtschaftsinformatik: Schritte der Institutionalisierung, Diskussionen zum Status, Rahmenempfehlungen für die Lehre," ICB Research Reports 18, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:udeicb:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/58174/1/715967800.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schauer, Carola & Schmeing, Tobias, 2007. "Development of IS teaching in North-America: An analysis of model curricula," ICB Research Reports 17, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    2. Daniel Robey, 1996. "Research Commentary: Diversity in Information Systems Research: Threat, Promise, and Responsibility," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 400-408, December.
    3. Steven John Simon & S. Michael Wang, 1999. "The Current Status of the IS Discipline: A Survey of American and International Business Schools," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 12(2), pages 5-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stefan Strecker & Herbert Kargl, 2009. "Integration Deficits of IT Controlling," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(3), pages 204-212, June.
    2. Arnold Picot & Oliver Baumann, 2009. "The Relevance of Organization Theory to the Field of Business and Information Systems Engineering," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(1), pages 62-69, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rivera González Gibrán & Cox Andrew M. & Flores Zambada Ricardo, 2012. "A human resources project implementation An actor-network theory perspective," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 57(3), pages 9-39, julio-sep.
    2. Joseph S. Valacich & Mark A. Fuller & Christoph Schneider & Alan R. Dennis, 2006. "Issues and Opinions---Publication Opportunities in Premier Business Outlets: How Level Is the Playing Field?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 107-125, June.
    3. Erastus Karanja & Aditya Sharma & Ibrahim Salama, 2020. "What does MIS survey research reveal about diversity and representativeness in the MIS field? A content analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(3), pages 1583-1628, March.
    4. Monideepa Tarafdar & Guohou Shan & Jason Bennett Thatcher & Alok Gupta, 2022. "Intellectual Diversity in IS Research: Discipline-Based Conceptualization and an Illustration from Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1490-1510, December.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4899 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Cédric Denis-Remis & Olivier Codou & Jean-Fabrice Lebraty, 2010. "Green IT, China - France: similar reactions?," Post-Print halshs-00797320, HAL.
    7. Robin Williams & Neil Pollock, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Moving Beyond the Single Site Implementation Study: How (and Why) We Should Study the Biography of Packaged Enterprise Solutions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 1-22, March.
    8. Goles, Tim & Hirschheim, Rudy, 2000. "The paradigm is dead, the paradigm is dead...long live the paradigm: the legacy of Burrell and Morgan," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 249-268, June.
    9. Roberts, Robin W. & Wallace, Dana M., 2015. "Sustaining diversity in social and environmental accounting research," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 78-87.
    10. Mihail Cocosila & Alexander Serenko & Ofir Turel, 2011. "Exploring the management information systems discipline: a scientometric study of ICIS, PACIS and ASAC," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(1), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Avgerou, Chrisanthi, 2000. "Information systems: what sort of science is it?," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 567-579, October.
    12. David G. Schwartz, 2014. "Research Commentary ---The Disciplines of Information: Lessons from the History of the Discipline of Medicine," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 205-221, June.
    13. Lange, Carola, 2005. "Development and Status of the Information Systems / Wirtschaftsinformatik Discipline. An Interpretive Evaluation of Interviews with Renowned Researchers: Part II - Results Information Systems Discipli," ICB Research Reports 3, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    14. John Mingers, 2001. "Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 240-259, September.
    15. Andrew Burton-Jones & Detmar W. Straub, 2006. "Reconceptualizing System Usage: An Approach and Empirical Test," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 228-246, September.
    16. Schauer, Carola & Schmeing, Tobias, 2007. "Development of IS teaching in North-America: An analysis of model curricula," ICB Research Reports 17, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    17. Schauer, Carola, 2007. "Relevance and success of IS teaching and research: An analysis of the "Relevance Debate"," ICB Research Reports 19, University Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Computer Science and Business Information Systems (ICB).
    18. Thomas F. Burgess & Paul Grimshaw & Nicky E. Shaw, 2017. "Research Commentary—Diversity of the Information Systems Research Field: A Journal Governance Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 5-21, March.
    19. Jörg Becker & Jan Brocke & Marcel Heddier & Stefan Seidel, 2015. "In Search of Information Systems (Grand) Challenges," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 57(6), pages 377-390, December.
    20. Bernard Fallery & Florence Rodhain, 2009. "Management Information Systems : the Journey of a Research Field," Post-Print hal-00777795, HAL.
    21. Katharina Steininger & René Riedl & Friedrich Roithmayr & Peter Mertens, 2009. "Fads and Trends in Business and Information Systems Engineering and Information Systems Research – A Comparative Literature Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 1(6), pages 411-428, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:udeicb:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwessde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.