IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb649/sfb649dp2017-020.html

Pricing Green Financial Products

Author

Listed:
  • Melzer, Awdesch
  • Härdle, Wolfgang Karl
  • López Cabrera, Brenda

Abstract

With increasing wind power penetration more and more volatile and weather dependent energy is fed into the German electricity system. To manage the risk of windless days and transfer revenue risk from wind turbine owners to investors wind power derivatives were introduced. These insurance-like securities (ILS) allow to hedge the risk of unstable wind power production on exchanges like Nasdaq and European Energy Exchange. These products have been priced before using risk neutral pricing techniques. We present a modern and powerful methodology to model weather derivatives with very skewed underlyings incorporating techniques from extreme event modelling to tune seasonal volatility and compare transformed Gaussian and non-Gaussian CARMA(p; q) models. Our results indicate that the transformed Gaussian CARMA(p; q) model is preferred over the non-Gaussian alternative with Lévy increments. Out-of-sample backtesting results show good performance wrt burn analysis employing smooth Market Price of Risk (MPR) estimates based on NASDAQ weekly and monthly German wind power futures prices and German wind power utilisation as underlying. A seasonal MPR of a smile-shape is observed, with positive values in times of high volatility, e.g. winter months, and negative values, in times of low volatility and production, e.g. in summer months. We conclude that producers pay premiums to insure stable revenue steams, while investors pay premiums when weather risk is high.

Suggested Citation

  • Melzer, Awdesch & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & López Cabrera, Brenda, 2017. "Pricing Green Financial Products," SFB 649 Discussion Papers 2017-020, Humboldt University Berlin, Collaborative Research Center 649: Economic Risk.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2017-020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/169210/1/SFB649DP2017-020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Groll, Andreas & López-Cabrera, Brenda & Meyer-Brandis, Thilo, 2016. "A consistent two-factor model for pricing temperature derivatives," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 112-126.
    2. Aigner, D J & Amemiya, Takeshi & Poirier, Dale J, 1976. "On the Estimation of Production Frontiers: Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Parameters of a Discontinuous Density Function," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 17(2), pages 377-396, June.
    3. Newey, Whitney K & Powell, James L, 1987. "Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 819-847, July.
    4. Gersema, Gerke & Wozabal, David, 2017. "An equilibrium pricing model for wind power futures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 64-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2017-020 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wolfgang Karl Härdle & Brenda López Cabrera & Awdesch Melzer, 2021. "Pricing wind power futures," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1083-1102, August.
    3. Litimein, Ouahiba & Laksaci, Ali & Mechab, Boubaker & Bouzebda, Salim, 2023. "Local linear estimate of the functional expectile regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Min Ren & Shengli Zhao & Mingqiu Wang & Xinbei Zhu, 2024. "Robust optimal subsampling based on weighted asymmetric least squares," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(4), pages 2221-2251, June.
    5. Richard Gerlach & Declan Walpole & Chao Wang, 2017. "Semi-parametric Bayesian tail risk forecasting incorporating realized measures of volatility," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 199-215, February.
    6. Giuseppe Storti & Chao Wang, 2023. "Modeling uncertainty in financial tail risk: A forecast combination and weighted quantile approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1648-1663, November.
    7. Wang, Bingling & Li, Yingxing & Härdle, Wolfgang Karl, 2022. "K-expectiles clustering," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Zhao, Jun & Chen, Yingyu & Zhang, Yi, 2018. "Expectile regression for analyzing heteroscedasticity in high dimension," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 304-311.
    9. Lina Liao & Cheolwoo Park & Hosik Choi, 2019. "Penalized expectile regression: an alternative to penalized quantile regression," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 71(2), pages 409-438, April.
    10. Zhang, Feipeng & Li, Qunhua, 2017. "A continuous threshold expectile model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 49-66.
    11. Kneib, Thomas & Silbersdorff, Alexander & Säfken, Benjamin, 2023. "Rage Against the Mean – A Review of Distributional Regression Approaches," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 99-123.
    12. Storti, Giuseppe & Wang, Chao, 2022. "Nonparametric expected shortfall forecasting incorporating weighted quantiles," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 224-239.
    13. Collin Philipps, 2022. "Interpreting Expectiles," Working Papers 2022-01, Department of Economics and Geosciences, US Air Force Academy.
    14. Denis Chetverikov & Jesper R.-V. Sørensen, 2021. "Analytic and Bootstrap-after-Cross-Validation Methods for Selecting Penalty Parameters of High-Dimensional M-Estimators," Discussion Papers 21-04, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    15. Garcia-Jorcano, Laura & Sanchis-Marco, Lidia, 2021. "Systemic-systematic risk in financial system: A dynamic ranking based on expectiles," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 330-365.
    16. Laura Garcia‐Jorcano & Lidia Sanchis‐Marco, 2025. "Measuring the Impact of Transition Risk on Financial Markets: A Joint VaR‐ES Approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 1907-1945, September.
    17. Litimein, Ouahiba & Laksaci, Ali & Ait-Hennani, Larbi & Mechab, Boubaker & Rachdi, Mustapha, 2024. "Asymptotic normality of the local linear estimator of the functional expectile regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Jun Zhao & Guan’ao Yan & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Robust estimation and shrinkage in ultrahigh dimensional expectile regression with heavy tails and variance heterogeneity," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 1-28, February.
    19. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2015-047 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Bernardi, Mauro & Bottone, Marco & Petrella, Lea, 2018. "Bayesian quantile regression using the skew exponential power distribution," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 92-111.
    21. Belkacem Abdous & Bruno Remillard, 1995. "Relating quantiles and expectiles under weighted-symmetry," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 47(2), pages 371-384, June.
    22. Richard Gerlach & Chao Wang, 2016. "Bayesian Semi-parametric Realized-CARE Models for Tail Risk Forecasting Incorporating Realized Measures," Papers 1612.08488, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb649:sfb649dp2017-020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sohubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.