IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/sfb597/162.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Politikpositionen im Reformprozess des öffentlichen Dienstes: Zur Übertragbarkeit der quantitativen Textanalyse

Author

Listed:
  • Marcinkiewicz, Kamil
  • Auffenberg, Jennie
  • Kittel, Bernhard

Abstract

Der Aufsatz befasst sich mit der Übertragung eines Verfahrens der Quantitativen Inhaltsanalyse, das für die Untersuchung ideologischer Texte entwickelt wurde und hier auf die Diskussion seitens der Arbeitgeber- und Arbeitnehmervertretung zum Reformprozess des öffentlichen Dienstes in Deutschland angewendet wird. Es werden theoretische Argumente vorgestellt, die für die Anwendbarkeit des räumlichen Modells der Politik auf die Bestimmung der Positionen der Interessenvertretungen sprechen. Des Weiteren wird eine empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel des Polizeisektors auf Länderebene durchgeführt. Die Analyse der aus der Mitgliederzeitschrift der Gewerkschaft der Polizei und der Publikationen des Innenministeriums des Landes Brandenburg entnommenen Kommentare ermöglicht die Bestimmung von Politikpositionen im Zeitverlauf, die mit den Erkenntnissen anderer Studien übereinstimmen.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcinkiewicz, Kamil & Auffenberg, Jennie & Kittel, Bernhard, 2012. "Politikpositionen im Reformprozess des öffentlichen Dienstes: Zur Übertragbarkeit der quantitativen Textanalyse," TranState Working Papers 162, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/56048/1/68869439X.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Downs, 1957. "An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 65(2), pages 135-135.
    2. A. Smithies, 1941. "Optimum Location in Spatial Competition," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(3), pages 423-423.
    3. Martin, Lanny W. & Vanberg, Georg, 2008. "A Robust Transformation Procedure for Interpreting Political Text," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 93-100, January.
    4. Hils, Sylvia & Streb, Sebastian, 2010. "Vom Staatsdiener zum Dienstleister? Veränderungen öffentlicher Beschäftigungssysteme in Deutschland, Großbritannien, Frankreich und Schweden," TranState Working Papers 111, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    5. Jonathan B. Slapin & Sven‐Oliver Proksch, 2008. "A Scaling Model for Estimating Time‐Series Party Positions from Texts," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(3), pages 705-722, July.
    6. Heike Klüver, 2009. "Measuring Interest Group Influence Using Quantitative Text Analysis," European Union Politics, , vol. 10(4), pages 535-549, December.
    7. Benoit, Kenneth & Laver, Michael, 2008. "Compared to What? A Comment on “A Robust Transformation Procedure for Interpreting Political Text” by Martin and Vanberg," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 101-111, January.
    8. Laver, Michael & Benoit, Kenneth & Garry, John, 2003. "Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 97(2), pages 311-331, May.
    9. Kenneth Benoit & Michael Laver & Slava Mikhaylov, 2009. "Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(2), pages 495-513, April.
    10. Martin, Lanny W. & Vanberg, Georg, 2008. "Reply to Benoit and Laver," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 112-114, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Auffenberg, Jennie & Marcinkiewicz, Kamil, 2013. "Wer gestaltet, wer verwaltet Reformen im öffentlichen Dienst? Ein Methodenvergleich zur Analyse von Arbeitsbeziehungen in Reformprozessen anhand der Polizei Brandenburg," TranState Working Papers 170, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    2. Hanna Bäck & Marc Debus & Wolfgang C. Müller, 2016. "Intra-party diversity and ministerial selection in coalition governments," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 355-378, March.
    3. Pierre-Marc Daigneault & Dominic Duval & Louis M. Imbeau, 2018. "Supervised scaling of semi-structured interview transcripts to characterize the ideology of a social policy reform," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 2151-2162, September.
    4. André Krouwel & Annemarie Elfrinkhof, 2014. "Combining strengths of methods of party positioning to counter their weaknesses: the development of a new methodology to calibrate parties on issues and ideological dimensions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1455-1472, May.
    5. Armèn Hakhverdian, 2009. "Capturing Government Policy on the Left–Right Scale: Evidence from the United Kingdom, 1956–2006," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 57(4), pages 720-745, December.
    6. Osterloh, Steffen, 2012. "Words speak louder than actions: The impact of politics on economic performance," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 318-336.
    7. Marc Debus, 2009. "Pre-electoral commitments and government formation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 45-64, January.
    8. Born, Andreas & Janssen, Aljoscha, 2022. "Does a district mandate matter for the behavior of politicians? An analysis of roll-call votes and parliamentary speeches," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Anna Calissano & Simone Vantini & Marika Arena, 2020. "Monitoring rare categories in sentiment and opinion analysis: a Milan mega event on Twitter platform," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 29(4), pages 787-812, December.
    10. Pongsak Luangaram & Yuthana Sethapramote, 2016. "Central Bank Communication and Monetary Policy Effectiveness: Evidence from Thailand," PIER Discussion Papers 20, Puey Ungphakorn Institute for Economic Research.
    11. Alessandro Morselli, 2021. "Individual decisions and collective choices in the history of economic thought," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 3, pages 77-96,97-11.
    12. Enriqueta Aragonès & Dimitrios Xefteris, 2017. "Imperfectly Informed Voters And Strategic Extremism," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 58(2), pages 439-471, May.
    13. Martin Haselmayer & Marcelo Jenny, 2017. "Sentiment analysis of political communication: combining a dictionary approach with crowdcoding," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2623-2646, November.
    14. Tanner, Thomas Cole, 1994. "The spatial theory of elections: an analysis of voters' predictive dimensions and recovery of the underlying issue space," ISU General Staff Papers 1994010108000018174, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    15. Marcelin Joanis, 2011. "The road to power: partisan loyalty and the centralized provision of local infrastructure," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 117-143, January.
    16. Diaf, Sami & Döpke, Jörg & Fritsche, Ulrich & Rockenbach, Ida, 2022. "Sharks and minnows in a shoal of words: Measuring latent ideological positions based on text mining techniques," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    17. Fournier, Gaëtan & Van Der Straeten, Karine & Weibull, Jörgen W., 2020. "Spatial competition with unit-demand functions," TSE Working Papers 20-1072, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    18. Melvin J. Hinich & Michael C. Munger, 1992. "A Spatial Theory of Ideology," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 5-30, January.
    19. Protte, Benjamin, 2012. "Does Fleet Street shape politics? Estimating the Effect of Newspaper Coverage about Globalization on the Support for Unemployment Insurance," Working Papers 12-19, University of Mannheim, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:sfb597:162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zesbrde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.