IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/jhtiwp/343568.html

Policy coherence for a sustainable land use governance: The effectiveness and implementation of land use policies in Brazil and the role of the Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR)

Author

Listed:
  • Salomão, Caroline
  • Fischer, Richard

Abstract

Achieving sustainable land-use governance in tropical commodity-producing countries requires coherent policy frameworks capable of balancing agricultural production, forest conservation, climate mitigation, and rural development. In Brazil, the implementation of the European Union Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR) introduces new opportunities and challenges by linking market access to legality, traceability, and deforestation-free production. This study evaluates the coherence of Brazil's land-use governance framework and examines how the EUDR may influence the effectiveness and implementation of existing policy instruments. A mixed-methods approach combined a systematic review of more than 100 national laws, decrees, plans, and private initiatives with policy network analysis, and 45 semi-structured interviews involving representatives from government, academia, civil society, producer organizations, financial institutions, and the private sector. Operational policy instruments were grouped into 11 categories, and stakeholders assessed their effectiveness, implementation status, and the expected implications of the EUDR. Results show that Brazil has a diversified institutional framework for sustainable land-use governance, but important implementation gaps persist. While national policies emphasize conservation, climate, and forest production, stakeholders perceive conventional agriculture as the dominant force shaping current land use. Land registration, monitoring, private land regularization, public forest governance, and measures to combat illegality emerged as the most central and effective policy instruments, although their implementation remains constrained by institutional fragmentation and limited enforcement capacity. Due diligence and traceability instruments are already well integrated into the governance framework, highlighting strong complementarities with EUDR requirements. Although it's direct contribution to reducing deforestation is expected to be limited, stakeholders predominantly perceive the EUDR as an important catalyst for improving policy coherence and reinforcing Brazil's existing governance architecture toward more sustainable and deforestation-free supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Salomão, Caroline & Fischer, Richard, 2026. "Policy coherence for a sustainable land use governance: The effectiveness and implementation of land use policies in Brazil and the role of the Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR)," Thünen Working Papers 295, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:343568
    DOI: 10.3220/253-2026-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343568/1/1983080551.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3220/253-2026-189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:343568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vtigvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.