IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/jhtiwp/343568.html

Policy coherence for a sustainable land use governance: The effectiveness and implementation of land use policies in Brazil and the role of the Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR)

Author

Listed:
  • Salomão, Caroline
  • Fischer, Richard

Abstract

Achieving sustainable land-use governance in tropical commodity-producing countries requires coherent policy frameworks capable of balancing agricultural production, forest conservation, climate mitigation, and rural development. In Brazil, the implementation of the European Union Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR) introduces new opportunities and challenges by linking market access to legality, traceability, and deforestation-free production. This study evaluates the coherence of Brazil's land-use governance framework and examines how the EUDR may influence the effectiveness and implementation of existing policy instruments. A mixed-methods approach combined a systematic review of more than 100 national laws, decrees, plans, and private initiatives with policy network analysis, and 45 semi-structured interviews involving representatives from government, academia, civil society, producer organizations, financial institutions, and the private sector. Operational policy instruments were grouped into 11 categories, and stakeholders assessed their effectiveness, implementation status, and the expected implications of the EUDR. Results show that Brazil has a diversified institutional framework for sustainable land-use governance, but important implementation gaps persist. While national policies emphasize conservation, climate, and forest production, stakeholders perceive conventional agriculture as the dominant force shaping current land use. Land registration, monitoring, private land regularization, public forest governance, and measures to combat illegality emerged as the most central and effective policy instruments, although their implementation remains constrained by institutional fragmentation and limited enforcement capacity. Due diligence and traceability instruments are already well integrated into the governance framework, highlighting strong complementarities with EUDR requirements. Although it's direct contribution to reducing deforestation is expected to be limited, stakeholders predominantly perceive the EUDR as an important catalyst for improving policy coherence and reinforcing Brazil's existing governance architecture toward more sustainable and deforestation-free supply chains.

Suggested Citation

  • Salomão, Caroline & Fischer, Richard, 2026. "Policy coherence for a sustainable land use governance: The effectiveness and implementation of land use policies in Brazil and the role of the Deforestation-Free Products Regulation (EUDR)," Thünen Working Papers 295, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:343568
    DOI: 10.3220/253-2026-189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343568/1/1983080551.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3220/253-2026-189?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric F. Lambin & Holly K. Gibbs & Robert Heilmayr & Kimberly M. Carlson & Leonardo C. Fleck & Rachael D. Garrett & Yann le Polain de Waroux & Constance L. McDermott & David McLaughlin & Peter Newton &, 2018. "The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 109-116, February.
    2. Roberto Toto & Jennifer Alix-García & Katharine R. E. Sims & Bruno Coutinho & Carlos Muñoz Brenes & Ludmila Pugliese & Alex Fernando Mendes, 2025. "Evidence on scaling forest restoration from the Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eusebius Pantja Pramudya & Lukas Rumboko Wibowo & Fitri Nurfatriani & Iman Kasiman Nawireja & Dewi Ratna Kurniasari & Sakti Hutabarat & Yohanes Berenika Kadarusman & Ananda Oemi Iswardhani & Rukaiyah , 2022. "Incentives for Palm Oil Smallholders in Mandatory Certification in Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. repec:osf:socarx:n9dhz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ana Beatriz Santos & Marcos Heil Costa, 2018. "Do Large Slaughterhouses Promote Sustainable Intensification of Cattle Ranching in Amazonia and the Cerrado?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-28, September.
    4. le Polain de Waroux, Yann & Kronenburg García, Angela, 2025. "“Dream brokers” and the moral economy of frontier investments," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Garrett, R.D. & Grabs, J. & Cammelli, F. & Gollnow, F. & Levy, S.A., 2022. "Should payments for environmental services be used to implement zero-deforestation supply chain policies? The case of soy in the Brazilian Cerrado," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    6. Nophea Sasaki & Issei Abe, 2025. "A Digital Twin Architecture for Forest Restoration: Integrating AI, IoT, and Blockchain for Smart Ecosystem Management," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, September.
    7. Muradian, Roldan & Cahyafitri, Raras & Ferrando, Tomaso & Grottera, Carolina & Jardim-Wanderley, Luiz & Krause, Torsten & Kurniawan, Nanang I. & Loft, Lasse & Nurshafira, Tadzkia & Prabawati-Suwito, D, 2025. "Will the EU deforestation-free products regulation (EUDR) reduce tropical forest loss? Insights from three producer countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Siewers, Samuel & Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada & Baghdadi, Leila, 2024. "Global value chains and firms’ environmental performance," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    9. Augusto Carlos Castro-Nunez & Ma. Eliza J. Villarino & Vincent Bax & Raphael Ganzenmüller & Wendy Francesconi, 2021. "Broadening the Perspective of Zero-Deforestation Interventions in Peru by Incorporating Concepts from the Global Value Chain Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    10. Booth, Hollie & Milner-Gulland, E.J. & Starkey, Malcolm, 2023. "Operationalizing transformative change for business in the context of nature positive," OSF Preprints vk2hq, Center for Open Science.
    11. Gasparinetti, Pedro & Wunder, Sven & Bakker, Leonardo & Gomes, Fernanda D., 2026. "Adverse selection and severe design constraints in PES: A choice experiment in a deforestation hotspot of the Brazilian Cerrado," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    12. Nelson Villoria & Rachael Garrett & Florian Gollnow & Kimberly Carlson, 2022. "Leakage does not fully offset soy supply-chain efforts to reduce deforestation in Brazil," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Aravena, Claudia & Castillo, Natalia & Ehrlich, Marco & Taou, Nadia & Wagner, Thomas, 2022. "Agroforestry Programs in the Colombian Amazon: Selection, Treatment and Exposure Effects on Deforestation," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 537, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.
    14. Bruckner, Martin & Wood, Richard & Moran, Daniel & Kuschnig, Nikolas & Wieland, Hanspeter & Maus, Victor & Börner, Jan, 2019. "FABIO - The Construction of the Food and Agriculture Biomass Input-Output Model," Ecological Economic Papers 27, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    15. Michele M. O. Pereira & Minelle E. Silva & Linda C. Hendry, 2023. "Developing global supplier competences for supply chain sustainability: The effects of institutional pressures on certification adoption," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4244-4265, November.
    16. Falcone, Stefano & Rosenberg, Michele, 2025. "Agricultural modernization and redistributive conflict," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    17. Cosimo, Luiz Henrique Elias & Masiero, Mauro & Mammadova, Aynur & Pettenella, Davide, 2024. "Voluntary sustainability standards to cope with the new European Union regulation on deforestation-free products: A gap analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    18. Watts, John D. & Pasaribu, Katryn & Irawan, Silvia & Tacconi, Luca & Martanila, Heni & Wiratama, Cokorda Gde Wisnu & Musthofa, Fauzan Kemal & Sugiarto, Bernadinus Steni & Manvi, Utami Putri, 2021. "Challenges faced by smallholders in achieving sustainable palm oil certification in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    19. Cesar de Oliveira, Susan E.M. & Nakagawa, Louise & Lopes, Gabriela Russo & Visentin, Jaqueline C. & Couto, Matheus & Silva, Daniel E. & d'Albertas, Francisco & Pavani, Bruna F. & Loyola, Rafael & West, 2024. "The European Union and United Kingdom's deforestation-free supply chains regulations: Implications for Brazil," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    20. Lyons-White, Joss & Zodua, Philip A. & Mikolo Yobo, Christian & Carlon, Solomon C. & Ewers, Robert M. & Knight, Andrew T., 2025. "Challenges for implementing zero deforestation commitments in a highly forested country: Perspectives from Liberia’s palm oil sector," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    21. Axel Marx & Charline Depoorter & Santiago Fernandez de Cordoba & Rupal Verma & Mercedes Araoz & Graeme Auld & Janne Bemelmans & Elizabeth A. Bennett & Eva Boonaert & Clara Brandi & Thomas Dietz & Eve , 2024. "Global governance through voluntary sustainability standards: Developments, trends and challenges," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(4), pages 708-728, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jhtiwp:343568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vtigvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.