IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/itsb24/302467.html

Analysis of changes in purchase intention of electric vehicles due to the spread of ICT-based sharing and reservations for in-town recharging facilities

Author

Listed:
  • Manaka, Kyoko
  • Kikuchi, Hinata
  • Nakamura, Akihiro

Abstract

Efforts to promote the widespread adoption of electric vehicles (EVs), which contribute to the realization of a carbon-neutral society, are being discussed. According to the Japan Automobile Dealers Association, the share of EVs in new passenger car sales was approximately 1.16% in the period ending December 2024, with a total share of about 1.85%. Past surveys related to Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs)indicate that factors such as driving range and vehicle specifications, as well as the availability of charging facilities, are key to their widespread adoption (Pysalska et al., 2022; Phillipsen et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2017; Kudoh and Motose, 2010). There are different types of EV charging facilities, such as regular recharging facilities which take several hours to charge for a 100 km drive and fast charging facilities which take about 30 minutes to charge for a 100 km drive. The installation cost of the former is relatively low, and it can be installed in individual homes using subsidies. In contrast, the installation cost of the latter ranges from 10 to 20 million yen, making it impractical for individual homes and used by the public in a manner similar to current gasoline stations. Additionally, there are Super-fast charging facilities called Superchargers, dedicated to Tesla vehicles, which allow significantly faster charging than fast charging facilities. Currently, fast charging facilities are mainly installed in locations such as automobile dealerships, convenience stores, roadside stations, and expressways (SA/PA), with 40% of installations at automobile dealerships, while only 10% are at convenience stores and roadside stations/highways (Source: March 2023, e-mobility power charging spot list). On the other hand, regular recharging facilities are installed mainly in destinations with long stay times such as hotels and shopping malls, in addition to individual home installations. The necessity for adequate recharging facilities is evident as BEV usage can only become widespread if users have convenient access to recharging options. In Japan, over 29,000 recharging facilities exist, with approximately 70% being regular recharging facilities and 30% being fast recharging facilities. It is relatively easy to install in detached houses but challenging in apartment buildings. According to the "Housing and Land Statistics Survey" by the Statistics Bureau of Japan in 2018, 53.6% of households live in detached houses, and 43.5% live in apartment buildings, with the percentage of apartment dwellers reaching 71% in Tokyo. This higher ratio in urban areas presents a challenge to the widespread installation of charging facilities. While installing regular recharging facilities in individual homes is relatively easy, in apartment-type residences, it is necessary to obtain approval from the residents' association, which is organized by the inhabitants, to install charging facilities in communal parking areas. these households face significant constraints in installing personal recharging stations in their parking spaces. This is one reason why apartment dwellers hesitate to purchase BEVs. Charging facilities remain idle when not in use and are suitable for shared use. In fact, public fast recharging facilities are used as shared infrastructure. While regular recharging facilities are generally installed in individual homes and are not typically considered for shared use, the advancement of ICT and the widespread ownership of smartphones suggest that shared use of regular recharging facilities in individual homes would be quite feasible. Previous studies highlight the critical role of ICT in optimizing various services and systems, including transportation. For instance, Benevolo et al. (2016) and Jittrapirom et al. (2017) emphasize how ICT can enhance smart mobility and user-centered mobility services. Breidbach and Brodie (2017) discuss the sharing economy's reliance on ICT for facilitating value co-creation and engagement. Billhardt et al. (2019) demonstrate how ICT improves the matching efficiency of cab dispatch services. These studies would indicate that ICT may contribute the matching efficiency of recharging facilities online. In Japan, currently, it is possible to search for recharging facilities online, but there are not many facilities that can be reserved via apps. If recharging facilities become more widely available, and if it becomes possible to check their real-time availability and make reservations using a smartphone app, this is likely to increase the willingness to purchase EVs. Especially in Japanese urban areas with a high ratio of apartment dwellers, the efficient use of infrastructure, including regular recharging facilities, is essential for high EV adoption rates. Based on this awareness, this study aims to explore the impact of enhanced availability of charging facilities, such as through sharing and online reservations, on the intention to purchase BEVs in urban areas of Japan with high apartment dwelling ratios.

Suggested Citation

  • Manaka, Kyoko & Kikuchi, Hinata & Nakamura, Akihiro, 2024. "Analysis of changes in purchase intention of electric vehicles due to the spread of ICT-based sharing and reservations for in-town recharging facilities," 24th ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2024. New bottles for new wine: digital transformation demands new policies and strategies 302467, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:itsb24:302467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/302467/1/ITS-Seoul-2024-paper-026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clara Benevolo & Renata Paola Dameri & Beatrice D’Auria, 2016. "Smart Mobility in Smart City," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Teresina Torre & Alessio Maria Braccini & Riccardo Spinelli (ed.), Empowering Organizations, edition 1, pages 13-28, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yoo, Sunbin & Kumagai, Junya & Kim, Sung Hoo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2026. "Shared e-mopeds and equity implications: Insights from trip-level data in Fukuoka, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Davide Maria Bruno & Guido Musante & Fabio Dacarro, 2022. "Smart Trams : A Design Proposal for a City of Interrelation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Johannes Stübinger & Lucas Schneider, 2020. "Understanding Smart City—A Data-Driven Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Anthea van der Hoogen & Ifeoluwapo Fashoro & Andre P. Calitz & Lamla Luke, 2024. "A Digital Transformation Framework for Smart Municipalities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Marcin Janusz & Marcin Kowalczyk, 2022. "How Smart Are V4 Cities? Evidence from the Multidimensional Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Mário Meireles & Paulo J. G. Ribeiro, 2020. "Digital Platform/Mobile App to Boost Cycling for the Promotion of Sustainable Mobility in Mid-Sized Starter Cycling Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow & Monika Wawer & Anna Głowacz, 2023. "Energy-Efficient City Transportation Solutions in the Context of Energy-Conserving and Mobility Behaviours of Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Pamučar, Dragan & Durán-Romero, Gemma & Yazdani, Morteza & López, Ana M., 2023. "A decision analysis model for smart mobility system development under circular economy approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Diana Angarita-Lozano & Darío Hidalgo-Guerrero & Sonia Díaz-Márquez & María Morales-Puentes & Miguel Angel Mendoza-Moreno, 2025. "Multidimensional Evaluation Model for Sustainable and Smart Urban Mobility in Global South Cities: A Citizen-Centred Comprehensive Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    9. Alessandro Crivellari & Euro Beinat, 2020. "Forecasting Spatially-Distributed Urban Traffic Volumes via Multi-Target LSTM-Based Neural Network Regressor," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Rodolfo Metulini & Maurizio Carpita, 2024. "Modeling and forecasting traffic flows with mobile phone big data in flooding risk areas to support a data-driven decision making," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 342(3), pages 1629-1654, November.
    11. Oana Luca & Florian Gaman & Emanuel Răuță, 2021. "Towards a National Harmonized Framework for Urban Plans and Strategies in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Guido Perboli & Mariangela Rosano, 2020. "A Taxonomic Analysis of Smart City Projects in North America and Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-23, September.
    13. Tanja Manders & Elke Klaassen, 2019. "Unpacking the Smart Mobility Concept in the Dutch Context Based on a Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Okyere, Dennis Kwadwo & Poku-Boansi, Michael & Adarkwa, Kwasi Kwafo, 2018. "Connecting the dots: The nexus between transport and telecommunication in Ghana," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 836-844.
    15. Koutra, Sesil & Becue, Vincent & Ioakimidis, Christos S., 2019. "Searching for the ‘smart’ definition through its spatial approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 924-936.
    16. Francesco Pinna & Francesca Masala & Chiara Garau, 2017. "Urban Policies and Mobility Trends in Italian Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Parul Gupta & Sumedha Chauhan & M. P. Jaiswal, 2019. "Classification of Smart City Research - a Descriptive Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 661-685, June.
    18. Dameri, Renata Paola & Benevolo, Clara & Veglianti, Eleonora & Li, Yaya, 2019. "Understanding smart cities as a glocal strategy: A comparison between Italy and China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 26-41.
    19. Claudio Risso & Sergio Nesmachnow & Germán Faller, 2023. "Optimized Design of a Backbone Network for Public Transportation in Montevideo, Uruguay," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-29, November.
    20. Kfir Noy & Moshe Givoni, 2018. "Is ‘Smart Mobility’ Sustainable? Examining the Views and Beliefs of Transport’s Technological Entrepreneurs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:itsb24:302467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.itsworld.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.