IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifwkie/2818.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Deepening and widening of the EU: a contradiction?

Author

Listed:
  • Stehn, Jürgen

Abstract

The process of European integration has reached a formerly unknown speed. The completion of the Internal Market has led to a mutual recognition or harmonization of varying standards, norms, and regulations among EU member countries. Moreover, the treaty of Maastricht widened the competences of the EU in various areas of economic policy. At the same time, the former EFTA-members Sweden, Finland, and Austria joined the European Union; the Central and Eastern European reform countries are willing to follow as soon as possible. Above all, the knocking-on-the-door of the young market-economies in Eastern Europe has raised the question, whether a widening of the integration area with countries that are lagging behind with regard to their economic development is in contradiction to a deepening of the European Union. Thus, this paper aims at discussing potential contradictions and alternative concepts of resolution. In a first part, it will be shown that the deepening of the EU has gone beyond the economic optimal degree and is, therefore, indeed in contradiction to a full membership of Central and Eastern European countries in the EU. Then, alternative concepts of an opening-up of EU-markets towards Eastern Europe will be discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Stehn, Jürgen, 1997. "Deepening and widening of the EU: a contradiction?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 2818, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:2818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/2818/1/Ste_Deepening_Widening_EU.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horst Siebert, 1989. "Perspektiven zur Vollendung des europäischen Binnenmarktes," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 181-201, August.
    2. Laaser Claus-Friedrich & Stehn Jürgen, 1996. "Marktwirtschaft und Subsidiarität: Die föderative Arbeitsteilung auf dem Prüfstand," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 45(1), pages 58-91, April.
    3. Grubel, Herbert G & Lloyd, P J, 1971. "The Empirical Measurement of Intra- Industry Trade," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 47(120), pages 494-517, December.
    4. Langhammer, Rolf J., 1992. "Die Assoziierungsabkommen mit der CSFR, Polen und Ungarn: wegweisend oder abweisend?," Kiel Discussion Papers 182, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Smith, Alasdair & Venables, Anthony J., 1988. "Completing the internal market in the European Community : Some industry simulations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1501-1525, September.
    6. Siebert, Horst, 1989. "The harmonization issue in Europe: prior agreement or a competitive process?," Kiel Working Papers 377, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. Klodt, Henning, 1987. "Wettlauf um die Zukunft: Technologiepolitik im internationalen Vergleich," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 372, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    8. Klodt, Henning & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Maurer, Rainer & Neu, Axel Dietmar & Soltwedel, Rüdiger & Stehn, Jürgen, 1992. "Die Strukturpolitik der EG," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 757, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stehn, Jürgen, 1997. "Maastricht and the eastern enlargement of the EU," Kiel Working Papers 804, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    2. Stehn, Jürgen, 1994. "Stufen einer Osterweiterung der Europäischen Union," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1603, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Schrader, Klaus, 2005. "Handelspartner Polen: In der EU angekommen?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 3666, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    4. Sichelschmidt, Henning, 1997. "Das Programm Transeuropäische Netze der EU - ein sinnvolles Konzept für den Verkehr von morgen?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1738, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Klodt, Henning, 1993. "Perspektiven des Ost-West-Handels: die komparativen Vorteile der mittel- und osteuropäischen Reformländer," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1584, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    6. Lagnevik, Magnus & Lammers, Konrad & Genell, Kristina & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich & Lundin, Göran & Lundqvist, Karl-Johann & Olander, Lars-Olof, 1992. "The Baltic connection: industrial structure in and intergration between Southern Sweden and Nothern Germany," Kiel Working Papers 520, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    7. David Greenaway & Robert C. Hine, 1991. "Intra‐Industry Specialization, Trade Expansion and Adjustment in the European Economic Space," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 603-622, December.
    8. Stehn, Jürgen, 1992. "Umsatzbesteuerung im EG-Binnenmarkt: von der Mehrwertsteuer zur Verkaufssteuer?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 1532, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    9. Schrader, Klaus & Laaser, Claus-Friedrich, 2017. "Die Bedeutung Kataloniens für die spanische Volkswirtschaft," Kiel Policy Brief 108, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    10. Klodt, Henning & Maurer, Rainer & Schimmelpfennig, Axel, 1997. "Tertiarisierung in der deutschen Wirtschaft," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 959, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Donges, Juergen B., 1989. "Die EG auf dem Weg zum Binnenmarkt? Erwartungen, Konsequenzen, Probleme," Kiel Working Papers 360, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Hiemenz, Ulrich (Ed.) & Gundlach, Erich (Ed.), 1994. "Regional integration in Europe and its effects on developing countries," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 794, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. De Bonis, Valeria, 1997. "Regional integration and factor income taxation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1849, The World Bank.
    14. Zuzana Brixiova & Qingwei Meng & Mthuli Ncube, 2015. "Can Intra-Regional Trade Act as a Global Shock Absorber in Africa?," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 16(3), pages 141-162, July.
    15. Jaime de Melo & David Tarr, 2015. "VERs under imperfect competition and foreign direct investment: A case study of the US–Japan auto VER," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 22, pages 461-483, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    16. Ville Kaitila, 2002. "Accession Countries’ Comparative Advantage in the Internal," International Trade 0209001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Peter Nunnenkamp & Rainer Thiele, 2013. "Financing for Development: The Gap between Words and Deeds since Monterrey," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(1), pages 75-98, January.
    18. Sourish Dutta, 2023. "Horizontal and Vertical Differentiation: Approaching Endogenous Measurement in Intra-industry Trade," Papers 2307.10660, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    19. Razin, Assaf & Sadka, Efraim & Coury, Tarek, 2003. "Trade openness, investment instability and terms-of-trade volatility," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 285-306, December.
    20. Arjan Lejour & Vladimir Solanic & Paul Tang, 2009. "EU Accession and Income Growth: An Empirical Approach," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 16(1), pages 127-144, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifwkie:2818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.